Author Archives: Hall

GA: No standing in the cell phone of one’s murder victim taken at the time of the crime

In a form of “wrongful presence,” defendant took the cell phones of his murder victims. He has no standing to challenge the obtaining of the call records of those phones that helped link defendant to the crimes. Marchman v. State, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on GA: No standing in the cell phone of one’s murder victim taken at the time of the crime

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: After police raided an apartment building to arrest a suspect, others were left with the collateral damage

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: After police raided an apartment building to arrest a suspect, others were left with the collateral damage by Koran Addo: The aftermath of the standoff highlights a murky legal area where in some places law enforcement covers … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on St. Louis Post-Dispatch: After police raided an apartment building to arrest a suspect, others were left with the collateral damage

The Hill: Congress Blog: Congress should stop government hacking and protect the Fourth Amendment

The Hill: Congress Blog: Congress should stop government hacking and protect the Fourth Amendment by Peter Goldberger: While it is surely possible to craft a constitutional procedure for digital searches, the rulemaking process is not adequate for addressing such sensitive … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on The Hill: Congress Blog: Congress should stop government hacking and protect the Fourth Amendment

ID: Michigan v. Summers on detention of bystanders can apply to arrest warrants, too

Summers rationale of detaining bystanders when executing a search warrant can apply to arrest warrants. Here, the target of the arrest warrant fled, and that justified the officers in detaining the others just in case of a risk of a … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Michigan v. Summers on detention of bystanders can apply to arrest warrants, too

AK: State didn’t prove car’s ashtray was associated with the person to store things

Defendant was stopped for blocking the road with the passenger door open and a man leaning, and officers suspected a drug transaction, further confirmed at least in part by the person leaning in running and jumping three fences to get … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on AK: State didn’t prove car’s ashtray was associated with the person to store things

OR: State veterinarian taking blood from def’s sick dog was a seizure requiring a warrant

A warrantless search of a dog’s blood by a state hired veterinarian after seizure of the sick animal was a seizure by the state requiring a warrant. State v. Newcomb, 359 Ore. 756, 2016 Ore. LEXIS 366 (June 16, 2016):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on OR: State veterinarian taking blood from def’s sick dog was a seizure requiring a warrant

OR: WA state trooper couldn’t make stop in OR under statute or common law; citizen’s arrest doesn’t apply to traffic offenses

Defendant was stopped for speeding by a Washington State Trooper who followed defendant into Oregon. The out-of-state officer didn’t have any statutory authority for a stop and the common law didn’t permit officers outside their jurisdiction to make stops. Citizen’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Common law, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: WA state trooper couldn’t make stop in OR under statute or common law; citizen’s arrest doesn’t apply to traffic offenses

CA8 decides merits of state search claim to find it valid and thus no “Strickland prejudice”

Defendant suffered no Strickland prejudice from defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress the contents of a Crown Royal bag that was found in a search for a long barrelled gun. A kitchen cabinet was opened and drugs … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA8 decides merits of state search claim to find it valid and thus no “Strickland prejudice”

SCOTUS: Utah v. Strieff: Even if stop lacked RS, finding an arrest warrant on def justified his search; the warrant is attenuated from the stop (so they can violate the 4A if there’s a warrant out)

Defendant was stopped leaving a drug house under surveillance. He gave his name, and an arrest warrant came back for him. Attenuation is found without regard to the validity of the stop. The attenuation doctrine is not limited to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Utah v. Strieff: Even if stop lacked RS, finding an arrest warrant on def justified his search; the warrant is attenuated from the stop (so they can violate the 4A if there’s a warrant out)

DE: Patdown unreasonable; state didn’t argue for probation search and court won’t decide that

Defendant was subjected to a patdown that was unreasonable, and it is suppressed. Defendant was on probation then, and the probation search exception could have been relied on but wasn’t. The court won’t argue the state’s case for it. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Patdown unreasonable; state didn’t argue for probation search and court won’t decide that

CA6: Officers doing a knock-and-talk for meth were confronted with an emergency justifying entry

Officers responded to a noise complaint and ran into a guy outside who said he was there to buy methamphetamine. They went to the door and smelled meth being manufactured. Nobody answered. They went around to the back to see … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk | Comments Off on CA6: Officers doing a knock-and-talk for meth were confronted with an emergency justifying entry

KY: Consent to look at a cell phone for a number wasn’t limited to the contacts folder; texts and calls could be examined, too

Consent to look at a cell phone for a number did not limit the search to the contacts folder; it was reasonable to look at calls and texts from that number, too. The officer also clicked on a photo marked … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: Consent to look at a cell phone for a number wasn’t limited to the contacts folder; texts and calls could be examined, too

AZ: Serial SWs were justified by further developments in a serial murder investigation

Defendant was ultimately charged with 74 felonies, including nine murders. His house was subjected to three different search warrants, each specific to one or two crimes. It was reasonable for the police to get another warrant to go back after … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AZ: Serial SWs were justified by further developments in a serial murder investigation

CA8: Fleeing from a car during a traffic stop and leaving a backpack behind is objectively an abandonment

Fleeing from a car during a traffic stop and leaving a backpack behind is objectively an abandonment. The fact it’s a semi-private place isn’t determinative here. United States v. Nowak, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10956 (8th Cir. June 17, 2016):

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on CA8: Fleeing from a car during a traffic stop and leaving a backpack behind is objectively an abandonment

CA1: Seizure of a cell phone to get a SW was proper; frisk of jacket for weapon was, too

Officers suspected defendant of sex trafficking, and Detroit PD called the Portland ME PD to report he was there, likely with a young girl. He was known to them as a prior sex trafficker. They found him at a hotel … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA1: Seizure of a cell phone to get a SW was proper; frisk of jacket for weapon was, too

W.D.N.Y.: When def saw police at door, he stepped back, and that justified their coming in to arrest him on a warrant

Defendant’s arrest with a warrant inside his apartment was valid, and the constitution didn’t required he be pulled outside to arrest. He stepped back when he saw the officers and they came in and arrested him. A limited protective sweep … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: When def saw police at door, he stepped back, and that justified their coming in to arrest him on a warrant

WA: FST is a seizure, but it is not a search under Fourth Amendment

Field sobriety test is a seizure, but it is not a search under Fourth Amendment or the more inclusive state constitution. State v. Mecham, 2016 Wash. LEXIS 695 (June 16, 2016):

Posted in Search, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: FST is a seizure, but it is not a search under Fourth Amendment

TX1: Cell phone was abandoned on roof of abandoned getaway car

The getaway car for a robbery was left outside the scene when the occupants got out of the car to shoot but scattered after gunfire. Defendant’s cell phone was left on the roof of the car. This was an abandonment … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX1: Cell phone was abandoned on roof of abandoned getaway car

OH9: Potential suicide call justified entry; “ironclad proof” not required

A call about a potential suicide was justification for police entry into the house. They don’t need “ironclad proof” that a suicide might happen, just a reasonable belief. State v. Linder, 2016-Ohio-3435, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2291 (9th Dist. June … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH9: Potential suicide call justified entry; “ironclad proof” not required

IA: Officer violated Rodriguez by shifting from speeding to drugs and asking for consent which was refused

Defendant was stopped for speeding and seemed nervous. The DL was suspended. A request for consent was made and rejected. The officer completed the paperwork for the traffic stop in six minutes but spent ten minutes attempting to elicit admissions … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Officer violated Rodriguez by shifting from speeding to drugs and asking for consent which was refused