D.Ariz.: Being diverted at the border to a secondary inspection area is not custody for Miranda purposes

Being diverted at the border to a secondary inspection area is not custody for Miranda purposes. United States v. Sanchez-Avitia, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103233 (D. Ariz. March 26, 2014).

Since there was no violation of the Fifth Amendment during this traffic stop, the consent was voluntary and not tainted by that. United States v. Cortez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102792 (S.D. Mich. July 29, 2014).*

The affidavit for the search warrant showed plenty of nexus to the premises to be searched because of the activities recounted there. United States v. DeJournett, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103271 (N.D. Ohio July 29, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Border search, Consent, Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.