S.D.N.Y.: Seizure of months of CSLI was proper to connect def to a particular place

Months of historical CSLI, rather than just three day’s worth, was properly acquired by the government to show defendant’s connections to the property at issue. The third party doctrine provides defendant no relief [yet]. United States v. Serrano, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112399 (S.D. N.Y. July 18, 2017).

Defendant was a mere passenger, and he has no standing to challenge the search of the car, despite his claiming a possessory interest in the firearm found inside. United States v. Taylor, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111895 (E.D. Wis. July 19, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Scope of search, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.