CA9: No qualified immunity to handcuffing ADHD child who wouldn’t leave school grounds

Officers were entitled to qualified immunity with regard to an unconstitutional seizure of a minor child with attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder who was sitting quietly but was unresponsive and refused to leave a school playground, since a reasonable officer would not have known that taking the child into temporary custody was unreasonable, and therefore unconstitutional. The officers were not, however, entitled to qualified immunity for the use of excessive force in unreasonably placing the child in handcuffs to remove the child from school grounds, since the child was in a secure police vehicle, posed no risk of escape or threat to himself or others, and engaged in no act of resistance the entire time the officers were present. C. B. v. City of Sonora, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19757 (9th Cir. October 15, 2014).

Officers had reasonable suspicion from an apparent hand to hand drug transaction in a known drug area. United States v. Jackson, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19784 (10th Cir. October 16, 2014).*

The delay in the stop here was because it took a while to verify defendant’s identity. In the meantime, the suspicion built until it became reasonable suspicion to continue the stop more. United States v. Perez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147041 (D. Minn. September 19, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Police misconduct, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.