Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Fla.: Throwing a bag aside when seeing the police is an abandonment

Throwing a bag aside when seeing the police is an abandonment. It was speculation he would retrieve it if the police didn’t get it. United States v. Morrow, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14604 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2017),* adopted, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Throwing a bag aside when seeing the police is an abandonment

Ars Technica: Judge sides with Microsoft, allows “gag order” challenge to advance

Ars Technica: Judge sides with Microsoft, allows “gag order” challenge to advance by Cyrus Farivar Microsoft Corp. v. United States DOJ, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18691 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 8, 2017) Court: “First Amendment rights may outweigh the Government interest … Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Ars Technica: Judge sides with Microsoft, allows “gag order” challenge to advance

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: 11th Circuit: Cops weren’t given enough notice that police tactics used for decades are unconstitutional

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: 11th Circuit: Cops weren’t given enough notice that police tactics used for decades are unconstitutional by Radley Balko:

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: 11th Circuit: Cops weren’t given enough notice that police tactics used for decades are unconstitutional

LA5: PC developed in lengthy investigation excused lack of SW by inevitable discovery

It wasn’t reasonable for the police to believe that defendant’s father had apparent authority to consent to a search of locked box. However, inevitable discovery applies because the investigation was well underway, and there was probable cause for a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on LA5: PC developed in lengthy investigation excused lack of SW by inevitable discovery

D.Nev.: Untimely motion to suppress summarily denied

Defendant’s untimely motion to suppress is denied. United States v. Drexler, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13833 (D.Nev. Feb. 1, 2017). Defendant was arrested for bank robbery, and a search incident to arrest of his person was valid and based on … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Untimely motion to suppress summarily denied

M.D.La.: Officer’s claim of a burglary in progress and that a protective sweep was justified was completely unjustified

It should have been apparent to the officers that the defendant was a friend of the homeowner and was a guest in the premises, and their entry was unjustified under a claim of a burglary in progress or that a … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Officer’s claim of a burglary in progress and that a protective sweep was justified was completely unjustified

MA: There is no requirement of a search protocol in the SW but it is advisable to restrain execution in computer searches

An IP address as a source of child pornography provides sufficient probable cause and nexus to search the subscriber’s home and computer. There are no search protocols for the warrant but it is advisable to use them. An administrative subpoena … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on MA: There is no requirement of a search protocol in the SW but it is advisable to restrain execution in computer searches

W.D.Pa.: Mere shareholder in a business had no standing to challenge SW

As a mere shareholder in a business, defendant had no standing to challenge the search warrant of the property. At the time of the search, he had no personal interest in it. United States v. Taylor, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Mere shareholder in a business had no standing to challenge SW

NM: No proof of common authority for consent by an occasional visitor; state doesn’t recognize apparent authority

The evidence did not show the consenter had common authority, and New Mexico does not recognize apparent authority. The exception for protective sweep and the community caretaking function also didn’t apply because there was no bona fide need for either. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NM: No proof of common authority for consent by an occasional visitor; state doesn’t recognize apparent authority

OH10: Officers could open defendant’s car door when he was apparently passed out in the front seat

Officers could open defendant’s car door when he was apparently passed out in the front seat. State v. Hall, 2017-Ohio-446, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 441 (10th Dist. Feb. 7, 2017):

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on OH10: Officers could open defendant’s car door when he was apparently passed out in the front seat

SW for a pacemaker: WaPo: A man detailed his escape from a burning house. His pacemaker told police a different story.

WaPo: A man detailed his escape from a burning house. His pacemaker told police a different story. by Cleve R. Wootson Jr.:

Posted in Body searches | Comments Off on SW for a pacemaker: WaPo: A man detailed his escape from a burning house. His pacemaker told police a different story.

NYLJ: Facebook, DA Argue Over Constitutionality of Search Warrants

NYLJ: Facebook, DA Argue Over Constitutionality of Search Warrants by John Stashenko:

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on NYLJ: Facebook, DA Argue Over Constitutionality of Search Warrants

Fortune: Social Media at the Border: Can Agents Ask for Your Facebook Feed?

Fortune: Social Media at the Border: Can Agents Ask for Your Facebook Feed? by Jeff John Roberts:

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on Fortune: Social Media at the Border: Can Agents Ask for Your Facebook Feed?

M.D.Pa.: Motion to suppress denied without prejudice for failure to plead any facts or law or brief the issue with cases

Motion to suppress denied without prejudice for failing to cite facts or authority or provide a cogent argument. United States v. Guerrier, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14405 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2017):

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Motion to suppress denied without prejudice for failure to plead any facts or law or brief the issue with cases

W.D.Tex.: Border search cursory search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable

A border search cursory search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable, even under Cotterman. They also had more than reasonable suspicion. United States v. Escarcega, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185466 (W.D. Tex. July 29, 2015):

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Border search cursory search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable

NY1: Pawnbrokers have been heavily regulated for a century; rules for information storage are reasonable

Pawnbrokers have been a heavily regulated industry for over a century. NYC’s requirement of provision of certain information in digital format is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment (compare California Bankers Assn. v. Schultz) and the limited administrative searches are reasonable. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY1: Pawnbrokers have been heavily regulated for a century; rules for information storage are reasonable

M.D.Pa.: General motion to suppress denied for not pleading any facts or law

“In light of the fact that Defendant fails to specify which statements he is seeking to suppress and the insufficiency of Defendant’s explanation for why the arrest warrant lacks probable cause, I am unable to properly consider these motions. Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: General motion to suppress denied for not pleading any facts or law

IN: 4A doesn’t require a SW be obtained at the earliest possible time

Officers were tipped off to the defendant coming through with drugs eight hours before he was stopped. The stop was for speeding and weaving, and a drug dog was used which alerted. The fact the officers had eight hours warning … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IN: 4A doesn’t require a SW be obtained at the earliest possible time

S.D.Ind.: Spending money is not an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search to recover the money

Defendant spending money is not an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search to recover the money. United States v. Jett, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13544 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 1, 2017):

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Spending money is not an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless search to recover the money

CA6: CSLI by court order was valid; lengthy pole camera observation of publicly seen areas reasonable

Lengthy CSLI was obtained by a cell site simulator but with a court order. Pleading the pen register statute is no help to the defense because there is no exclusionary remedy. Pre-Jones GPS tracking was valid under Davis. Finally, lengthy … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Pole cameras | Comments Off on CA6: CSLI by court order was valid; lengthy pole camera observation of publicly seen areas reasonable