Monthly Archives: June 2022

CA3: Not plain error to fail to exclude potential prejudicial testimony about risk of violence in execution of SW

Testimony about how a search warrant was executed as it was could have prejudiced defendant by revealing the government thought he was violent before arrest. It was not, however, plain error on this record without an objection. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA3: Not plain error to fail to exclude potential prejudicial testimony about risk of violence in execution of SW

CA2: FAA information about movements of airplane gave DEA RS for stop on tarmac

The FAA’s information about the movements of defendant’s single engine airplane gave the DEA reasonable suspicion to stop it on the tarmac. Then officers developed probable cause. United States v. Bodnar, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 17035 (2d Cir. June 21, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: FAA information about movements of airplane gave DEA RS for stop on tarmac

CA5: Def’s actions showed he consented to entry into house

The evidence supports the district court’s conclusion defendant consented to the second entry of his home. His actions and turning to lead officers into his house showed consent. United States v. Lozano, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 16894 (5th Cir. June … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: Def’s actions showed he consented to entry into house

D.Conn.: Handcuffing did not turn this stop into an arrest

Handcuffing did not turn this stop into an arrest. United States v. Walker, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108170 (D.Conn. June 17, 2022).* Petitioner’s 2254 claim was based on ineffective assistance of counsel for waiver of his claim that he was … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Handcuffing did not turn this stop into an arrest

D.Ariz.: PC so lacking, “this is a no-brainer”

“The Court finds that the search warrant affidavit comes nowhere near to establishing probable cause for the search of the cell phone. Simply put, this is a no-brainer. In fact, the government’s conclusory argument noted above demonstrates the futility of … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: PC so lacking, “this is a no-brainer”

KY: REP in CSLI

There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s CSLI. One can have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her movements on public roads. Commonwealth v. Reed, 2022 Ky. LEXIS 132 (June 16, 2022):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on KY: REP in CSLI

CA6: A police order to come out of one’s house is a seizure

“These cases clearly establish that forced compliance with orders is a Fourth Amendment seizure. Mendenhall and Saari establish that words that compel compliance with the officer’s orders to exit a house constitute a seizure. Thus, when taking the facts in … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: A police order to come out of one’s house is a seizure

NY3: SW two months after shooting was not stale where police were still investigating

The victim was shot in July 2016. In August, the police got a search warrant for his place and found nothing connecting him to it. In September, they got a second search warrant for a second place and found guns, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on NY3: SW two months after shooting was not stale where police were still investigating

WY: State failed to show implied consent to enter home

A sheriff’s deputy showed up at defendant’s house to talk to her. He encountered her husband outside. The husband went in to get his wife, and the officer followed into the mudroom. There was no implied consent for the officer … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WY: State failed to show implied consent to enter home

CA8: Shove was not a seizure

A mere shove was not a Fourth Amendment seizure nor excessive force. Martinez v. Sasse, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 16624 (8th Cir. June 16, 2022):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Shove was not a seizure

WI: Search incident for shoplifting permitted search of small canister on keychain

Defendant was arrested for shoplifting, and, on her arrest, a search incident of a small canister attached to her keychain was reasonable, despite it being so small no evidence of theft would be there. State v. Meisenhelder, 2022 Wisc. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on WI: Search incident for shoplifting permitted search of small canister on keychain

WI: On remand in Mitchell v. Wisconsin blood draw reasonable

On remand from Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 139 S. Ct. 2525, 2539 (2019), defendant’s blood draw was reasonable. State v. Mitchell, 2022 Wisc. App. LEXIS 518 (June 15, 2022): When the Mitchell Court remanded this case, it did so for a … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on WI: On remand in Mitchell v. Wisconsin blood draw reasonable

IA: Failure to articulate why state const. applies for different result is waiver

Failure to articulate one’s argument that the state constitution requires a different result is waiver. State v. Versteegh, 2022 Iowa App. LEXIS 434 (June 15, 2022). “Here, the issuing judge reasonably concluded, based on all of the circumstances, that there … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on IA: Failure to articulate why state const. applies for different result is waiver

E.D.Tex.: Whether RV was immobile and used as a residence doesn’t matter where GFE applies

“In his third numbered objection, Lee argues that contrary to Officer Kennedy’s testimony, the RV was completely immobile at the time it was searched and that it was being used as a residence. But whether the RV was mobile or … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Whether RV was immobile and used as a residence doesn’t matter where GFE applies

50th Anniversary of the Watergate break-in

50 years ago early this morning, the Watergate break-in occurred. And the rest is history. I was in the summer recess between being a 2L and 3L, probably already in summer classes. I studied for the bar exam to be … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on 50th Anniversary of the Watergate break-in

Volokh Conspiracy: Qualifying Qualified Immunity: The Cases in Which the Fair Notice Rationale Clearly Supports …

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: Qualifying Qualified Immunity: The Cases in Which the Fair Notice Rationale Clearly Supports … (“and clearly does not support qualified immunity.”) by Nathan Chapman

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: Qualifying Qualified Immunity: The Cases in Which the Fair Notice Rationale Clearly Supports …

ATL: Federal Judge Just Doesn’t Feel Like Reading The Fifth Circuit’s Cases

And here, the defendant won on the search issue: ATL: Federal Judge Just Doesn’t Feel Like Reading The Fifth Circuit’s Cases by Kathryn Rubino (“Is this the most relatable a federal judge has ever been?”) discussing United States v. McKinney, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ATL: Federal Judge Just Doesn’t Feel Like Reading The Fifth Circuit’s Cases

CA9: Failure to deliver SW at scene of search violated Rule 41, but no suppression here

Failure to deliver the whole search warrant to defendant violated Rule 41(f)(1)(C), but it wasn’t deliberate so no suppression. United States v. Manaku, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 16337 (9th Cir. June 14, 2022). 2254 petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel for … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Ineffective assistance, Seizure, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA9: Failure to deliver SW at scene of search violated Rule 41, but no suppression here

NY Richmond Co.: PC without including protective sweep

“These facts alone, without taking the protective sweep into consideration, would have provided a magistrate with probable cause to issue a search warrant. A sworn statement of an identified member of the community attesting to facts directly and personally observed … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Richmond Co.: PC without including protective sweep

OH7: Attached affidavit made SW particular

While the search warrant wasn’t particular, it incorporated the affidavit which was. State v. Bugno, 2022-Ohio-2008, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 1882 (7th Dist. June 9, 2022). The emergency aid exception applies: “[T]he presence of blood on the premises, coupled with … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OH7: Attached affidavit made SW particular