CA10: Scope of consent to search has to be raised in the trial court

The issue of scope of a consent search has to be presented to the trial court to be preserved. This wasn’t. United States v. Vargas, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 26869 (10th Cir. Dec. 28, 2017).

There is no right to interlocutory appeal of a suppression motion in federal court. United States v. Cordero-Rosario, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 26936 (1st Cir. Aug. 21, 2017).

“CI’s unlicensed driving to the drug transaction” that led to a search warrant was not outrageous governmental conduct under the due process clause. United States v. Spicer, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 26685 (4th Cir. Dec. 27, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.