Author Archives: Hall

E.D.N.Y.: Def’s search incident of his backpack for fraudulent use of a Metrocard was valid at least on GFE and inevitable discovery

Defendant was stopped for using a school student’s Metrocard to get on the NYC subway because he looked and was a so older. His backpacked was removed, and he was handcuffed. His backpack was searched incident to his arrest. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def’s search incident of his backpack for fraudulent use of a Metrocard was valid at least on GFE and inevitable discovery

CA8: Parked RV was “vehicle on the premises” even though connected to water and electricity

A parked RV qualified as a “vehicle on the premises” even though it would have taken 30 minutes to make it ready to move. It had a satellite dish on the roof and it was connected to water and electricity. … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on CA8: Parked RV was “vehicle on the premises” even though connected to water and electricity

AR: State’s failure to get ruling on GFE below bars that argument on appeal; statute on BAC penalties violates Birchfield

Arkansas’s refusal to submit to a BAC test has criminal penalties, and it violates the Fourth Amendment. The trial court’s finding of voluntary consent was decided without an evidentiary hearing and is clearly erroneous. The state’s failure to get a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on AR: State’s failure to get ruling on GFE below bars that argument on appeal; statute on BAC penalties violates Birchfield

CA5: Search of wrong house by inadequate investigation means no QI

It was clearly established that search of the wrong house because of inadequate investigation violated the Fourth Amendment. Gerhart v. Barnes, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 10626 (5th Cir. Apr. 26, 2018), prior opinion Gerhart v. McLendon, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: Search of wrong house by inadequate investigation means no QI

Two on protective sweep

On plain error review, the protective sweep was reasonable. The officers had information that a suggested second person could have been in the house, and he or she hadn’t been found or found not to exist. United States v. Ford, … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on Two on protective sweep

E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW failed to show nexus, but GFE was enough to save it

“The bare assertion that defendant departed his home prior to engaging in a drug transaction does not ‘directly connect the residence with the suspected drug dealing activity.’ Id.” Peffer, 880 F.3d at 272-73 (quoting Brown, 828 F.3d at 383-84). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW failed to show nexus, but GFE was enough to save it

techdirt: Appeals Court: Driving Attentively While Black Isn’t Probable Cause For A Traffic Stop

techdirt: Appeals Court: Driving Attentively While Black Isn’t Probable Cause For A Traffic Stop by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on techdirt: Appeals Court: Driving Attentively While Black Isn’t Probable Cause For A Traffic Stop

Reason.com: The Golden State Killer and Your Genetic Privacy

Reason.com: The Golden State Killer and Your Genetic Privacy by Ronald Bailey “Any right of privacy in commercial DNA testers?” This was inevitable.

Posted in DNA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Reason.com: The Golden State Killer and Your Genetic Privacy

Vice: ICE Agents Should Know the Law, but They’re Fine with Warrantless Raids

Vice: ICE Agents Should Know the Law, but They’re Fine with Warrantless Raids by Eoin Higgins: A leaked training manual says officers should be familiar with Fourth Amendment procedures. So what explains their aggressive actions on a New York farm?

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on Vice: ICE Agents Should Know the Law, but They’re Fine with Warrantless Raids

The Verge: A pioneer in predictive policing is starting a troubling new project

The Verge: A pioneer in predictive policing is starting a troubling new project By Ali Winston and Ingrid Burrington:

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on The Verge: A pioneer in predictive policing is starting a troubling new project

NYTimes: Women Describe Invasive Strip Searches on Visits to City Jails

NYTimes: Women Describe Invasive Strip Searches on Visits to City Jails by Jan Ransom:

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NYTimes: Women Describe Invasive Strip Searches on Visits to City Jails

NJ: Video of stop showed voluntariness of consent; fact officer mentioned getting a warrant was justified on facts

The video of the stop showed the consent was valid. At first it was denied, then it was granted. The officer’s mention of a search warrant was justified because of the smell of marijuana, and that did not make the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on NJ: Video of stop showed voluntariness of consent; fact officer mentioned getting a warrant was justified on facts

NY3: Forced prison body cavity search was unreasonable

Defendant’s forced body cavity search in prison was unreasonable under all the circumstances. People v. Holton, 2018 NY Slip Op 02836, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2830 (3d Dist. Apr. 26, 2018):

Posted in Body searches, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY3: Forced prison body cavity search was unreasonable

D.D.C.: Drug testing school teachers violated 4A

Drug testing of some school teachers in the District of Columbia violated the reasonable expectation of privacy and didn’t serve government interests. There was no indication one group of teachers (really small kids) even deserved to be included for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Drug testing school teachers violated 4A

AZ: Statutory GFE interpreted same as 4A GFE absent reason not to

The state’s statutory good faith exception is coextensive with the Fourth Amendment good faith exception, absent a compelling argument from the defendant. A pre-Birchfield breath test was valid under the good faith exception of Davis, already applied in Arizona. Alsarraf … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on AZ: Statutory GFE interpreted same as 4A GFE absent reason not to

CO: Def was ticketed, but car was impounded without reasonable justification; suppressed

Defendant was issued a citation for a traffic offense, and then the officers decided to impound his car. There was no justification for the impoundment, and the search of the vehicle is suppressed. People v. Brown, 2018 CO 27, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CO: Def was ticketed, but car was impounded without reasonable justification; suppressed

W.D.Ky.: Backup officer to traffic stop immediately used drug dog, and that wasn’t unreasonable

Defendants’ failure to stop at stop signs was justification for the stop. A backup officer with a drug dog did a dog sniff around the car while the basic stuff of the traffic stop was being done. This did not … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Backup officer to traffic stop immediately used drug dog, and that wasn’t unreasonable

CA10: Under the Franks doctrine, relevance doesn’t equate with materiality; district court erred in finding Franks violation from omission of report

Under the Franks doctrine, relevance doesn’t equate with materiality. Defendant was the target of a health fraud investigation with a detailed affidavit that omitted a reference to a letter from state regulators that made no reference to health care fraud. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Under the Franks doctrine, relevance doesn’t equate with materiality; district court erred in finding Franks violation from omission of report

E.D.Mich.: A 16 year old girl, over the age of consent, was in a hotel room with a 45 year old man; that alone was not exigency

A 16 year old girl, over the age of consent, was in a hotel room with a 45 year old man. That alone did not create exigent circumstances. Certainly the parents would be concerned, but there was no evidence that … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: A 16 year old girl, over the age of consent, was in a hotel room with a 45 year old man; that alone was not exigency

OH6: Challenge to credibility of one witness at suppression hearing wasn’t the PC challenge made on appeal

A challenge in the trial court that one of the officers wasn’t credible isn’t the same argument as there being a failure of probable cause. Therefore, the probable cause issue hasn’t been preserved. State v. Gibbs, 2018-Ohio-1549, 2018 Ohio App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH6: Challenge to credibility of one witness at suppression hearing wasn’t the PC challenge made on appeal