Author Archives: Hall

NYTimes: Thermostats, Locks and Lights: Digital Tools of Domestic Abuse

NYTimes: Thermostats, Locks and Lights: Digital Tools of Domestic Abuse by Nellie Bowles Internet-connected home devices that are marketed as the newest conveniences are also being used to harass, monitor and control.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Thermostats, Locks and Lights: Digital Tools of Domestic Abuse

WaPo: Editorial: Congress must reckon with the Fourth Amendment and new technology

WaPo: Editorial: Congress must reckon with the Fourth Amendment and new technology A 5-to-4 decision suggests the Supreme Court’s view of “unreasonable searches” is evolving. The House and Senate should clarify the legal standard.

Posted in SCOTUS, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Editorial: Congress must reckon with the Fourth Amendment and new technology

DE: Facebook messages def was reselling MMJ was part of the PC

A medical marijuana provider told police that it appeared that defendant was reselling that which she acquired legally. They messaged her through Facebook as a potential buyer, and she essentially admitted it. The search warrant was issued on probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on DE: Facebook messages def was reselling MMJ was part of the PC

D.Mass.: USMJ’s spouse’s employment as a doctor at a related institution that was a victim doesn’t make her not neutral and detached when she signs SW

The USMJ here was still neutral and detached. The victim of the crime was a non-profit associated with Harvard. Her husband worked as a doctor for hospital associated with Harvard. That wasn’t a close enough relationship to require recusal. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Mass.: USMJ’s spouse’s employment as a doctor at a related institution that was a victim doesn’t make her not neutral and detached when she signs SW

N.D.Cal.: Def’s parole search on erroneous dispatch report def was on parole means no exclusion under Herring

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and dispatch said he was on parole which meant he was subject to search. He wasn’t on parole, but the officer’s good faith reliance on the dispatch report under Herring means no suppression. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Def’s parole search on erroneous dispatch report def was on parole means no exclusion under Herring

TN: Not IAC to strategically forgo motion to suppress rather than lose plea offer

Defense counsel didn’t provide ineffective assistance of counsel where he didn’t file a motion to suppress because the prosecutor would withdraw the plea offer, and he concluded it wouldn’t be worth the risk. Wilson v. State, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Not IAC to strategically forgo motion to suppress rather than lose plea offer

OH3: Def counsel not ineffective for strategy not to challenge car search to distance him from the drugs for trial

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress because he would have to admit he owned or possessed the car for standing, and that was contrary to his defense that it wasn’t his drugs. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH3: Def counsel not ineffective for strategy not to challenge car search to distance him from the drugs for trial

FL2: Using an antennae to steal wifi that the police traced back didn’t violate a REP

Police obtained information that child pornography was downloaded via an IP address. They searched the computers there, finding none. They investigated further and found defendant was a neighbor who was using a Yagi antennae to obtain radio access to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on FL2: Using an antennae to steal wifi that the police traced back didn’t violate a REP

CA2: A material witness seized and never presented to a judge stated a claim; and no QI

Plaintiff was held without a hearing as an alleged material witness, but never presented to a court. The district court granted qualified immunity, and the court of appeals reversed. Her rights were clearly established that she was entitled to be … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: A material witness seized and never presented to a judge stated a claim; and no QI

SCOTUS rejects warrantless cellphone location tracking in Carpenter v. United States

SCOTUS rejects warrantless cellphone location tracking in Carpenter v. United States, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3844 (U.S. June 22, 2018) (5-4). Gorsuch “dissents,” but it reads like a concurrence, which parallels his questions at oral argument, and he agrees with Justice … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on SCOTUS rejects warrantless cellphone location tracking in Carpenter v. United States

OR: Guest standing is functional to the relationship to the residence and here didn’t cover under the back steps

Guest standing has a functional element. Defendant was a guest in the home of another and their relationship was founded on drugs. While defendant would have standing in the home, he didn’t under the back steps, where, incidentally, he’d been … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Guest standing is functional to the relationship to the residence and here didn’t cover under the back steps

CA3: No REP from police being in a hotel hallway and then having RS for a frisk

The odor of marijuana coming from defendant’s hotel room was reasonable suspicion for his later stop and frisk in the hallway. “Appellant’s brief could also be read to assert that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to patrol the motel hallway. … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: No REP from police being in a hotel hallway and then having RS for a frisk

DC (en banc): Way off topic but important: Possibility of deportation makes a “petty” offense “serious” and requires a jury trial

Bado v. United States, 2018 D.C. App. LEXIS 258 (June 21, 2018) (en banc):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on DC (en banc): Way off topic but important: Possibility of deportation makes a “petty” offense “serious” and requires a jury trial

D.D.C.: Manafort DC search valid: The person on the lease of a storage unit and with the keys had [apparent] authority to consent

The search of Paul Manafort’s storage unit was with the consent of the person on the lease and did not violate the Fourth Amendment. It was reasonable for the FBI to believe that the person with the keys had the … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Manafort DC search valid: The person on the lease of a storage unit and with the keys had [apparent] authority to consent

CA7: In the private search doctrine and QI, it’s not clearly established that the actors knowing each other isn’t enough

“But for purposes of official immunity, the question is whether existing law clearly establishes that a private search is treated as a governmental search when the public and private actors are friends and potential future coworkers.” It does not. There … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: In the private search doctrine and QI, it’s not clearly established that the actors knowing each other isn’t enough

CA2: There was no heightened expectation of privacy under Collins v. Virginia in a multi-family parking lot

Collins doesn’t provide a heightened expectation of privacy in a multi-family parking lot. “Jones does not dispute that the Dodge Magnum was inherently mobile. … We hold that the officers had probable cause to search the Dodge Magnum and that … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA2: There was no heightened expectation of privacy under Collins v. Virginia in a multi-family parking lot

MS: Issuing a SW for a person with a similar name a decade earlier didn’t make magistrate not neutral and detached

The fact the issuing judge issued another for a relative a decade earlier didn’t show the judge was not a neutral and detached magistrate. There was probable cause for this search warrant. Donaldson v. State, 2018 Miss. App. LEXIS 303 … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause | Comments Off on MS: Issuing a SW for a person with a similar name a decade earlier didn’t make magistrate not neutral and detached

ABAJ: FBI overestimated the number of encrypted phones while arguing for workarounds

ABAJ: FBI overestimated the number of encrypted phones while arguing for workarounds by Jason Tashea:

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ABAJ: FBI overestimated the number of encrypted phones while arguing for workarounds

D.Mont.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing

“Rankin claimed counsel should have sought to suppress some of the evidence used at sentencing, but the exclusionary rule does not apply at sentencing.” United States v. Rankin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100129 (D. Mont. June 15, 2018). The affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing

CA11: The officer received easily verifiable information that the tattoo on the suspect didn’t match the tattoos of the perpetrator; the arrest was without PC

Before the arrest the officer received easily verifiable exculpatory information from a witness, that the citizen’s single tattoo did not match the multiple tattoos visible on the perpetrator in the crime scene photograph that the officer showed the witness. Despite … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: The officer received easily verifiable information that the tattoo on the suspect didn’t match the tattoos of the perpetrator; the arrest was without PC