Daily Archives: October 11, 2019

E.D.Pa.: Protective sweep was properly limited and cell phones in plain view could be seized if it was readily apparent they were evidence

The officers’ protective sweep was justified by the facts, and it was constrained to areas large enough to hide a person. In plain view were two cell phones that were properly seized and then later searched with a warrant. United … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Protective sweep was properly limited and cell phones in plain view could be seized if it was readily apparent they were evidence

S.D.Ga.: It was reasonable to stop defendant and inquire where def was parked next to a dilapidated building

Defendant’s stop for parking near a dilapidated maybe abandoned structure was reasonable because the officers were justified in inquiring who he was and what he was doing. In their experience, this activity supported at least an inference that defendant might … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: It was reasonable to stop defendant and inquire where def was parked next to a dilapidated building

N.D.Iowa: SW said “immediate search” but officers waited two days; not a 4A violation

The search warrant said that is should be executed “immediately,” but officers waited two days to coordinate with the multiple agencies involved. Rule 41(e) says “execute the warrant within a specified time no longer than 14 days.” At worse, this … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: SW said “immediate search” but officers waited two days; not a 4A violation