Monthly Archives: October 2019

D.Ariz.: Def had no REP against use of a zooming pole camera across from the front of his house

The DEA set up a pole camera across the street from defendant’s house to watch the comings and goings expecting a car to go to New Mexico with drugs. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what the camera … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Def had no REP against use of a zooming pole camera across from the front of his house

LA4: Nervousness and furtiveness of person clutching bag on Bourbon St during Halloween crowd justified stop to check for weapons

It was Halloween on Bourbon Street, which is the largest crowd in New Orleans other than Mardi Gras. Defendant was stopped for his suspicious behavior on seeing EMS personnel, and he quickened his pace and tucked his bag under his … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on LA4: Nervousness and furtiveness of person clutching bag on Bourbon St during Halloween crowd justified stop to check for weapons

OR: A question to a fidgety driver about weapons in the car didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

Defendant was pulled over after passing a parked police car three times, and the officer seeing the tags were expired on the third pass. When defendant was pulled over, he was unusually fidgety. A question about weapons in the car … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: A question to a fidgety driver about weapons in the car didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

CA5: Franks doesn’t neatly apply to § 1983 because the question there is just probable cause

Plaintiff was arrested for capital murder based on an affidavit for arrest that omitted serious doubts about the eyewitness’s identification. Later, the charge was dropped, and plaintiff sued the affiant for a “civil Franks violation.” Franks doesn’t neatly apply in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA5: Franks doesn’t neatly apply to § 1983 because the question there is just probable cause

OR: Order to produce passcode to an iPhone seeks testimonial evidence

Defendant was held in contempt for not providing the passcode to access his cell phone. The court of appeals affirms. Entering a passcode into a smartphone is testimonial in nature. The Fifth Amendment’s foregone conclusion doctrine as to knowledge of … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on OR: Order to produce passcode to an iPhone seeks testimonial evidence

OH5: Staleness argument fails as to ongoing MJ grow operation

Information about a marijuana grow operation was ongoing by its nature, so staleness is more flexible as to it and information can be older. Also, the good faith exception would apply. State v. Laubacher, 2019-Ohio-4271, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4343 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Staleness argument fails as to ongoing MJ grow operation

TX10: The search and seizure issue in the trial court needs to be the same as the one presented on appeal or it’s waived

The search and seizure issue in the trial court needs to be the same as the one presented on appeal or it’s waived. “Villareal’s complaint on appeal that the trial court erred in denying Villareal’s motion to suppress as to … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on TX10: The search and seizure issue in the trial court needs to be the same as the one presented on appeal or it’s waived

IL: Merely radioing for a drug dog did not materially extend a stop that was only 3 minutes long

This case is on post-conviction, and defendant attached a police report to his petition. Based on the police report, the mere act of radioing for a drug dog did not appreciably extend the stop which took three minutes. People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Merely radioing for a drug dog did not materially extend a stop that was only 3 minutes long

CA6: Codef’s appeal from same suppression hearing already affirmed, so that’s law of the case [even though he didn’t get to brief it, so how fair is that?]

The codefendant’s appeal on the same grounds, from the same suppression hearing was affirmed in July. That’s law of the case as to this defendant. United States v. Thompson, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 30910 (6th Cir. Oct. 16, 2019). “Carter … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA6: Codef’s appeal from same suppression hearing already affirmed, so that’s law of the case [even though he didn’t get to brief it, so how fair is that?]

OH: On LPN check, car not matching color on registration is enough for a stop to see if it’s stolen

“When an officer encounters a vehicle the whole of which is painted a different color from the color listed in the vehicle-registration records and the officer believes, based on his experience, that the vehicle or its displayed license plates may … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH: On LPN check, car not matching color on registration is enough for a stop to see if it’s stolen

Just Security: A Fourth Amendment Framework for Voiceprint Database Searches

Just Security: A Fourth Amendment Framework for Voiceprint Database Searches by Cassandra Deskus & Joshua R. Fattal:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Just Security: A Fourth Amendment Framework for Voiceprint Database Searches

CA11: PC or not, the warrantless entry to arrest ptf violated the 4A

The parties got into an argument, and plaintiff went back into his house. The defendant came in after him. “Without deciding whether Bailey’s arrest was supported by probable cause—or, as it goes in the qualified-immunity context, ‘arguable probable cause’—we reverse. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: PC or not, the warrantless entry to arrest ptf violated the 4A

N.D.W.Va.: One officer can swear to an affidavit prepared by another under the 4A

The fact one officer swore to an affidavit prepared by another on the other’s knowledge is not a constitutional violation. Moreover, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Parrish, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178155 (N.D. W.Va. Oct. 15, 2019). … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: One officer can swear to an affidavit prepared by another under the 4A

WA: Breath for BAC is not subject to search incident doctrine

Defendant was arrested for another reason, and police did a search incident of his breath for DUI. That’s not a proper purpose. City of Vancouver v. Kaufman, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 2616 (Oct. 15, 2019). The search warrant appears based … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Drug or alcohol testing, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: Breath for BAC is not subject to search incident doctrine

Philadelphia Inquirer: As Philadelphia aims to curb racial disparities, why are police stops of black drivers skyrocketing?

Philadelphia Inquirer: As Philadelphia aims to curb racial disparities, why are police stops of black drivers skyrocketing? by Samantha Melamed (“Although Philadelphia police and civil rights lawyers have been monitoring pedestrian stops and frisks since 2011 — when they entered … Continue reading

Posted in Racial profiling | Comments Off on Philadelphia Inquirer: As Philadelphia aims to curb racial disparities, why are police stops of black drivers skyrocketing?

WaPo: Her tampon was pulled out in public by a police officer looking for drugs. Now, she could get $205,000.

WaPo: Her tampon was pulled out in public by a police officer looking for drugs. Now, she could get $205,000. By Allyson Chiu:

Posted in Body searches | Comments Off on WaPo: Her tampon was pulled out in public by a police officer looking for drugs. Now, she could get $205,000.

Just Security: The FISA Court’s Section 702 Opinions, Part II: Improper Queries and Echoes of “Bulk Collection”

Just Security: The FISA Court’s Section 702 Opinions, Part II: Improper Queries and Echoes of “Bulk Collection” by Elizabeth Goitein:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on Just Security: The FISA Court’s Section 702 Opinions, Part II: Improper Queries and Echoes of “Bulk Collection”

NYTimes: Opinion: You’re in a Police Lineup, Right Now

NYTimes: Opinion: You’re in a Police Lineup, Right Now (“Face-recognition technology is the new norm. You may think, ‘I’ve got nothing to hide,’ but we all should be concerned.”).

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Opinion: You’re in a Police Lineup, Right Now

CA7: Airbnb tenant who was theft victim can consent to police entry to rental unit

Plaintiff’s Airbnb tenant suffered a theft, and he had the authority to consent to an entry by police to investigate it. Wonsey v. City of Chicago, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 30651 (7th Cir. Oct. 15, 2019).* The officer didn’t prolong … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Airbnb tenant who was theft victim can consent to police entry to rental unit

NC: CSLI violation was attenuated because it only helped locate him and then there was a SW in another state

Defendant’s offense was in 2005 and he was originally tried in 2011 and reversed that conviction. On retrial, he filed a motion to suppress a pen register used to locate him in Colorado. CSLI without a warrant was permitted in … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NC: CSLI violation was attenuated because it only helped locate him and then there was a SW in another state