W.D.Pa.: No standing in CSLI of somebody else’s cell phone

A cell phone user has no reasonable expectation of privacy in cell site location data records kept by the telephone company of a telephone that he was using that he was not the subscriber to. United States v. Woodley, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99350 (W.D.Pa. July 21, 2014).

Defendant’s consent to search his motel room was not voluntary. He was handcuffed, surrounded by five officers, and merely acquiesced to their demands. United States v. Jackson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99319 (M.D. La. July 22, 2014).*

Defendant and the officer knew each other from prior nonarrest encounters and engaged in conversation when the officer saw him walking. The officer told him to stay while he got out of the car and then asked for consent to search defendant’s sea bag, which was given. Under state supreme court authority, the court has to find that the stop was not coercive [but suggesting it would otherwise]. State v. Cline, 264 Ore. App. __, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 962 (July 16, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.