Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Cal.: If bumping def on a bike was a seizure, it ended when he ran away

The officer bumped defendant on a bike. It was potentially a seizure, but “Under Hodari D. and Torres, the seizure thus ended when Daniels got up and began running down the driveway.” United States v. Daniels, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: If bumping def on a bike was a seizure, it ended when he ran away

CA5: GFE applies to showing of nexus

The good faith exception applies to the warrant affidavit’s showing of nexus. The showing wasn’t great, but it was sufficient to not be bare bones. The officer adequately connected defendant to the premises. United States v. Jackson, 2022 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: GFE applies to showing of nexus

CA7: Despite govt’s not raising abandonment, the court finds it anyway

The government conceded no abandonment and sought other exceptions to the warrant requirement. The court of appeals finds abandonment anyway because the record is clear. In addition, an allegation of a Franks violation fails without alleging that probable cause does … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on CA7: Despite govt’s not raising abandonment, the court finds it anyway

Plead the Fifth Podcast: “May I search your phone, with good faith?”

Plead the Fifth Podcast: “May I search your phone, with good faith?” (“Can a police officer search a criminal suspect’s cell phone in full, when the only charge in the warrant was drug possession, and the affidavit provided barebone justification? … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Plead the Fifth Podcast: “May I search your phone, with good faith?”

CA7: Detention after conviction is a due process question, not 4A question

Plaintiff’s detention after conviction is a due process issue (if at all) and not a Fourth Amendment issue. Jones v. York, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 13090 (7th Cir. May 16, 2022):

Posted in Due process | Comments Off on CA7: Detention after conviction is a due process question, not 4A question

CA3: Younger abstention applies to bar federal litigation of red-flag gun seizure case

Greco v. Bruck, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 13074 (3d Cir. May 13, 2022), prior opinion Greco v. Bruck, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 33660 (3d Cir. Nov. 12, 2021) (posted here) reaffirms that state court proceedings bar federal litigation in a … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA3: Younger abstention applies to bar federal litigation of red-flag gun seizure case

CA5: SW affidavit at trial violated confrontation

The government violated the confrontation clause by putting into evidence a search warrant affidavit to seek to give context to the CS’s dealings with defendant. If that’s so important, then the government should call him. United States v. Hamann, 2022 … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on CA5: SW affidavit at trial violated confrontation

OH1: Doing nothing unusual or criminal 5 minutes after ShotSpotter alert wasn’t RS

Officers found defendant putting his kids in his car about five minutes after a ShotSpotter alert where no one had complained of gunfire. His ultimate frisk lacked reasonable suspicion. State v. Henson, 2022-Ohio-1571, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 1482 (1st Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Doing nothing unusual or criminal 5 minutes after ShotSpotter alert wasn’t RS

CA11: Health care fraud records SW permitted search of VCR tapes

After a year long investigation, officers obtained a search warrant for defendant’s medical clinic for health care fraud. They found videotapes in a cluttered backroom, and, based on the warrant, believed that they could contain evidence of the alleged fraud. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA11: Health care fraud records SW permitted search of VCR tapes

EFF: Geofence Warrants and Reverse Keyword Warrants are So Invasive, Even Big Tech Wants to Ban Them

EFF: Geofence Warrants and Reverse Keyword Warrants are So Invasive, Even Big Tech Wants to Ban Them by Matthew Guariglia (“Geofence and reverse keyword warrants are some of the most dangerous, civil-liberties-infringing and reviled tools in law enforcement agencies’ digital … Continue reading →

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on EFF: Geofence Warrants and Reverse Keyword Warrants are So Invasive, Even Big Tech Wants to Ban Them

Scientific American: Yes, Phones Can Reveal if Someone Gets an Abortion

Scientific American: Yes, Phones Can Reveal if Someone Gets an Abortion by Sophie Bushwick (“To protect personal information from companies that sell data, some individuals are relying on privacy guides instead of government regulation or industry transparency.”)

Posted in Cell site location information, Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Scientific American: Yes, Phones Can Reveal if Someone Gets an Abortion

Rawstory: Georgia deputies infuriate school officials with ‘humiliating’ roadside search of Black lacrosse team’s luggage (updated)

Rawstory: Georgia deputies infuriate school officials with ‘humiliating’ roadside search of Black lacrosse team’s luggage by Travis Gettys:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Rawstory: Georgia deputies infuriate school officials with ‘humiliating’ roadside search of Black lacrosse team’s luggage (updated)

ID: Calling for drug dog before RS existed extended the stop

During the traffic stop, the diversion to call for a drug dog was without reasonable suspicion and it extended the stop. State v. Still, 166 Idaho 351, 458 P.3d 220 (App. 2019), is overruled. State v. Karst, 2022 Ida. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on ID: Calling for drug dog before RS existed extended the stop

M.D.Ala.: Information from seller’s GPS tracker on used car didn’t require a SW

Tracking a used car by its GPS for repossession didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Defendant bought a used car apparently to use in a robbery. A license plate reader identified the car and the police easily tracked it back to … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Information from seller’s GPS tracker on used car didn’t require a SW

W.D.N.C.: § 1983 claim officers dented a door during a raid is not a 4A violation

Claim officers denting a door during a raid is not a Fourth Amendment violation. Fulbright v. Hodges, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85727 (W.D.N.C. May 12, 2022):

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: § 1983 claim officers dented a door during a raid is not a 4A violation

CA2: County order to surrender firearms on losing pistol permit wasn’t a “seizure” of his effects

Plaintiff had his pistol permit revoked under New York law. The County’s requirement he surrender his long guns when that happens is not unreasonable. The court questions whether it’s even a “seizure” of his effects under the Fourth Amendment. (He … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA2: County order to surrender firearms on losing pistol permit wasn’t a “seizure” of his effects

TX13: Stop was consensual but became unreasonable

“We therefore conclude that, although appellant’s encounter with police may have been consensual initially, it advanced into a ‘seizure’ for Fourth Amendment purposes before appellant made any incriminating statements. Because there was no warrant, reasonable suspicion, or probable cause to … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX13: Stop was consensual but became unreasonable

DE: A reporter gets access to SW materials for Apple and social media companies in this murder case

In this two defendant murder case, the state obtained 18 search warrants for Apple and social media, but only one has been returned. A reporter sought access to the affidavits, and it’s granted. Defense counsel has already been given access … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: A reporter gets access to SW materials for Apple and social media companies in this murder case

W.D.Va.: Knock-and-announce isn’t required when no one home

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging execution of the search warrant without knocking and announcing. First, the homeowner wasn’t there; he was in the hospital. Second, Hudson doesn’t permit that challenge under the exclusionary rule. Brown v. Clarke, 2022 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Knock and announce, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Knock-and-announce isn’t required when no one home

IA: Admission of SW affidavit at trial with CI’s version violated confrontation

Admission of the search warrant affidavit here at trial with inadmissible hearsay of the CI was a violation of confrontation. State v. Martinez, 2022 Iowa App. LEXIS 410 (May 11, 2022). These search warrant materials remain sealed for one year. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on IA: Admission of SW affidavit at trial with CI’s version violated confrontation