Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA10: PC isn’t viewed in hindsight; officers had qualified immunity for believing car contained marijuana, even though it didn’t

Plaintiff sued two Wyoming state troopers for a search of his car because they thought they could smell marijuana with a masking smell. After patting plaintiff and his passenger down, the car was searched, and nothing was found. The case … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: PC isn’t viewed in hindsight; officers had qualified immunity for believing car contained marijuana, even though it didn’t

CA6: Violation of some regulations may be “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation

There was probable cause for this § 1983 plaintiff’s arrest. While there may have been some violations of police regulations in how the controlled buy went down, a little “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation. Womack … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Violation of some regulations may be “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation

In OR, driver arrested for suspended DL can hand off purse to passenger without search

When defendant was stopped and arrested for driving on a suspended DL, she refused consent to search her purse and wanted it given to the passenger for safekeeping. The police should have honored that request. The search of the purse … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on In OR, driver arrested for suspended DL can hand off purse to passenger without search

CA3: Pointing a gun at a two unarmed men was objectively reasonable

Pointing a gun at a two unarmed men was objectively reasonable for § 1983 purposes. There was reasonable suspicion for a stop and the officer felt threatened until he knew all that was going on. Stiegel v. Peters Twp., 2014 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Pointing a gun at a two unarmed men was objectively reasonable

CA8: Including false information and excluding important exculpatory information in an affidavit for arrest denies the officer qualified immunity

Including false information and excluding important exculpatory information in an affidavit for arrest denies the officer qualified immunity. Williams v. City of Alexander, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23023 (8th Cir. December 8, 2014), summary from the court: A reasonable jury … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Including false information and excluding important exculpatory information in an affidavit for arrest denies the officer qualified immunity

CA11: SW was not bare bones and a reasonable officer could rely on it; therefore, qualified immunity

A search warrant issued for plaintiffs’ place based on a “13 year” drug investigation that led to trace evidence of drug usage in the basement. The charges filed were ultimately dismissed. The officers were qualifiedly immune because of the issuance … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: SW was not bare bones and a reasonable officer could rely on it; therefore, qualified immunity

LA2: State loses a cocaine search issue, apparently by not arguing all alternative grounds

A car was pulled over and two men fled from it. A third in the back seat was asleep or passed out, and he was awakened by officers banging on the windows. When he awoke, he refused to show his … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on LA2: State loses a cocaine search issue, apparently by not arguing all alternative grounds

CA4: Delousing jail inmates was reasonable strip search under Florence

Delousing male jail inmates by same sex guards was subject to qualified immunity as to them. As to injunctive relief against the agency, it is premature without further evidence being taken, and it appears reasonable as a strip search under … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA4: Delousing jail inmates was reasonable strip search under Florence

FL4: Missing a school bus doesn’t make student a truant subject to frisk

A pat frisk of a student as an alleged truant who missed a school bus an hour before the start of school was invalid because he wasn’t yet a truant. Even so, what’s the basis for a frisk for truancy. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL4: Missing a school bus doesn’t make student a truant subject to frisk

SCOTUS per curiam decides a not front door knock-and-talk on qualified immunity

Officers didn’t go to the front door for a knock-and-announce and they didn’t anybody. The law was not clearly established at the time. The homeowner sued under § 1983. SCOTUS per curiam grants the officers qualified immunity without full briefing. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS per curiam decides a not front door knock-and-talk on qualified immunity

CA3: Where search was limited, alleged overbreadth of SW was less important

The affidavit for the search warrant showed probable cause, so the search can’t be suppressed. Moreover, the officer acted reasonably and gets qualified immunity. The search itself wasn’t as broad as the warrant was argued to allow, so the search … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: Where search was limited, alleged overbreadth of SW was less important

CA2: Entry into curtilage and shooting family dog in front of child not based on exigency

Officers entered the curtilage without a warrant or exigent circumstances and shot plaintiff’s dog in front of his 12 year old daughter. The verdict for the defendant officers is reversed and remanded for trial because they didn’t show reasons for … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Entry into curtilage and shooting family dog in front of child not based on exigency

CA5: Threatened suicide is exigency

A threatened suicide is an exigent circumstance for an entry, following other circuits. Rice v. Reliastar Life Ins. Co., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 20581 (5th Cir. October 27, 2014): The Rice Plaintiffs argue that the exigent circumstances exception to the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Threatened suicide is exigency

CA9: No qualified immunity to handcuffing ADHD child who wouldn’t leave school grounds

Officers were entitled to qualified immunity with regard to an unconstitutional seizure of a minor child with attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder who was sitting quietly but was unresponsive and refused to leave a school playground, since a reasonable officer would … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Police misconduct, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: No qualified immunity to handcuffing ADHD child who wouldn’t leave school grounds

CA8: Arguable PC means qualified immunity against false arrest

There was arguable probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest, so the officers get qualified immunity. Trevino v. Benton County, Arkansas, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19166 (8th Cir. October 8, 2014).* The police obtained separate search warrants for marijuana and a cell … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Arguable PC means qualified immunity against false arrest

CA11: Arguable PC for arrest gives qualified immunity

Arguable probable cause for a warrantless arrest and then a valid search warrant gives qualified immunity to the officers involved. Ultimately the DA decided not to prosecute the plaintiffs, and it was a close case for prosecution. Roddy v. City … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Arguable PC for arrest gives qualified immunity

CA11: Officer denied qualified immunity for slamming passive arrestee to pavement

“We have repeatedly ruled that a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment, and is denied qualified immunity, if he or she uses gratuitous and excessive force against a suspect who is under control, not resisting, and obeying commands. See, e.g., … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer denied qualified immunity for slamming passive arrestee to pavement

CA11: Courthouse security guard denied qualified immunity for twisting arm of a female lawyer on the phone

Plaintiff in this § 1983 case was a lawyer entering the Fulton County Courthouse. She put her briefcase and purse on the conveyor belt for the x-ray machine, but she set off the metal detector. She was instructed to take … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Courthouse security guard denied qualified immunity for twisting arm of a female lawyer on the phone

CA9: A roving game warden stop not a proper administrative search

“We must decide whether a suspicionless roving automobile stop of commercial fishers made while they drive on a public highway to investigate compliance with Washington fish and game laws constitutes an unreasonable search and seizure within the meaning of the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: A roving game warden stop not a proper administrative search

CA2: Whether to employ a SWAT team entitled to qualified immunity; rest of raid not

The decision to employ a SWAT team is subject to qualified immunity, but the actions that follow here aren’t. The raid here was overkill [my word], and the officers do not get qualified immunity for how it was conducted because … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Whether to employ a SWAT team entitled to qualified immunity; rest of raid not