Author Archives: Hall

DE: Police corroborated masked juvenile robber’s identity enough to get SW for his place

Defendant juvenile was in a Walgreens with his stepfather, and the sales clerk suspected he’d robbed them two weeks earlier wearing the same clothes. The Walgreens reward number of the father was used to track the address of the juvenile. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: Police corroborated masked juvenile robber’s identity enough to get SW for his place

D.Md.: Excessive force faction of 4A does not apply to property damage claims

The excessive force faction of the Fourth Amendment does not apply to property damage claims. Quality Care Daycare Bup, LLC v. Jones, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166292 (D. Md. Sep. 27, 2018). [Plead unreasonableness] In a scheme involving fraudulently obtaining … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Md.: Excessive force faction of 4A does not apply to property damage claims

N.D.Ohio: Parole officers’ clinical reports didn’t have any of the added color at the suppression hearing, so the court doesn’t credit their testimony

“Based upon the totality of the circumstances and the Court’s assessment of the credibility of the parole officers, the Court finds that the [parole authority] lacked reasonable suspicion to search Neff’s cell phone. The results of the search, therefore, must … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Parole officers’ clinical reports didn’t have any of the added color at the suppression hearing, so the court doesn’t credit their testimony

E.D.Pa.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI survives with GFE; Riley didn’t foretell Carpenter

Defendant was a suspect in a series of bank robberies, and a court order was obtained for his CSLI in 2016. Defendant’s argument that Riley foretold Carpenter is rejected. It wasn’t enough to forecast a clear outcome. The good faith … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI survives with GFE; Riley didn’t foretell Carpenter

N.D.Okla.: Arrest inside the door permitted protective sweep

The arrest of the codefendant inside house permitted a protective sweep. United States v. Jones, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166347 (N.D. Okla. Sep. 27, 2018). “These nine ineffective assistance of counsel claims are properly evaluated under the Strickland standard, meaning … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Arrest inside the door permitted protective sweep

TX2: A tin can in hand was “associated with the person” for search incident purposes

A tin can in defendant’s hand and dropped as she was handcuffed was “associated with the person” for search incident purposes. Texas recognizes larger items may not be “associated with the person” v. smaller items more easily held. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on TX2: A tin can in hand was “associated with the person” for search incident purposes

IA: No IAC for not challenging evidence obtained in another state where state law was more defense favorable; can’t show outcome would be different

Defendant was arrested in Nebraska, and Iowa authorities sought his DNA there to connect him to an Iowa crime. Nebraska’s standard for obtaining DNA is less demanding. He can’t show on post-conviction that defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IA: No IAC for not challenging evidence obtained in another state where state law was more defense favorable; can’t show outcome would be different

W.D.N.Y.: A knock-and-talk can lead to seizure of a computer on exigency

After a few bizarre sexual Aol chat sessions, defendant was seeking communication from minors for sex. The police were informed and did a knock-and-talk, and he admitted the communiques and that the laptop in the room was the one involved. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: A knock-and-talk can lead to seizure of a computer on exigency

AR: Argument that SW was required not subpoena for text messages that came day after admission into evidence was waived

The defense argument that text messages were obtained by subpoena not search warrant was not preserved for review when the defense waited until the next day to object. Even if it had been preserved, the argument wasn’t fully developed, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on AR: Argument that SW was required not subpoena for text messages that came day after admission into evidence was waived

N.D.Ind.: Franks requires attaching affidavit to the motion to suppress

Defendant’s Franks request for an evidentiary hearing without attaching the affidavit for the search warrant is denied without prejudice. The court has nothing to compare. United States v. Carswell, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165132 (N.D. Ind. Sep. 26, 2018). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Franks requires attaching affidavit to the motion to suppress

IA: Even removing the CI’s information from the affidavit, there was still PC for the search

“Even if we were to excise the complained of information–the information obtained from anonymous tipsters and the references in the warrant application concerning sightings of Gully at the residence in previous years–the issuing magistrate still had a substantial basis for … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on IA: Even removing the CI’s information from the affidavit, there was still PC for the search

E.D.Mo.: Of course the SW was signed, so def counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising it

“Eason’s counsel was not ineffective for failing to allege that the search warrant was not signed by the affiant because the Court’s records clearly demonstrate that it was. Had that not been the case, the Court who carefully examined the … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Of course the SW was signed, so def counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising it

The Atlantic: The Always-On Police Camera

The Atlantic: The Always-On Police Camera by Sidney Fussell: Body cameras that automatically activate in response to the sound of gunfire could forever change people’s expectations about public spaces.

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on The Atlantic: The Always-On Police Camera

Cal.1: Electronic probation search condition challenge forfeited

Defendant minor’s electronic probation search condition challenge was forfeited. In re L.O., 2018 Cal. App. LEXIS 863 (1st Dist. Sep. 26, 2018).* Defendant was on supervised release, and there was reasonable suspicion for his probation search: A CI said he … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1: Electronic probation search condition challenge forfeited

D.Minn.: Affidavit at scene of execution of SW helps narrow its overbreadth

“Given the scope and pervasiveness of the fraud alleged, the search warrant issued for Ms. Natysin’s home was not overly broad.” “This finding is supported in part by the fact the affidavit accompanied the warrant to the search and was … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Affidavit at scene of execution of SW helps narrow its overbreadth

NY1: Even if the SW was overbroad, the remainder seized all supports the conviction

“Even assuming that the warrant’s authorization for the seizure and search of cell phones and other electronic devices was somewhat overbroad, the balance of the warrant, pursuant to which evidence implicating defendant in two of the charged robberies was recovered, … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth | Comments Off on NY1: Even if the SW was overbroad, the remainder seized all supports the conviction

E.D.Tex.: The number of people reviewing an affidavit for SW is relevant to GFE

The affidavit was not bare bones, and it provided a nexus to the place to be searched. In addition, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Taylor, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164231 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2018), adopted, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: The number of people reviewing an affidavit for SW is relevant to GFE

CA7: Officer at trial twice referring to def as “target” of search wasn’t reversible where court ordered jury to disregard

A police officer at trial twice referred to defendant as the “target of a search warrant.” The first was on direct and ordered struck and the jury directed to disregard. It happened again during cross of the same witness. Same … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on CA7: Officer at trial twice referring to def as “target” of search wasn’t reversible where court ordered jury to disregard

MN: Another’s outside storage unit at an apartment building found because its key was found during a search of the apt couldn’t be searched under apt SW

An apartment of another was searched under a warrant, and a key to a storage unit was found. The storage unit was nearby but not in the apartment, and it was in defendant’s name. Searching the storage unit in another … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Scope of search | Comments Off on MN: Another’s outside storage unit at an apartment building found because its key was found during a search of the apt couldn’t be searched under apt SW

CO: Def’s DNA was unlawfully collected in a juvenile proceeding and entered into CODIS, and the exclusionary rule is applied

Defendant’s DNA was unlawfully collected in a juvenile proceeding that was ultimately dismissed with deferral. It wasn’t removed from CODIS, and defendant was later linked to a carjacking from his DNA. The exclusionary rule is applied because the first search … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CO: Def’s DNA was unlawfully collected in a juvenile proceeding and entered into CODIS, and the exclusionary rule is applied