Author Archives: Hall

CA8 upholds Playpen warrant strictly on GFE despite Rule 41 violation

Playpen warrant upheld purely on good faith exception of Davis and Herring. Rule 41 was violated, but the court finds the costs of exclusion outweight deterrence, particularly where the rule was modified to permit such later warrants. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8 upholds Playpen warrant strictly on GFE despite Rule 41 violation

CA10: Where one in car flashed gun in a bar, it was reasonable to order occupants to ground when stopped

Defendant was seen flashing a gun in a bar in Colorado, and police got a specific description including hair braids and dress from the wait staff. When the car was seen, officers ordered the occupants out and to the ground … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA10: Where one in car flashed gun in a bar, it was reasonable to order occupants to ground when stopped

CA9: § 1983 Franks violation: Ignoring alleged false statements still leaves PC

A search warrant was issued for alleged violations of the building code. Ignoring any alleged false statements that led to issuance of the search warrant, there still was probable cause. Gunnels v. Kenny, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13204 (6th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: § 1983 Franks violation: Ignoring alleged false statements still leaves PC

OR: Emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress

The emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress. Here it was cattle. State v. Hershey, 286 Ore. App. 824, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 907 (July 19, 2017). There was plenty of probable cause, but defendant’s Franks argument that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress

NE: Reach under seat during traffic stop was RS

The officer suspected that a wanted person was in the car defendant was in and stopped it. As he approached the car, the driver reached under the seat. The wanted person wasn’t found, but there was reasonable suspicion from the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: Reach under seat during traffic stop was RS

N.D.Ind.: PC for def’s cell phone was shown by his social media postings

Defendant might not have standing but there was probable cause, so standing doesn’t have to be decided. Probable cause for the search warrant for defendant’s cell phone was predicated on his social media postings of him holding firearms, and they … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: PC for def’s cell phone was shown by his social media postings

S.D.N.Y.: Seizure of months of CSLI was proper to connect def to a particular place

Months of historical CSLI, rather than just three day’s worth, was properly acquired by the government to show defendant’s connections to the property at issue. The third party doctrine provides defendant no relief [yet]. United States v. Serrano, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Seizure of months of CSLI was proper to connect def to a particular place

D.Md.: 2255 Franks IAC claim fails for not showing what the false statements were and how PC was undermined

Defendant’s 2255 Franks IAC claim fails for not showing what the false statements were and how probable cause was undermined. United States v. Johnson, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112806 (D. Md. July 20, 2017). Defendant’s moving his hands around in … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Md.: 2255 Franks IAC claim fails for not showing what the false statements were and how PC was undermined

N.D.Cal.: Defs can’t show taint from alleged illegal bugs and all that was acquired afterward in this wide-ranging investigation

There were stationary bugs that recorded conversations, and the government has declined to use them at trial after much litigation. Still, there is “a heap of incriminating evidence” derived from all kinds of sources, and the court won’t suppress all … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Defs can’t show taint from alleged illegal bugs and all that was acquired afterward in this wide-ranging investigation

W.D.N.C.: The time limit for execution of a SW doesn’t apply to the off-site search of a computer seized

The time limit for the search to occur in the warrant is for the place to be searched. When computers are seized under the warrant to be searched elsewhere, they are not subject to that time limit. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: The time limit for execution of a SW doesn’t apply to the off-site search of a computer seized

CA3: Nervousness in a high crime area isn’t RS

Defendant was in a “high crime” area around an apartment complex, and he was nervous when accosted by a law enforcement officer, something normal. This just wasn’t enough to be reasonable suspicion. United States v. Alvin, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Nervousness in a high crime area isn’t RS

DC: Time and proximity to a crime are important in RS, but here it was lacking

Time and proximity are important in the reasonable suspicion calculus. The closer in time with proximity to the scene of a crime, the more likely the suspect is involved in the suspected or already occurred criminal activity. Here, however, two … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Time and proximity to a crime are important in RS, but here it was lacking

E.D.Pa.: Security video of def’s business belies his claim of coerced consent for search

Defendant moves to suppress the search of his business because he claimed his consent was coerced. His specific claims of coercion are belied by the security video from the business. Denied. United States v. Hunt-Irving, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108253 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Security video of def’s business belies his claim of coerced consent for search

NYTimes: A Warrant to Search Your Vagina

NYTimes: A Warrant to Search Your Vagina by Andrea J. Ritchie:

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on NYTimes: A Warrant to Search Your Vagina

E.D.Tenn.: Triggering event for anticipatory warrant not met, and suppression granted

The specific triggering event for this anticipatory warrant was handing the package to defendant, but that did not happen. The police entered anyway and seized. The Sixth Circuit recognizes that the triggering event has to be considered in a common … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Triggering event for anticipatory warrant not met, and suppression granted

S.D.Tex.: Single key in the ignition adds nothing to RS

The stop was unreasonably prolonged without reasonable suspicion. All the officer had was nervousness (belied by the video), one passenger had no bag in the car, and a single key was in the ignition. United States v. Flores, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Single key in the ignition adds nothing to RS

M.D.La.: Any exigency ended with def’s arrest; no facts showed others present

Any exigency involving defendant in his house evaporated when he was arrested and handcuffed. The mere possibility others are present can be exigency, but it requires pointing to actual facts, not possibilities. The court credits defendant’s own testimony damaging to … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Any exigency ended with def’s arrest; no facts showed others present

N.D.Ind.: Use of drug dog in hotel hallway wasn’t at all like invading the curtilage in Jardines

Use of a drug dog in a hotel hallway that produced an alert on defendant’s room’s door was not unreasonble under Jardines. A hotel hallway, accessible to many people, cannot be compared to the curtilage of a home. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Use of drug dog in hotel hallway wasn’t at all like invading the curtilage in Jardines

W.D.Ky.: Laptop in car was in plain view for seizure where there was PC it contained evidentiary information

Defendant’s laptop was in plain view when it was seized from his car when defendant was arrested because the police believed that stolen credit card information would be on it. United States v. Prado, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111954 (W.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Laptop in car was in plain view for seizure where there was PC it contained evidentiary information

D.Ore.: Gov’t’s mishandling of overseizure in Facebook SW didn’t prejudice defs so no suppression

The Facebook warrant was not overbroad, and it was consistent and less intrusive than a Facebook warrant previously approved by the Ninth Circuit in Flores. That which was nonresponsive to the warrant was previously ordered segregated and sealed, and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Overseizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Gov’t’s mishandling of overseizure in Facebook SW didn’t prejudice defs so no suppression