Daily Archives: October 29, 2019

N.D.Ohio & S.D.Miss.: SW including “any vehicle on the premises” is still particular

A search warrant that authorized the search of “any vehicle on the premises” was not unparticular because it allowed searches of visitor’s cars too. Plenty of cases already hold that “any vehicle on the premises” is particular. Moreover, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio & S.D.Miss.: SW including “any vehicle on the premises” is still particular

CA2: Not clearly established for QI that a warrantless body cavity search required exigency and a particularized suspicion

A police officer was entitled to qualified immunity because the right to be free from a warrantless manual body cavity search in the absence of exigent circumstances and a particularized suspicion that evidence of a crime was secreted inside the … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Not clearly established for QI that a warrantless body cavity search required exigency and a particularized suspicion

OH5: It was reasonable to run the dog around a car in a traffic stop where it happened without extending the stop during waiting time

The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress where the officer ran the dog around the car within the time of the normal traffic stop. Therefore, the traffic stop was not illegally extended because the purpose … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH5: It was reasonable to run the dog around a car in a traffic stop where it happened without extending the stop during waiting time

WaPo: Feds to experiment with allowing police officers to wear body cameras on task forces

WaPo: Feds to experiment with allowing police officers to wear body cameras on task forces (“Police chiefs wanted cameras, but no federal agencies wear them. A pilot program will allow cameras during operations in some cities.”)

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on WaPo: Feds to experiment with allowing police officers to wear body cameras on task forces

IN: SW obtained off of lost drone video wasn’t stale when it was only about four days

A lady found a drone in her yard, and she was already concerned about people flying drones over her house. A computer memory card was in the drone. She looked at it, and called the police and turned it over. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Staleness | Comments Off on IN: SW obtained off of lost drone video wasn’t stale when it was only about four days

CA9: Even if there was a Miranda violation, SW still valid

“Because no Miranda violation occurred, the police permissibly relied on Terui’s incriminating statements in obtaining the search warrant for his home. Even if a Miranda violation had occurred, however, suppression of the evidence found pursuant to the warrant would not … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA9: Even if there was a Miranda violation, SW still valid

CA4: The officer knew def had a gun before def’s alleged involuntary confession

The government proved inevitable discovery. “The record makes clear that before Alston made any involuntary admissions, Captain Aleem believed that Alston possessed a gun, had the probable cause necessary to search the car, and intended to find the gun. The … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA4: The officer knew def had a gun before def’s alleged involuntary confession

CO: DHS caseworkers subject to 4A in their warrantless entry

State DHS case workers are subject to the Fourth Amendment, and their warrantless entry into defendant’s home was unreasonable. People v. Dyer, 2019 COA 161, 2019 Colo. App. LEXIS 1588 (Oct. 24, 2019). Probable cause for search of a car … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on CO: DHS caseworkers subject to 4A in their warrantless entry

W.D.Va.: Arrest warrant didn’t have to be in hand at time of arrest

When defendant was arrested on an arrest warrant, it was constitutionally required that officers have the warrant in hand at the time of the arrest. Rule 4 only requires the warrant be shown as soon as practical. Defendant was arrested … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Arrest warrant didn’t have to be in hand at time of arrest

IA: Failure to get ruling on state constitutional claim was waiver

Defendant barely raised the state constitutional claim below and why it should be different than the Fourth Amendment claim and in her briefing, but the issue was not decided below so it wasn’t preserved for review. State v. Lasley-Eakins, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: Failure to get ruling on state constitutional claim was waiver