SC: Lifetime GPS monitoring of sex offender on parole might be unreasonable, but later

Defendant was convicted of a sex offense with a child, and he was ordered to be GPS monitored for life. GPS monitoring is a reasonable condition, but lifetime monitoring may not be. He can, however, raise that issue periodically with the sentencing court. State v. Nation, 2014 S.C. LEXIS 215 (July 2, 2014).

The search of defendant’s cell phone by consent that was almost certainly coerced was harmless error in light of all the other evidence in the case. United States v. Arrellano, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12654 (7th Cir. July 2, 2014).*

The primary occupant of the home granted effective consent to enter to look for defendant. The police said they were looking for him, and she said he was upstairs and stepped back to allow entry. United States v. Green, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90377 (M.D. La. July 1, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Consent, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.