Author Archives: Hall

W.D.Tenn.: Putting a wildlife camera on ptf’s open fields wasn’t a violation of the 4A

Officers putting a wildlife camera on plaintiff’s open fields wasn’t a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Hollingsworth v. Tenn. Wildlife Res. Agency, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181311 (W.D. Tenn. Oct. 21, 2019):

Posted in Open fields | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Putting a wildlife camera on ptf’s open fields wasn’t a violation of the 4A

MA well explains the totality of circumstances test applied to police-citizen contacts

Massachusetts well explains the totality of circumstances test applied to what a civilian would find an inherently coercive police citizen contact but the courts hardly ever do. Commonwealth v. Matta, 2019 Mass. LEXIS 582 (Oct. 21, 2019):

Posted in Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA well explains the totality of circumstances test applied to police-citizen contacts

GA: Retrieval of data from airbag control module after car wreck was search requiring warrant

Warrantless retrieval of data from the airbag control module (ACM) from a vehicle after a car crash was a search that required a warrant. Mobley v. State, 2019 Ga. LEXIS 694 (Oct. 21, 2019).

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on GA: Retrieval of data from airbag control module after car wreck was search requiring warrant

W.D.La.: Dismissal of indictment is not remedy for DEA allegedly violating its policy manual, even if it did

Defendant’s general allegation that the DEA officers violated their own policy manual isn’t specific and doesn’t even rise to the level of dismissal of the indictment, which is what he alleges. “Indeed, the Supreme Court has held that violations of … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Dismissal of indictment is not remedy for DEA allegedly violating its policy manual, even if it did

M.D.Pa.: Despite appearance building was multi-unit, SW was still particular because it alleged he was in control

The search warrant was sufficiently particular despite there being more than one entrance to the building and the fact there were multiple electric boxes outside. Based on what the officers knew, it was either one or all under his control. … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Despite appearance building was multi-unit, SW was still particular because it alleged he was in control

NYTimes: Opinion: Why We Must Ban Facial Recognition Software Now

NYTimes: Opinion: Why We Must Ban Facial Recognition Software Now by Evan Selinger and Woodrow Hartzog (“The benefits do not come close to outweighing the risks.”) Daily Beast: Border Agents Could Get Bodycams With Facial Recognition Technology by Blake Montgomery … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Opinion: Why We Must Ban Facial Recognition Software Now

NYTimes: Woman Who Said Officer Removed Her Tampon Will Receive $205,000

NYTimes: Woman Who Said Officer Removed Her Tampon Will Receive $205,000 by Isabella Kwai (“San Antonio approved the payout to Natalie Simms, 40, who said in a lawsuit that the officer violated her rights during a cavity search on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches | Comments Off on NYTimes: Woman Who Said Officer Removed Her Tampon Will Receive $205,000

E.D.Tenn.: Def who came to motel room to “turn up, smoke, and chill” and to examine a firearm he was considering buying didn’t have standing

“Penn stated that his purpose in coming to the room was to ‘turn up, smoke, and chill’ and to examine a firearm he was considering purchasing.” He said he napped there. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def who came to motel room to “turn up, smoke, and chill” and to examine a firearm he was considering buying didn’t have standing

E.D.Wis.: Police allegely entered curtilage to shine headlights in windows, and homeowner consented to entry; def was inside and without standing to contest

Defendant contended that police drove onto the curtilage and shined police headlights and lights into the premises. The USMJ couldn’t adequately resolve that because of a lack of photographic evidence showing what was where. But, that led to a consent … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Police allegely entered curtilage to shine headlights in windows, and homeowner consented to entry; def was inside and without standing to contest

S.D.Ind.: Stalking horse rationale for PO’s cover for LEOs in search not universally accepted, and there was RS for this search anyway

Analyzing all the probation and parole search cases, the court finds defendant’s claim that probation was really a “stalking horse” for ATF unavailing. He had a reduced expectation of privacy and that there was reasonable suspicion for the search in … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Stalking horse rationale for PO’s cover for LEOs in search not universally accepted, and there was RS for this search anyway

W.D.Pa.: Def was not an overnight guest, but his connection to the property was substantial, he had a key, and he could come and go at will, so that’s sufficient

On the spectrum of standing from overnight guest to somebody with minimal connection to the premises, defendant was not an overnight guest, but he had a key and pretty much free reign over the premises. The court concludes he had … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Def was not an overnight guest, but his connection to the property was substantial, he had a key, and he could come and go at will, so that’s sufficient

CA11: Public safety exception permitted entry of hotel room on PC to neutralize a firearm

Defense counsel’s failure to object to the search of his hotel room wasn’t prejudicial because inevitable discovery applied. He was accused of brandishing a gun shortly before, and the gun hadn’t been found. Officers had probable cause to get a … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA11: Public safety exception permitted entry of hotel room on PC to neutralize a firearm

NY3: Strip search after a frisk not justified merely for drug arrest; must be RS drugs on person, and here there wasn’t

Defendant had been frisked, and there’s no justification in New York for a strip search of all drug defendants without more information, at least reasonable suspicion, that drugs are actually secreted on the person. That was lacking here. People v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on NY3: Strip search after a frisk not justified merely for drug arrest; must be RS drugs on person, and here there wasn’t

N.D.Cal.: Arrest warrants don’t grow stale like SWs

The officer had probable cause to arrest defendant and conduct a search incident to arrest. Thus, the question of probation search is moot. The passage of time (here a little over two months) between knowledge of the arrest warrant and … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Immigration arrests, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Arrest warrants don’t grow stale like SWs

CO: Traffic stop alone isn’t a seizure of the passenger under Brendlin unless more happens

“Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249, 263, 127 S. Ct. 2400, 168 L. Ed. 2d 132 (2007), abrogated only the holding in People v. Fines, 127 P.3d 79, 81 (Colo. 2006), that passengers in a lawfully stopped vehicle are not … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CO: Traffic stop alone isn’t a seizure of the passenger under Brendlin unless more happens

D.Ariz.: Def had no REP against use of a zooming pole camera across from the front of his house

The DEA set up a pole camera across the street from defendant’s house to watch the comings and goings expecting a car to go to New Mexico with drugs. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what the camera … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Def had no REP against use of a zooming pole camera across from the front of his house

LA4: Nervousness and furtiveness of person clutching bag on Bourbon St during Halloween crowd justified stop to check for weapons

It was Halloween on Bourbon Street, which is the largest crowd in New Orleans other than Mardi Gras. Defendant was stopped for his suspicious behavior on seeing EMS personnel, and he quickened his pace and tucked his bag under his … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on LA4: Nervousness and furtiveness of person clutching bag on Bourbon St during Halloween crowd justified stop to check for weapons

OR: A question to a fidgety driver about weapons in the car didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

Defendant was pulled over after passing a parked police car three times, and the officer seeing the tags were expired on the third pass. When defendant was pulled over, he was unusually fidgety. A question about weapons in the car … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: A question to a fidgety driver about weapons in the car didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

CA5: Franks doesn’t neatly apply to § 1983 because the question there is just probable cause

Plaintiff was arrested for capital murder based on an affidavit for arrest that omitted serious doubts about the eyewitness’s identification. Later, the charge was dropped, and plaintiff sued the affiant for a “civil Franks violation.” Franks doesn’t neatly apply in … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA5: Franks doesn’t neatly apply to § 1983 because the question there is just probable cause

OR: Order to produce passcode to an iPhone seeks testimonial evidence

Defendant was held in contempt for not providing the passcode to access his cell phone. The court of appeals affirms. Entering a passcode into a smartphone is testimonial in nature. The Fifth Amendment’s foregone conclusion doctrine as to knowledge of … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on OR: Order to produce passcode to an iPhone seeks testimonial evidence