Defendant moves to suppress the search of his business because he claimed his consent was coerced. His specific claims of coercion are belied by the security video from the business. Denied. United States v. Hunt-Irving, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108253 (E.D. Pa. July 12, 2017).
Defendant can’t move to suppress his co-defendant’s stop when he wasn’t there. United States v. Garcia, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188501 (D. Minn. May 9, 2016).*
The government showed probable cause for a search warrant for defendant’s cell phones. United States v. Cruz, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188511 (D. Minn. May 9, 2016).*