Monthly Archives: June 2016

EFF: Racial Bias and Arrest Tech

EFF: Racial Bias and Arrest Tech by Jennifer Lynch and Adam Schwartz: Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court took away a little more of your right to be free from unlawful police searches. In a 5-3 decision in Utah v. … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on EFF: Racial Bias and Arrest Tech

S.D.Tex.: Seizure of cell phone incident to arrest was valid

“Here, the seizure of Fulton’s cell phone during his arrest fell squarely within the exception articulated in Chimel and Robinson as a seizure incident to arrest.” United States v. Fulton, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83014 (S.D.Tex. June 23, 2016). The … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Seizure of cell phone incident to arrest was valid

Baltimore Sun: Baltimore Police institute new ‘use of force’ policy for officers as Justice Department report looms

Baltimore Sun: Baltimore Police institute new ‘use of force’ policy for officers as Justice Department report looms by Kevin Rector: The Baltimore Police Department plans to implement a new use-of-force policy Friday that emphasizes the “sanctity of life,” stresses de-escalation … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Baltimore Sun: Baltimore Police institute new ‘use of force’ policy for officers as Justice Department report looms

D.Minn.: USDJ’s job is to adopt R&R when the proof is in dispute

When there are two views of the suppression evidence before the USMJ that are plausible, it’s not the USDJ’s job to reject the R&R but adopt it. United States v. Hull, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83877 (D.Minn. June 27, 2016)*:

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on D.Minn.: USDJ’s job is to adopt R&R when the proof is in dispute

Outside the Beltway: The Fourth Amendment Was Meant To Protect All Of Us, Not Just The “Innocent”

Outside the Beltway: The Fourth Amendment Was Meant To Protect All Of Us, Not Just The “Innocent” by Doug Mataconis: . . . Right off the bat, I must note with all due respect that the assertion that the protections … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Outside the Beltway: The Fourth Amendment Was Meant To Protect All Of Us, Not Just The “Innocent”

Cal.4th: sex offense probation condition that def submit to computer searches was reasonable

Defendant’s sex offense probation condition that he submit to computer searches was reasonably related to the offense. In re George F., 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 518 (4th Dist. June 28, 2016):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Cal.4th: sex offense probation condition that def submit to computer searches was reasonable

CA6: Nexus isn’t shown to def’s house just because his car is registered there

The search warrant for defendant’s house was not based on any nexus between his alleged offense and his house. His car was involved in drug dealing, but his car being registered at his house isn’t nexus to the house. United … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Nexus isn’t shown to def’s house just because his car is registered there

E.D.La.: Shipping a package under an alias means no REP in it to challenge search

Defendant shipped a package from a UPS store in San Bernardino CA to Houma LA. His name wasn’t on the package as the sender or the recipient, so he didn’t have standing to challenge the search of the package. United … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Shipping a package under an alias means no REP in it to challenge search

CA8: Affidavit only referred to CI as “reliable,” and the affiant could have said more but didn’t; PC on totality

The affidavit for a GPS warrant only referred to the CI as “reliable,” and the affiant could have said more but didn’t. Still, the officer did do things to try to corroborate without elaborating. On the totality, probable cause was … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA8: Affidavit only referred to CI as “reliable,” and the affiant could have said more but didn’t; PC on totality

CA9: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases, joining other circuits. Lingo v. City of Salem, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11708 (9th Cir. June 27, 2016) (amended Aug. 8, 2016):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA9: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

Verdict: A Potential Landmine in Waiting in Utah v. Strieff

Verdict: A Potential Landmine in Waiting in Utah v. Strieff by Sherry F. Colb:

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Verdict: A Potential Landmine in Waiting in Utah v. Strieff

ID: Shoplifting stop didn’t justify a frisk

Defendant was stopped out in the parking lot of a store as an alleged accessory to shoplifting. The stop was with reasonable suspicion, but the frisk for weapons was not. Heroin was found in his pocket, and it is suppressed. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on ID: Shoplifting stop didn’t justify a frisk

CA5: Roving Border Patrol stop satisfied Brignoni-Ponce standard

“In determining reasonable suspicion in the context of roving Border Patrol stops, courts examine the totality of the circumstances, including the factors enunciated in Brignoni-Ponce. … These are (1) the area’s proximity to the border; (2) the characteristics of the … Continue reading

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on CA5: Roving Border Patrol stop satisfied Brignoni-Ponce standard

HI: Four flyovers of def’s house violated curtilage and REP under state constitution

Four police flyovers of defendant’s house, one at 420′, was not a search under the Fourth Amendment, but it was unreasonable under the Hawai’i Constitution. 20-25 marijuana plants were seen in the flyover. Driving by the residence, however, no plants … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Open fields, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on HI: Four flyovers of def’s house violated curtilage and REP under state constitution

N.D.Ill.: Def not credible where he contradicted under oath at suppression hearing his Pretrial Services interview on drug use

Defendant’s credibility at the suppression hearing was blown by his contradictory statements to Pretrial Services about his drug use. He directly contradicted under oath what he told them. Therefore, the court believes the government’s version of events. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Def not credible where he contradicted under oath at suppression hearing his Pretrial Services interview on drug use

OH11: Officer’s failure to mention consent in his reports undermined his credibility at the suppression hearing

Police came to defendant’s girlfriend’s house to arrest him, and she allegedly let them in to look but they found methamphetamine too. No consent was mentioned in the police report, and she denied it. The trial court found no consent, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent | Comments Off on OH11: Officer’s failure to mention consent in his reports undermined his credibility at the suppression hearing

IA: School officials had RS to search football player’s equipment bag on hearing metal clunk

Defendant was a high school football player injured during a game, and he went to the hospital. He was expressly concerned about the contents of his school-issued equipment bag to the point that school officials nearly had reasonable suspicion. When … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on IA: School officials had RS to search football player’s equipment bag on hearing metal clunk

AK: Protective sweep could precede probation search

The challenged part of the home search here was a protective sweep before a probation search, and it was reasonable. Elisoff v. State, 2016 Alas. App. LEXIS 118 (June 22, 2016) (mem.).* 2255 petitioner’s claim that his defense counsel was … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Protective sweep could precede probation search

OR: Telling def he had to stay with the car while the drug dog came was based on reasonable suspicion

Quick entry and exit of a house under surveillance for drug sales led to police following defendant’s car. Furtive movements occurred inside, and defendant delayed stopping the car until those movements stopped. All that was reasonable suspicion to detain for … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Telling def he had to stay with the car while the drug dog came was based on reasonable suspicion

NYTimes: Mark Zuckerberg Covers His Laptop Camera. You Should Consider It, Too.

NYTimes: Mark Zuckerberg Covers His Laptop Camera. You Should Consider It, Too. by Katie Rogers:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: Mark Zuckerberg Covers His Laptop Camera. You Should Consider It, Too.