D.Del.: Evasiveness during a public intox arrest justified Terry frisk

Defendant was arrested for public intox and he became evasive including a request that his name not be run for warrants. That justified a Terry frisk. United States v. King, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40213 (D. Del. March 21, 2017).*

Defendant’s moving papers inconclusively suggest he has standing in a detached garage next to his house that blew up and caught on fire. Defendant’s injuries led to his leg being amputated below the knee. The court wants a hearing on standing and whether the warrantless entry into the burned garage was reasonable. United States v. O’Neill, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40138 (W.D. N.Y. March 3, 2017).*

The alleged inaccuracy in the affidavit of probable cause didn’t undermine it. United States v. Musto, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40862 (M.D. Pa. March 22, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.