Category Archives: Excessive force

D.Me.: Settled law at the time means exclusionary rule not applied, even if the law was later changing

Officers relied on settled law in this circuit that the search incident was valid. Maybe it wouldn’t be later, but it was at the time. The exclusionary rule should not be applied under Davis. “Given the similarity of these two … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Me.: Settled law at the time means exclusionary rule not applied, even if the law was later changing

E.D.Ark.: City’s court order made clean up and removal of ptf’s property reasonable

Plaintiff was told for years to clean up his property from unsightly construction materials and equipment. After many failed efforts to get him to do so, the city obtained a court order to remove the property. It removed nine trailerloads … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: City’s court order made clean up and removal of ptf’s property reasonable

CA6: All family members have common authority over common areas of the house

All family members have common authority over common areas of the house. United States v. Campany, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 9518 (6th Cir. Apr. 8, 2022). Defendant’s Franks claim for ineffective assistance of counsel fails for failing to show what … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: All family members have common authority over common areas of the house

CA9: PC of digital theft from Microsoft by employee also led to his home computer

There was probable cause to believe that defendant’s home computer would have evidence of his $10m digital theft from Microsoft from when he worked there. United States v. Kvashuk, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8275 (9th Cir. Mar. 28, 2022).* There … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on CA9: PC of digital theft from Microsoft by employee also led to his home computer

CA3: “[R]easonableness [of force] under the Fourth Amendment should frequently remain a question for the jury”

“Given the totality of the circumstances, the District Court erred in concluding as a matter of law that the use of force was objectively reasonable. See Giles v. Kearney, 571 F.3d 318, 327 n.4 (3d Cir. 2009) (denying summary judgment … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: “[R]easonableness [of force] under the Fourth Amendment should frequently remain a question for the jury”

PA: No apparent authority that def’s mother, a visitor outside, could consent to search

There was no apparent authority for defendant’s mother to consent to police entry. They knew she was a mere visitor herself, and she offered to let them in. She was not inside; she just came up when they were there. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force | Comments Off on PA: No apparent authority that def’s mother, a visitor outside, could consent to search

A few § 1983 cases on QI and summary judgment

Ordering plaintiff out of the Sheriff’s Office lobby for fear of disruption was novel as a potential seizure and that’s subject to qualified immunity. “Sheriff Crone’s conduct in ordering Mr. Brandt to leave the lobby due to a perceived disruption … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on A few § 1983 cases on QI and summary judgment

HI: Announcement not required for SW execution on open tent

Officers had a search warrant for a tent in a homeless encampment. Announcement before entry wasn’t required where the tent was not shut. State v. Keanaaina, 2022 Haw. LEXIS 44 (Mar. 22, 2022). Officers encountered defendant’s car double parked on … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on HI: Announcement not required for SW execution on open tent

Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver

Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver (“Jury finds First, Fourth amendment violations of protesters by police”)

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Denver7: Federal jury awards $14 million to protesters injured in 2020 demonstrations in Denver

CA9: Two on QI: pepper spraying and Tasering

Officer denied qualified immunity for pepper-spraying a non-violent protester in the face. “In sum, every reasonable officer had notice at the time of the incident that, if reasonable alternatives are available, even in somewhat chaotic circumstances, he or she cannot … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Two on QI: pepper spraying and Tasering

D.Mass.: Pretrial inmate mail was subject to search even though inmate handbook didn’t discuss it

While the pretrial inmate handbook didn’t say that outgoing mail was subject to inspection, the Supreme Court held in Stroud in 1919 that such searches were reasonable. And this one was too. United States v. Polanco, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Excessive force, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Pretrial inmate mail was subject to search even though inmate handbook didn’t discuss it

FL4: Suspicionless probation search condition violates state law

The probation search condition permitting one without reasonable suspicion violates state law. Remanded to strike it from probation terms. Bowman v. State, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 1611 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 9, 2022). Window tinting stop: “Moreover, because Trooper Otterson … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Pretext, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on FL4: Suspicionless probation search condition violates state law

CA6: Personal check with residence address used in scheme was nexus to home

The 70 page search warrant affidavit in a bribery and kickback scheme showed probable cause for defendant’s residence. Records already seen showed a personal check on the home address was involved. He also was alleged to have diverted patients to … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Personal check with residence address used in scheme was nexus to home

CA6: With multiple uses of excessive force, each must be analyzed

“Where ‘a plaintiff claims that excessive force was used multiple times, “the court must segment the incident into its constituent parts and consider the officer’s entitlement to qualified immunity at each step along the way.”’ Wright, 962 F.3d at 865 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA6: With multiple uses of excessive force, each must be analyzed

CA9: The “shocking the conscience” standard is higher than the 4A standard for use of force

The “shocking the conscience” standard is way higher than the Fourth Amendment standard in excessive force cases. “The plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment claim requires that the officers’ conduct ‘shocks the conscience’—a standard that is more demanding of the plaintiffs than the … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: The “shocking the conscience” standard is higher than the 4A standard for use of force

NYLJ: Analysis: How Courts Determine the Constitutionality of Police Use of Deadly Force

NYLJ: Analysis: How Courts Determine the Constitutionality of Police Use of Deadly Force (“In determining ‘objective reasonableness’ in police use of deadly force cases, Martin Schwartz looks at the Tenth Circuit’s recent decision in’ Estate of Taylor v. Salt Lake … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on NYLJ: Analysis: How Courts Determine the Constitutionality of Police Use of Deadly Force

S.D.Ill.: CPS seizing child from home can be a 4A claim

A governmental actor taking a child from the home is determined under the Fourth Amendment if substantive due process does not apply. Brokaw v. Mercer County, 235 F.3d 1000, 1017-18 (7th Cir. 2000). H.P. v. Kelley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: CPS seizing child from home can be a 4A claim

CA9: Civil 4A case requires showing of standing, too

Plaintiff’s failure to specify his standing for an alleged Fourth Amendment violation defeats his civil claim. Sanghvi v. County of San Bernardino, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 4335 (9th Cir. Feb. 17, 2022).* “Given the findings of fact at issue here, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: Civil 4A case requires showing of standing, too

FL4: Prosr’s argument def refused to give password to phone violated 4A

“The trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion in limine and allowing the State to present evidence and argument referencing Appellant’s refusal to provide his cellphone PIN and his refusal to consent to a warrantless search of his entire cellphone. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Privileges, Staleness | Comments Off on FL4: Prosr’s argument def refused to give password to phone violated 4A

CA11: Not clearly established warning required before use of deadly force

It was not well established that police need to warn armed people before shooting them. Here, the shooting victim was an innocent homeowner who had a gun on him around his own house investigating a prowler, and the police saw … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Not clearly established warning required before use of deadly force