Category Archives: Standing

D.P.R.: Just being a driver of vehicle doesn’t give standing; two traffic tickets in past in vehicle not enough

Defendant at the suppression hearing showed no possessory interest in the vehicle he claimed not to own at the time of the stop and search. Two traffic tickets in the past driving the same vehicle wasn’t enough. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Just being a driver of vehicle doesn’t give standing; two traffic tickets in past in vehicle not enough

D.Nev.: There is no co-conspirator standing

Defendant was charged as a co-conspirator in a drug conspiracy involving a warehouse. He makes no effort to show his individual standing, and being a co-conspirator isn’t enough. United States v. Galecki, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185667 (D. Nev. Sept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: There is no co-conspirator standing

W.D.Pa.: The borrower of a car has standing

The borrower of a car has standing. “Standing requires a fact-bound inquiry. In this case, Jones was the sole occupant of the car, obtained possession of the car by consent from his cousin, exercised exclusive control over the vehicle for … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: The borrower of a car has standing

D.Del.: Evasiveness during a public intox arrest justified Terry frisk

Defendant was arrested for public intox and he became evasive including a request that his name not be run for warrants. That justified a Terry frisk. United States v. King, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40213 (D. Del. March 21, 2017).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Del.: Evasiveness during a public intox arrest justified Terry frisk

S.D.W.Va.: Flagrant violation of 4A with warrantless GPS on def’s car doesn’t get suppressed because of def’s lack of standing at time of search

The police flagrantly violated the Fourth Amendment by placing a GPS device on a car without a warrant. Defendant was the target, but he’d sold and relinquished control of the car to another days later by the time of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Flagrant violation of 4A with warrantless GPS on def’s car doesn’t get suppressed because of def’s lack of standing at time of search

S.D.N.Y.: Sporadic user of cell phone had no standing; gathering provider information not a “search”

Defendant moved to suppress the cell phone data from a phone he sporadically used during a conspiracy, but he has no standing. The date was 334 days worth, and his use was occasional. This is no different that a sporadic … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Standing, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Sporadic user of cell phone had no standing; gathering provider information not a “search”

S.D.Fla.: Co. that rented vehicles to another for rental to public had standing to sue over seizure

Plaintiffs stated a Fourth Amendment claim against the City for warrantless seizure of its motorized three-wheeled vehicles. The fact one plaintiff rented them to another in exchange for a share of the profits, and they were seized from the latter, … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Co. that rented vehicles to another for rental to public had standing to sue over seizure

D.Nev.: To have standing in a package, one must be addressee or sender

In this conspiracy case involving mailed packages, none of the defendants were shown as the sender or addressee of this package. The defendant pursuing the motion didn’t even directly possess the package: He drove a woman to the post office … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: To have standing in a package, one must be addressee or sender

CA5: Interstate bus passenger had no standing against a dog sniff of the luggage compartment

An interstate bus passenger had no standing against a dog sniff of the luggage compartment of the bus. United States v. Rodriguez-Lara, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3774 (5th Cir. March 2, 2017):

Posted in Dog sniff, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Interstate bus passenger had no standing against a dog sniff of the luggage compartment

CA8: Def had no standing in sex trafficking victim’s cell phone

Defendant sought to challenge his previously waived search issue by seeking to withdraw his guilty plea. The phone belonged to his sex trafficking victim, so he apparently doesn’t have standing. United States v. McHenry, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3358 (8th … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Def had no standing in sex trafficking victim’s cell phone

D.S.C.: No REP in a rental rented by another and loaned to def where he wasn’t on the rental contract

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental car rented by another and loaned to him when the rental company didn’t authorize him as a driver. United States v. Dorsey, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21112 (D.S.C. Feb. 15, … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on D.S.C.: No REP in a rental rented by another and loaned to def where he wasn’t on the rental contract

C.D.Cal.: The second hand borrower of a car without knowledge of owner has no standing in it

The car defendant was in was owned by a G.B. who lent it to a Tanisha because she needed a car. Unbeknownst to G.B., Tanisha loaned it to the defendant, and G.B. had no knowledge of him. Defendant attempted to … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: The second hand borrower of a car without knowledge of owner has no standing in it

W.D.Pa.: Mere shareholder in a business had no standing to challenge SW

As a mere shareholder in a business, defendant had no standing to challenge the search warrant of the property. At the time of the search, he had no personal interest in it. United States v. Taylor, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Mere shareholder in a business had no standing to challenge SW

CA7: Def had no standing in a car shipped by car hauler being delivered to him that he’d never seen

Defendant had no standing in a car being shipped by a car hauler across the country when it was searched in transit. He was named neither the sender nor the recipient, and he had never been in or seen the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: Def had no standing in a car shipped by car hauler being delivered to him that he’d never seen

CA8: Passenger in his gf’s rented car driven by yet another had no standing

Defendant was a passenger in a rental vehicle rented by his girlfriend but being driven by a third person. He was not on the rental agreement as a driver or a co-renter. He had no standing. United States v. Russell, … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Passenger in his gf’s rented car driven by yet another had no standing

CA3: Disavowal of cell phone in car was a waiver of standing

The search of the call log on the cell phone in the car defendant was driving a year before Riley was valid. He also disavowed the cell phone and lacks standing. United States v. Monestime, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1501 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Disavowal of cell phone in car was a waiver of standing

KY: SW moots consent argument

Officers entered defendant’s home to secure a firearm and then returned with a search warrant. Defendant’s consent argument is moot. Lundy v. Commonwealth, 2017 Ky. App. LEXIS 22 (Jan. 27, 2017). The court properly overruled defendant’s motion to suppress a … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident, Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on KY: SW moots consent argument

PA: Warrantless blood draw of unconscious def after car wreck was reasonable

A warrantless blood draw was permissible where defendant was unconscious at the scene of an accident and unconscious through the blood draw at the hospital. Commonwealth v. March, 2017 PA Super 18, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 46 (Jan. 26, 2017). … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Standing | Comments Off on PA: Warrantless blood draw of unconscious def after car wreck was reasonable

Bloomberg: Microsoft Asserts Clients’ Rights in FBI E-Mail Searches Fight

Bloomberg: Microsoft Asserts Clients’ Rights in FBI E-Mail Searches Fight by Kartikay Mehrotra: –First hurdle is convincing judge it can sue on their behalf –Tech industry says future of mobile, cloud computing at stake

Posted in E-mail, Standing | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Microsoft Asserts Clients’ Rights in FBI E-Mail Searches Fight

IT World: Microsoft’s standing to sue over secret US data requests in question

IT World: Microsoft’s standing to sue over secret US data requests in question by John Ribeiro: The company has objected in a lawsuit to unreasonable US government requests for customer data

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on IT World: Microsoft’s standing to sue over secret US data requests in question