Daily Archives: October 1, 2019

D.Nev.: Govt’s stated intent to forfeit requires motion for return of property be denied

Motion for return of property seized five weeks ago is denied. The government will image electronics and return them. That which is subject to forfeiture has to await it. United States v. Wells, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168017 (D. Nev. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Govt’s stated intent to forfeit requires motion for return of property be denied

D.Conn.: Def counsel’s memo to his own file regarding why 4A claim wasn’t further pursued was admissible in 2255 to show strategic basis

Defense counsel’s memo to his own file about his choice not to further pursue a GPS tracking issue that was fully litigated in a hearing was admissible in the 2255 to show the reasonable strategic basis for the decision. Corbett … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Def counsel’s memo to his own file regarding why 4A claim wasn’t further pursued was admissible in 2255 to show strategic basis

E.D.La.: Alleged mistreatment during SW execution doesn’t overcome overwhelming facts of guilt

Defendant’s alleged mistreatment during the execution of the search warrant, which was only vaguely described in the opinion, even if provable, wouldn’t overcome the overwhelming proof of guilt. Here it was raised as an IAC claim. United States v. Puente, … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Alleged mistreatment during SW execution doesn’t overcome overwhelming facts of guilt

W.D.Pa.: 4A doesn’t require closer questioning of one claiming a serious emergency that proved to be false

Officers responded to a 911 call that six shotgun toting men broke into a house. They talked to the caller at the scene. The front door was open. They knocked and announced and entered. Doing a protective sweep of the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: 4A doesn’t require closer questioning of one claiming a serious emergency that proved to be false

CA2 applies GFE even though not litigated below because the findings on PC show it

A second search warrant was issued for defendant’s cell phone. He argued lack of probable cause and the government responded. The government didn’t raise the good faith exception in the district court. The court assumes lack of probable cause and … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA2 applies GFE even though not litigated below because the findings on PC show it

E.D.Mo.: 4A IAC claim denied for not specifying what it would prove and because waived by plea

“Petitioner’s Claim 9 is likewise conclusory and without merit. Petitioner claims that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate a potential Fourth Amendment violation regarding Petitioner’s consent to search his residence and computer. However, Petitioner has not explained how such … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: 4A IAC claim denied for not specifying what it would prove and because waived by plea

ABC News: After police shot the wrong man, city’s lawyer argues man didn’t have constitutional rights because he was undocumented

ABC News: After police shot the wrong man, city’s lawyer argues man didn’t have constitutional rights because he was undocumented by Meghan Kenally. Except undocumented people have Fourth Amendment rights. I.N.S. v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 (1984).

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on ABC News: After police shot the wrong man, city’s lawyer argues man didn’t have constitutional rights because he was undocumented