Author Archives: Hall

AP: “Man sits in jail when drywall powder is mistaken for cocaine” because a drug dog said it was cocaine

AP: Man sits in jail when drywall powder is mistaken for cocaine: OVIEDO, Fla. (AP) — A Florida man spent 90 days in jail after police officers who stopped him for driving without headlights said white powder found in his … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on AP: “Man sits in jail when drywall powder is mistaken for cocaine” because a drug dog said it was cocaine

KS declines to decide whether odor of MJ on the person is PC because here there was more than just that

Defendant didn’t dim headlights and officers stopped the car suspecting inattentive driving. The smell of marijuana coming from the car was obvious. “We decline the State’s offer to embark on a new legal proposition that would allow Kansas law enforcement … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on KS declines to decide whether odor of MJ on the person is PC because here there was more than just that

OH3: Narc told patrol officer def was drug suspect, and patrol officer ran DL and found it was suspended; stop valid despite pretext claim

A patrol officer was told that defendant was a drug suspect. He was told because he had stopped defendant before and was familiar with him. He ran defendant’s name through the state computer and it showed that defendant had no … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH3: Narc told patrol officer def was drug suspect, and patrol officer ran DL and found it was suspended; stop valid despite pretext claim

OH5: Working meth lab is exigency

Defendant was initially stopped with information from a CI amounting to reasonable suspicion that he was purchasing precursors and ingredients to manufacture methamphetamine. When the police got to his house, it was apparent there was a working meth lab, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH5: Working meth lab is exigency

MI: Electric company’s use of smart meters is not state action for 4A purposes

The electric company’s decision to install smart meters is not a Fourth Amendment issue because the company is a private actor. In re Consumers Energy Co., 2017 Mich. App. LEXIS 2161 (Oct. 10, 2017, published Dec. 28, 2017). The state … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MI: Electric company’s use of smart meters is not state action for 4A purposes

There are six pending SCOTUS Fourth Amendment cases

Six pending SCOTUS Fourth Amendment cases

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on There are six pending SCOTUS Fourth Amendment cases

NYTimes: The Failed War on Drugs

NYTimes: The Failed War on Drugs by George P. Shultz and Pedro Aspe:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: The Failed War on Drugs

Book on sale through midnight PT Jan. 2

Enter NEW2018 at checkout or Call 800.223.1940

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Book on sale through midnight PT Jan. 2

Today is [or maybe] the 414th anniversay of Semayne’s Case and judicial recognition of knock-and-announce and the castle doctrine

Today (as best as can be determined) is the 414th anniversary of Semayne’s Case recognizing both knock-and-announce and the castle doctrine at common law. Back then, the dates of decisions weren’t as important and they appeared in reporters well after … Continue reading →

Posted in Common law, Knock and announce, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Today is [or maybe] the 414th anniversay of Semayne’s Case and judicial recognition of knock-and-announce and the castle doctrine

OH6: Warrantless blood draw from believed to be dying motorcyclist valid

A warrantless blood draw from defendant was reasonable where, at the scene of his motorcycle accident on I-75 hitting the rear of a car when it was travelling approximately 102 in a 65 and killing his passenger throwing her 450′ … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Standing | Comments Off on OH6: Warrantless blood draw from believed to be dying motorcyclist valid

IN: DRE exam requires warning of right to counsel under state const.

The Indiana Constitution recognizes a right to warning that counsel may be consulted of a person in custody before a consent search is sought in Pirtle v. State, 323 N.E.2d 634 (Ind. 1975). That has been held not to apply … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: DRE exam requires warning of right to counsel under state const.

OR: Mobility is all that’s required for auto. exception under state const. too

As long as the vehicle was mobile and there was probable cause, the automobile exception applies. “In sum, the automobile exception applies in this case because defendant’s car was mobile when officers encountered it in connection with defendant’s felony arrest … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Mobility is all that’s required for auto. exception under state const. too

D.Nev.: Good cause shown for execution of SW at night because of neighborhood children

The government showed good cause for execution of a search warrant at night because of defendant’s house’s proximity to a school on break that would likely have kids around in the day in case the raid became violent. In any … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Nighttime search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Good cause shown for execution of SW at night because of neighborhood children

IL: ER dr. ordered forced catheterization from combative female for urine sample; wasn’t state action because two police officers helped hold her down

Defendant was involved in a vehicle accident and hospitalized. The ER doctor needed to know whether she was on drugs, and he ordered forced catheterization to get urine since defendant was combative. Two officers who also wanted to know whether … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Private search | Comments Off on IL: ER dr. ordered forced catheterization from combative female for urine sample; wasn’t state action because two police officers helped hold her down

OH2: Using a car protective spray on interior expecting a search to occur is tampering with evidence

Spraying a car interior protective spray on the inside of a car involved in a crime when expecting that a search would occur for fingerprints and DNA supported defendant’s conviction for tampering with evidence. State v. Scott, 2017-Ohio-9316, 2017 Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH2: Using a car protective spray on interior expecting a search to occur is tampering with evidence

PA: Alluding to a SCOTUS case without fleshing out how it applies held waiver when argument complicated

The defense didn’t properly frame its argument under Birchfield about forced implied consent and thus didn’t preserve error. “We cannot conclude that the trial court erred in denying Appellant’s suppression motion that vaguely cited to Birchfield.” Commonwealth v. Smith, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on PA: Alluding to a SCOTUS case without fleshing out how it applies held waiver when argument complicated

D.Md.: A SW for cell phone data going to Verizon in FL was within the court’s jurisdiction

Where the crime under investigation is in this district, it doesn’t matter that the search warrant for geolocation data from defendant’s cell phone is located in another district. The government can still get it by search warrant under Rule 41(b) … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: A SW for cell phone data going to Verizon in FL was within the court’s jurisdiction

CA10: Scope of consent to search has to be raised in the trial court

The issue of scope of a consent search has to be presented to the trial court to be preserved. This wasn’t. United States v. Vargas, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 26869 (10th Cir. Dec. 28, 2017). There is no right to … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA10: Scope of consent to search has to be raised in the trial court

M.D.Ala.: Conclusorily pleading a Franks violation isn’t a sufficient offer of proof

Defendant fails in his Franks argument for a failure of an offer of proof. Merely conclusorily stating the issue isn’t enough. There has to be context and how it was knowingly false. United States v. Martin, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Conclusorily pleading a Franks violation isn’t a sufficient offer of proof

CA10: Smell of MJ authorizes search for MJ, not looking at multiple credit cards

An anonymous caller said defendant was smoking marijuana on his car. This was reasonable suspicion at best. Assuming the smell of marijuana provides probable cause to search, the search was for marijuana, and inspecting credit cards unreasonably expanded the search. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA10: Smell of MJ authorizes search for MJ, not looking at multiple credit cards