Author Archives: Hall

NH: Tenant showed a REP in apt building’s utility closet, but not in vestibule

On the totality under the state constitution, defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy for a pair of wet boots hidden in a utility closet in an apartment building’s vestibule closet. He manifested the expectation of privacy by his actions, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NH: Tenant showed a REP in apt building’s utility closet, but not in vestibule

IN: Admin. inspector’s entry onto yard for housing code violation didn’t violate 4A

A city inspector followed state statute and entered upon a homeowner’s property after he saw a deck and above ground pool being built in violation of the local housing code. The entry was reasonable and did not require a administrative … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Admin. inspector’s entry onto yard for housing code violation didn’t violate 4A

E.D.Va.: Attorney memorandum could be seized in plain view during search; 5A privilege was waived

In a criminal copyright infringement case, a search warrant issued, and the police seized an attorney memorandum in plain view. The court finds the attorney-client privilege was waived by prior disclosure to others. United States v. Dallmann, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Attorney memorandum could be seized in plain view during search; 5A privilege was waived

ProPublica: Police Say Seizing Property Without Trial Helps Keep Crime Down. A New Study Shows They’re Wrong.

ProPublica: Police Say Seizing Property Without Trial Helps Keep Crime Down. A New Study Shows They’re Wrong. By Ian McDougall (“Civil asset forfeiture laws, which allow police to seize property without trial, are frequently justified as tools to seize millions … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on ProPublica: Police Say Seizing Property Without Trial Helps Keep Crime Down. A New Study Shows They’re Wrong.

OH6: When lack of PC for a SW is the issue, a suppression hearing isn’t required: it’s a question of law

When the defendant moves to suppress a search warrant claiming only a lack of probable cause, a hearing isn’t required. It’s then a mixed question of law and fact (mostly law). State v. Holt, 2020-Ohio-6649, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4515 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH6: When lack of PC for a SW is the issue, a suppression hearing isn’t required: it’s a question of law

OR: Questions about drugs without RS during a traffic stop exceeded the basis of the stop

“ Officers conducting a traffic stop may only conduct investigation unrelated to that traffic stop if they have independent constitutional justification for further inquiries. Neither line of inquiry here (first, whether defendant had drugs, and second whether she illegally possessed … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OR: Questions about drugs without RS during a traffic stop exceeded the basis of the stop

N.D.Ohio: Lack of CI’s track record can be overlooked with corroboration of the story

The CI’s track record wasn’t disclosed but the corrobation was. Probable cause was shown. “Here, Detective Shelton’s affidavit established probable cause. Shelton’s affidavit relayed the informant’s statement that Defendant Butts was manufacturing Fentanyl tablets using Drug Mart brand pain medication. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Lack of CI’s track record can be overlooked with corroboration of the story

Today is Bill of Rights Day

December 15, 1791 the Bill of Rights was ratified by the states, 229 years ago.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Today is Bill of Rights Day

CA3: Pro se ptf stated claim for warrantless entry into his house

The district court erred in summarily dismissing plaintiff’s case at § 1915A screening for failure to state a claim, because he did in the attempted amended complaint. “Edwards alleged that Rice lacked a search warrant when she conducted an investigation … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on CA3: Pro se ptf stated claim for warrantless entry into his house

PA: On PCR, def has to call the third-party consenter as a witness to attempt to show lack of consent

On post-conviction review, defendant didn’t call as a witness the person who consented to the entry to testify that she did so involuntarily. Therefore, he failed in his burden of proof. Defendant was properly subjected to a DV arrest, even … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Standards of review | Comments Off on PA: On PCR, def has to call the third-party consenter as a witness to attempt to show lack of consent

N.D.Iowa: SI to arrest can support search even when officers choose not to arrest at that moment

The search incident exception supported the search here because it was factually and legally appropriate except for the fact that the actual arrest didn’t occur until months later. The officers chose not to arrest at that moment. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: SI to arrest can support search even when officers choose not to arrest at that moment

TX14: SW for car with only color, 4 doors, and race and gender of driver in Houston was not particular

All the police had was the color of the sedan, its number of doors, and the race and gender of its driver to indicate that the sedan in the affidavit was the same sedan as the one seen in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on TX14: SW for car with only color, 4 doors, and race and gender of driver in Houston was not particular

NE: Search of def’s car valid under automobile exception where he was late for third controlled buy

When defendant didn’t show up for his third controlled buy, police went to him and searched his car finding the drugs. They had probable cause for that search under the automobile exception. State v. Garza, 29 Neb. App. 223 (Dec. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause | Comments Off on NE: Search of def’s car valid under automobile exception where he was late for third controlled buy

E.D.Wis.: Seizure under SW not 5A taking

A seizure under a search warrant is not a Fifth Amendment taking. Woods v. Milwaukee Cty. Dist. Atty’s Office, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231416 (E.D. Wis. Dec. 9, 2020). Defense counsel was not ineffective for not raising defendant’s search issue … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Seizure under SW not 5A taking

W.D.Tenn.: Asking a series of questions during a stop didn’t unreasonably lengthen it

“Detective Redding then asked Mason whether he had anything in the Vehicle that the officers should know about, and Detective Kent asked Defendant what he was doing, where he had been, where he was going, whether he had been previously … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Asking a series of questions during a stop didn’t unreasonably lengthen it

M.D.Pa.: Traffic stop may be highly technical, but it still has a factual and legal basis

“Although many reasonable people may agree that the stop at issue here was a highly technical, ‘ticky-tacky’ sort of traffic stop, there is no doubt that Florida law requires a driver to stop at a clearly marked stop line before … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Traffic stop may be highly technical, but it still has a factual and legal basis

NY2: State couldn’t concede no PC in trial court but argue there was on appeal

The state conceded a lack of probable cause in the trial court when the automobile exception was at issue. On appeal, they argued against that concession, which they could not do. “Accordingly, the Supreme Court should not have denied the … Continue reading →

Posted in Waiver | Comments Off on NY2: State couldn’t concede no PC in trial court but argue there was on appeal

techspot: Schools are using FBI hacking tools to access students’ phones

techspot: Schools are using FBI hacking tools to access students’ phones by Isaiah Mayersen (“A damning Gizmodo report has revealed that numerous school districts have purchased the digital tools the FBI use, and are leveling them against students. Even without … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on techspot: Schools are using FBI hacking tools to access students’ phones

CA8 finds stop valid for grounds not relied on by Dist. Ct.

“The government defends the district court’s rationale, but argues alternatively that other facts independently provided reasonable suspicion to seize LaGrange in the restaurant parking area. We may affirm the district court’s denial of a motion to suppress on any ground … Continue reading →

Posted in Standards of review, Waiver | Comments Off on CA8 finds stop valid for grounds not relied on by Dist. Ct.

CO: Judicial officer who leaked info about SW he signed was censured, but only after removal from office, a federal obstruction conviction, and disbarment

The respondent former judge told a friend to avoid a certain person when a drug task force search warrant was signed by him for the target. He was federally charged and pled guilty to obstruction of justice and was disbarred … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CO: Judicial officer who leaked info about SW he signed was censured, but only after removal from office, a federal obstruction conviction, and disbarment