Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

MA: Kicking off shoes when police asked for them showed consent

Kicking off one’s sneakers when police asked for them was consent. Commonwealth v. Rodrigues, 2024 Mass. App. LEXIS 91 (July 11, 2024). This search warrant in a RICO case adequately showed probable cause for defendant’s cell phone. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Kicking off shoes when police asked for them showed consent

KS: Extending stop on a hunch lacked RS

“LaGuardia argues that Officer Opperman lacked reasonable suspicion to extend the stop from a crash report to a DUI investigation. He claims that the officer investigated LaGuardia for DUI only because he abandoned his vehicle after the accident in snowy … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: Extending stop on a hunch lacked RS

MI: The officer’s contact with def alone in a “high crime” area wasn’t RS

The officer here approached defendant in his parked car in an apartment complex parking lot without reasonable suspicion to inquire of what he was doing there. That ultimately led to an assault charge. Summarily reversed and dismissed without argument: There … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: The officer’s contact with def alone in a “high crime” area wasn’t RS

S.D.Ga.: State knock-and-announce statute, if it applies at all, doesn’t confer standing on an alleged guest

Plaintiff said she was an overnight guest at the house searched and thus had standing, except that was never proved. “None of those facts are present here, as there is no record evidence showing that James had personal belongings in … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Exclusionary rule, Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: State knock-and-announce statute, if it applies at all, doesn’t confer standing on an alleged guest

CA5: The fact the officer was in an interstate highway drug interdiction team was unavailing because there was a lawful basis for the stop

“Rocha Nevarez’s argument that the stop was unlawful from the start because the trooper was part of a roving drug interdiction team is unavailing. The state trooper witnessed Rocha Nevarez drift over the fog line on eastbound Interstate 20 on … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: The fact the officer was in an interstate highway drug interdiction team was unavailing because there was a lawful basis for the stop

D.N.M.: Summary judgment for defs denied in Torres v. Madrid on remand

On remand in Torres v. Madrid, 141 S. Ct. 989, 209 L.Ed.2d 190 (Mar. 25, 2021), the defendant’s summary judgment motion is denied. Torres v. Madrid, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117079 (D.N.M. July 2, 2024).* An out-of-state temporary plate where … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Summary judgment for defs denied in Torres v. Madrid on remand

NC: Wife had sufficient common authority over cell phone to consent to seizure and search

Defendant allowed his cell phone to be used by everyone in the family, including his child to watch YouTube videos. His wife had sufficient common authority to consent to a seizure and search. State v. Duran-Rivas, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Wife had sufficient common authority over cell phone to consent to seizure and search

D.N.J.: Car leasing company had no 4A claim to car’s lawful impoundment, despite not knowing for 11 months

Honda leased a car that was impounded and towed from the driver because it was unlicensed. Eleven months later Honda located the car and there were thousands of accumulated fees. Honda sued under § 1983. The initial seizure was valid … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Car leasing company had no 4A claim to car’s lawful impoundment, despite not knowing for 11 months

N.D.Ohio: When a stop is based on a law enforcement database, does reliability have to be shown? Here there was more

When a stop is based on a computerized law enforcement database, whether it has to be corroborated (see Gonzalez v. United States Immigration. & Customs Enf’t, 975 F.3d 788, 819 (9th Cir. 2020)) isn’t decided here because here there was … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: When a stop is based on a law enforcement database, does reliability have to be shown? Here there was more

LA1: Opening car door to check for others after speeding stop was reasonable where windows were overtinted

Defendant was seen at 10 pm on radar going 94 in a 35, and the officer gave chase for over four miles, sometimes clocking defendant at 135. When finally stopped and with defendant in the police car, the officer went … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on LA1: Opening car door to check for others after speeding stop was reasonable where windows were overtinted

D.Ariz.: “The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant”

“‘The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant. The determination of probable cause is based upon a “totality of the circumstances” test, and the government’s evidence must be more than that which … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Forfeiture, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: “The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant”

CT: Pretrial detainees still have no REP in jail calls

There is no constitutional distinction between pretrial detainees and convicts in a jail for the reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone calls on a jail line phone they knew was recorded. State v. Bember, 2024 Conn. LEXIS 153 (June 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CT: Pretrial detainees still have no REP in jail calls

CA3: Getting ptf’s personal information from third parties after he was seen open carrying was not 2A or 4A violation

Plaintiff was seen open carrying on a bicycle, and the officer attempted to stop him. The officer later got information on plaintiff from a store he’d been in. None of that violated the Second or Fourth Amendment. Glover v. Fidaannd, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA3: Getting ptf’s personal information from third parties after he was seen open carrying was not 2A or 4A violation

D.Conn.: Failure to challenge lack of announcement in federal court was futile and not ineffective assistance

“First, Mr. Smith cannot establish prejudice from his attorney failing to raise the alleged violation of the knock-and-announce requirement as ‘the exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence discovered in the ensuing search.’ United States v. Acosta, 502 F.3d 54, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Failure to challenge lack of announcement in federal court was futile and not ineffective assistance

VA: 4A exclusionary rule does not apply in a civil zoning case

The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule does not apply in a civil zoning case. Bd. of Supervisors of Fairfax Cty. v. Leach-Lewis, 2024 Va. LEXIS 38 (June 20, 2024). Surveillance of him at a stash house and other information provided probable … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: 4A exclusionary rule does not apply in a civil zoning case

WI: Community caretaking stop couldn’t be expanded without RS

Where defendant was stopped under the community caretaking function, expanding the stop without further justification was unreasonable. Here, it was because the officer thought defendant may have been driving while sleepy, but the stop was extended. State v. Wiskowski, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Custody, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Community caretaking stop couldn’t be expanded without RS

N.Mar.Isl.: DNA order in probate case complied with 4A

There was sufficient justification for the court to order a DNA test in a probate matter, and the order complied with the Fourth Amendment. In re Est. of Kapileo, 2024 N. Mar. I. LEXIS 4 (Superior Ct. June 18, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.Mar.Isl.: DNA order in probate case complied with 4A

D.P.R.: PR nighttime search rules irrelevant in federal court

Puerto Rico cases on nighttime search aren’t relevant in federal court. United States v. Pastrana-Román, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238527 (D.P.R. March 9, 2023),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106442 (D.P.R. May 17, 2024).* Defendant didn’t show good cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.P.R.: PR nighttime search rules irrelevant in federal court

OH2: Home safe could be searched under probation search waiver

The probation search of defendant’s home safe was reasonable under Knights, Griffin, and state law. State v. Apple, 2024-Ohio-2286, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 2166 (2d Dist. June 14, 2024). There was reasonable suspicion to stop defendant in a car, and … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Home safe could be searched under probation search waiver

ID: Still reasonable to rerun LPN information during stop, having done it earlier in day

Earlier in the day before the traffic stop, the officer had already run defendant’s LPN. It was reasonable to do it again during the stop, and this did not unconstitutionally lengthen the stop. State v. Tranmer, 2024 Ida. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Still reasonable to rerun LPN information during stop, having done it earlier in day