C.D.Ill.: One doesn’t have standing in a cell phone that’s not his

Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the search of a cell phone that he denied was his, but it was covered under the search warrant anyway and circuit authority authorized warrrantless searches before Riley. United States v. Brown, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110330 (C.D. Ill. August 11, 2014).

The facts support the conclusion that the encounter between defendant and the officer was consensual when defendant first got out of the vehicle, and reasonable suspicion developed after that. State v. Knicely, 2014-Ohio-3437, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 3373 (6th Dist. August 8, 2014).*

Officers had probable cause to arrest defendant by the time he was seized because headlong flight while carrying a gun in a high-crime area where shots were heard within the last 3 minutes was sufficiently suggestive of wrongdoing to support probable cause. State v. Hill, 288 Neb. 767, 2014 Neb. LEXIS 128 (August 8, 2014).*

Defendant’s stop was justified by a window tinting violation, pretextual or not, so no IAC. Walden v. United States, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110473 (E.D. Tenn. August 11, 2014).*