July 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Archives
-
Recent Posts
- CA11: Yahoo not a govt actor in scanning emails for CSAM
- Treatise 25% off through 7/8
- SCOTUS: Geofence warrants governed by Carpenter and are a search; remanded for resolution of issues (interesting take on third party doctrine, too)
- The Guardian: ‘It’s dangerous and it’s going to erode trust’: redesign of US government websites stokes surveillance fears
- W.D.N.Y.: Possibility of co-conspirators in mass murder justified emergency disclosure request to Apple, Verizon, and Facebook
-
-
ABA Journal Web 100, Best Law Blogs (2015-17) (then discontinued)
-
-
by John Wesley Hall
Criminal Defense Lawyer and
Search and seizure law consultant
Little Rock, Arkansas
Contact: forhall @ aol.com
Search and Seizure (6th ed. 2025)
www.johnwesleyhall.com -
© 2003-26,
online since Feb. 24, 2003 Approx. 600,000 visits (non-robot) since 2012 Approx. 50,000 posts since 2003 (29,000 on WordPress as of 12/31/25) -
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fourth Amendment cases, citations, and links -
Latest Slip Opinions:
U.S. Supreme Court (Home)
S.Ct. Shadow Docket Database
Federal Appellate Courts Opinions
First Circuit
Second Circuit
Third Circuit
Fourth Circuit
Fifth Circuit
Sixth Circuit
Seventh Circuit
Eighth Circuit
Ninth Circuit
Tenth Circuit
Eleventh Circuit
D.C. Circuit
Federal Circuit
Foreign Intell.Surv.Ct.
FDsys, many district courts, other federal courts
Military Courts: C.A.A.F., Army, AF, N-M, CG, SF
State courts (and some USDC opinions)
Google Scholar
Advanced Google Scholar
Google search tips
LexisWeb
LII State Appellate Courts
LexisONE free caselaw
Findlaw Free Opinions
To search Search and Seizure on Lexis.com $ -
Research Links:
Supreme Court:
SCOTUSBlog
S. Ct. Docket
Solicitor General's site
SCOTUSreport
Briefs online (but no amicus briefs)
Oyez Project (NWU)
"On the Docket"–Medill
S.Ct. Monitor: Law.com
S.Ct. Com't'ry: Law.com
-
General (many free):
LexisWeb
Google Scholar | Google
LexisOne Legal Website Directory
Crimelynx
Lexis.com $
Lexis.com (criminal law/ 4th Amd) $
Findlaw.com
Findlaw.com (4th Amd)
Westlaw.com $
F.R.Crim.P. 41
www.fd.org
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Resources
FBI Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (2008) (pdf)
DEA Agents Manual (2002) (download)
DOJ Computer Search Manual (2009) (pdf)
Stringrays (ACLU No. Cal.) (pdf)
-
Congressional Research Service:
--Electronic Communications Privacy Act (2012)
--Overview of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (2012)
--Outline of Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping (2012)
--Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping (2012)
--Federal Laws Relating to Cybersecurity: Discussion of Proposed Revisions (2012)
ACLU on privacy
Privacy Foundation
Electronic Frontier Foundation
NACDL’s Domestic Drone Information Center
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Criminal Appeal (post-conviction) (9th Cir.)
Section 1983 Blog -
"If it was easy, everybody would be doing it. It isn't, and they don't."
—Me -
"Life is not a matter of holding good cards, but of playing a poor hand well."
–Josh Billings (pseudonym of Henry Wheeler Shaw), Josh Billings on Ice, and Other Things (1868) (erroneously attributed to Robert Louis Stevenson, among others) -
“I am still learning.”
—Domenico Giuntalodi (but misattributed to Michelangelo Buonarroti (common phrase throughout 1500's)). -
"Love work; hate mastery over others; and avoid intimacy with the government."
—Shemaya, in the Thalmud -
"It is a pleasant world we live in, sir, a very pleasant world. There are bad people in it, Mr. Richard, but if there were no bad people, there would be no good lawyers."
—Charles Dickens, “The Old Curiosity Shop ... With a Frontispiece. From a Painting by Geo. Cattermole, Etc.” 255 (1848) -
"A system of law that not only makes certain conduct criminal, but also lays down rules for the conduct of the authorities, often becomes complex in its application to individual cases, and will from time to time produce imperfect results, especially if one's attention is confined to the particular case at bar. Some criminals do go free because of the necessity of keeping government and its servants in their place. That is one of the costs of having and enforcing a Bill of Rights. This country is built on the assumption that the cost is worth paying, and that in the long run we are all both freer and safer if the Constitution is strictly enforced."
—Williams v. Nix, 700 F. 2d 1164, 1173 (8th Cir. 1983) (Richard Sheppard Arnold, J.), rev'd Nix v. Williams, 467 US. 431 (1984). -
"The criminal goes free, if he must, but it is the law that sets him free. Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
—Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 659 (1961). -
"Any costs the exclusionary rule are costs imposed directly by the Fourth Amendment."
—Yale Kamisar, 86 Mich.L.Rev. 1, 36 n. 151 (1987). -
"There have been powerful hydraulic pressures throughout our history that bear heavily on the Court to water down constitutional guarantees and give the police the upper hand. That hydraulic pressure has probably never been greater than it is today."
— Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 39 (1968) (Douglas, J., dissenting). -
"The great end, for which men entered into society, was to secure their property."
—Entick v. Carrington, 19 How.St.Tr. 1029, 1066, 95 Eng. Rep. 807 (C.P. 1765) -
"It is a fair summary of history to say that the safeguards of liberty have frequently been forged in controversies involving not very nice people. And so, while we are concerned here with a shabby defrauder, we must deal with his case in the context of what are really the great themes expressed by the Fourth Amendment."
—United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 69 (1950) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting) -
"The course of true law pertaining to searches and seizures, as enunciated here, has not–to put it mildly–run smooth."
—Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610, 618 (1961) (Frankfurter, J., concurring). -
"A search is a search, even if it happens to disclose nothing but the bottom of a turntable."
—Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 325 (1987) -
"For the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. ... But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected."
—Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967) -
“Experience should teach us to be most on guard to protect liberty when the Government’s purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded
rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”
—United States v. Olmstead, 277 U.S. 438, 479 (1925) (Brandeis, J., dissenting)
-
“Liberty—the freedom from unwarranted intrusion by government—is as easily lost through insistent nibbles by government officials who seek to do their jobs too well as by those whose purpose it is to oppress; the piranha can be as deadly as the shark.”
—United States v. $124,570, 873 F.2d 1240, 1246 (9th Cir. 1989) -
"You can't always get what you want / But if you try sometimes / You just might find / You get what you need."
—Mick Jagger & Keith Richards, Let it Bleed (album, 1969) -
"In Germany, they first came for the communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for
the Catholics and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Catholic. Then they came
for me–and by that time there was nobody left to speak up."
—Martin Niemöller (1945) [he served seven years in a concentration camp] -
“Children grow up thinking the adult world is ordered, rational, fit for purpose. It’s crap. Becoming a man is realising that it’s all rotten. Realising how to celebrate that rottenness, that’s freedom.”
– John le Carré, The Night Manager (1993), line by Richard Roper -
"The point of the Fourth Amendment, which often is not grasped by zealous officers, is not that it denies law enforcement the support of the usual inferences which reasonable men draw from evidence. Its protection consists in requiring that those inferences be drawn by a neutral and detached magistrate instead of being judged by the officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime."
—Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 13-14 (1948) -
The book was dedicated in the first (1982) and sixth (2025) editions to Justin William Hall (1975-2025). He was three when this project started in 1978.
Website design by Wally Waller, Colorado Springs. 
Category Archives: Consent
ND: State can’t justify exigent circumstances; suppressed
The state could not justify exigent circumstances in this case. Even the officer’s own testimony admittedly didn’t support it. State v. Stewart, 2014 ND 165, 2014 N.D. LEXIS 167 (July 31, 2014).* While consent of search of rooms of a … Continue reading →
NY2: Property assessors need a warrant for an interior inspection without consent
“Since the Town respondents sought entry into the petitioner’s home to have the Town’s appraiser conduct an inspection of the premises, the Town respondents were required to obtain a warrant upon a showing of probable cause. By directing the petitioner … Continue reading →
D.Ariz.: Being diverted at the border to a secondary inspection area is not custody for Miranda purposes
Being diverted at the border to a secondary inspection area is not custody for Miranda purposes. United States v. Sanchez-Avitia, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103233 (D. Ariz. March 26, 2014). Since there was no violation of the Fifth Amendment during … Continue reading →
CA11: Defendant consented to a search of his computer for CP in investigation of a missing 7 year old
A 7 year old girl went missing that defendant knew and visited his house, and he was questioned, but not as a suspect. [Later somebody with no connection to defendant was arrested.] When questioned, he admitted to visiting child pornography … Continue reading →
Cal1: Order to sit on curb and police dominated atmosphere made consent invalid
Defendant was unlawfully detained when he gave consent to search a backpack. The officer involved often casually talked to people on his beat. When he encountered defendant, he struck up a conversation but finally told him to have a seat … Continue reading →
CA8: Despite an ongoing search of his house for CP, defendant wasn’t in custody when he made statements
The district court erred in concluding defendant was “in custody” for Miranda purposes. He showed up at his house as a search warrant was being executed and was talked to on the couch. He was told he was not in … Continue reading →
W.D.Pa.: No standing in CSLI of somebody else’s cell phone
A cell phone user has no reasonable expectation of privacy in cell site location data records kept by the telephone company of a telephone that he was using that he was not the subscriber to. United States v. Woodley, 2014 … Continue reading →
D.Nev.: Jones GPS ruling is not retroactive on collateral review
United States v. Jones GPS ruling is not retroactive on collateral review. United States v. Wineman, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98665 (D. Nev. February 27, 2014). Defendant’s stop was based on an unsubstantiated CI and there was no traffic offense. … Continue reading →
CA6: Heck bar doesn’t apply to third parties not in prior criminal case
One plaintiff’s complaint over his arrest was Heck barred, but third party Fourth Amendment claims were not. [This came up through a complex procedural issue.] Hayward v. Cleveland Clinic Found., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13802, 2014 FED App. 0157P (6th … Continue reading →
N.D.Ga.: Not briefing an argument in a motion to suppress is waiver
There was a hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress. He raised multiple issues. That which were not briefed in the post-hearing brief are deemed abandoned. “Defendant has failed to perfect, delineate the arguments for, or otherwise expound upon the basis … Continue reading →
N.D.Ga.: Buie in the real world; it’s not always clear
The protective sweep in defendant’s small home was not justified by the circumstances, but it did not taint the subsequent consent. United States v. Smallwood, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96248 (N.D. Ga. June 27, 2014). Interesting discussion of Buie before … Continue reading →
WA: Claimants can use motion for return of property seized for serial forfeiture seizures to speed up proceed
Defendant’s vehicle was seized for taking a whitetailed buck out of season. “¶17 The trial court understandably was concerned that by sequentially seizing property, the government could unreasonably deprive people of the use of their property by prolonging proceedings. However, … Continue reading →
MA: State’s RS argument wasn’t made to trial court, so it can’t be made on appeal
The state’s reasonable suspicion argument that officers were concerned for officer safety at the time of the search was not made in the trial court, so it can’t be made on appeal. Commonwealth v. Jordan, 469 Mass. 134, 12 N.E.3d … Continue reading →
WI: Passenger’s statement “Got a warrant for that?”, was not objection to driver’s consent to briefcase
Originally posted June 7, 2013, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that a passenger’s statement “Got a warrant for that?”, was not objection to driver’s consent to briefcase. a href=”http://wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92854″>State v. Wantland, 2013 WI App 36, 346 Wis. 2d 680, … Continue reading →
SC: Lifetime GPS monitoring of sex offender on parole might be unreasonable, but later
Defendant was convicted of a sex offense with a child, and he was ordered to be GPS monitored for life. GPS monitoring is a reasonable condition, but lifetime monitoring may not be. He can, however, raise that issue periodically with … Continue reading →
N.D.Ga.: Whatever time is “reasonable” for a stop, the clock restarts when consent is granted
The stop was of reasonable duration before consent was sought. “Once Jaramillo consented to the search of the Tahoe, ‘the clock re-started for purposes of evaluating the reasonableness of the duration of the intrusion.’ Hernandez, 418 F.3d at 1210 (citation … Continue reading →
W.D.Tenn. & TN: A chain of custody issue revealed at the suppression hearing is a trial issue
There was probable cause shown by the 16 page affidavit for search warrant. Potential issues of chain of custody are not an issue for a motion to suppress. That’s an issue for trial. United States v. Williams, 2014 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →
TN: Consent not invalid for threat of SW that was with PC; also exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to probation revo
The request for consent here was not backed by a baseless threat to get a search warrant because the officers had probable cause. Here, however, this was a probation revocation, and the exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply. State v. Fife, 2014 … Continue reading →
N.D.Ga.: Summers and Bailey don’t apply where there is probable cause
Michigan v. Summers (1981) and Bailey v. United States (2013) don’t even apply where there is independent probable cause for the suspect. This motion to suppress is “patently meritless.” United States v. Bocanegra, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86481 (N.D. Ga. … Continue reading →
ND: Male driver’s consent doesn’t extend to female passenger’s purse in a car
The driver of the car was male, and he granted consent to search the car. It was unreasonable for the officer to believe that that consent extended to the woman passenger’s purse. State v. Daniels, 2014 ND 124, 2014 N.D. … Continue reading →