Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

E.D.Tenn.: SW for a cell phone includes the SD card in it

A search warrant for a cell phone includes the SD card in it. United States v. Glatz, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114963 (E.D. Tenn. July 5, 2023). A jury question on probable cause to arrest remained, and that avoids qualified … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: SW for a cell phone includes the SD card in it

OH4: Entry to recover AR-15 was reasonable, even though it was hard to find

Officers responding to a 911 call were told there was an unsecured AR-15 in the house. The entry to retrieve it was reasonable, and Caniglia v. Strom is distinguishable. State v. Pine, 2023-Ohio-2191, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2166 (4th Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH4: Entry to recover AR-15 was reasonable, even though it was hard to find

DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

The search warrant might appear general, but it was limited by the things to be searched for. The reference to “trace evidence including but not limited to blood, hair, fibers, fluids, and fingerprints” did not make it unparticular. Trace evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

E.D.Tenn.: Undated controlled buys had to be in five weeks before SW, and that’s not stale

The multiple controlled buys were undated in the search warrant application, but the common sense reading was that they were in the five weeks before the warrant issued. That shows an ongoing drug operation, and it’s not stale. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Undated controlled buys had to be in five weeks before SW, and that’s not stale

M.D.Pa.: Once police executing a warrant on a home discover it’s multi-family, the search must end and a new SW be obtained

After the police entered the building and conducted a security sweep, they discovered only then it was actually a multi-occupant dwelling. There was no outward appearance there were multiple non-family occupants. The first entry finding a gun was valid. The … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Pole cameras, Privileges, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Once police executing a warrant on a home discover it’s multi-family, the search must end and a new SW be obtained

AZ: Confession obtained after Franks violation should have been suppressed, too

The trial court found a Franks violation from the officer overstating with reckless disregard the facts, and it suppressed the search. Then came defendant’s statements based on the false search warrant affidavit. The trial court did not suppress, but the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on AZ: Confession obtained after Franks violation should have been suppressed, too

OH5, D.Minn.: Not calling additional witnesses at suppression hearing didn’t change outcome

There was reasonable suspicion for the stop here, and defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not calling another witness that wouldn’t have changed the outcome. State v. Ware, 2023-Ohio-1807 (5th Dist. May 30, 2023).* In a tax warrant case, defense counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH5, D.Minn.: Not calling additional witnesses at suppression hearing didn’t change outcome

OH10: Odor of MJ from car didn’t justify search of driver’s person

The odor of marijuana coming from a car and not a specific person in the car doesn’t justify search of defendant’s person. State v. Oliver, 2023-Ohio-1550, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 1545 (10th Dist. May 9, 2023). Defendant waived his search … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on OH10: Odor of MJ from car didn’t justify search of driver’s person

MS: SW was for stolen property from a particular victim and clothing seen in video

The warrant here was particular enough. It didn’t just seek stolen property; it sought particular property stolen from the victim and clothing worn during the burglary caught on video. Williamson v. State, 2023 Miss. App. LEXIS 125 (Apr. 4, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on MS: SW was for stolen property from a particular victim and clothing seen in video

CA3: Rule 41(g) order not appealable when property involved in criminal process

Denial of petitioner’s Rule 41(g) motion for return of property was not appealable when the property is tied up in the criminal process. It is not an exclusionary rule, and it remains available even if the government doesn’t plan on … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA3: Rule 41(g) order not appealable when property involved in criminal process

W.D.N.C.: 2255 claim of merely failing to investigate a search claim doesn’t state a post-conviction claim

2255 petition’s claim that defense counsel failed to investigate whether a motion to suppress should have been filed fails. There was a search warrant, and there’s no suggestion it was invalid. Fluid v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51173 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: 2255 claim of merely failing to investigate a search claim doesn’t state a post-conviction claim

E.D.La.: Failure to cross-examination searching officers more wouldn’t change outcome

In a long super-detailed 2254 habeas, defendant loses on all issues. As to failure to cross-examine even more the searching officer about the details of execution of the search warrant, it was speculative that it would conceivably change the outcome. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Failure to cross-examination searching officers more wouldn’t change outcome

CO: LEOs didn’t expand on private search

A private party found video of a sexual assault on defendant’s computer and provided it to law enforcement. A search warrant wasn’t needed for law enforcement to view that file. People v. Morse, 2023 COA 27, 2023 Colo. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search, Seizure | Comments Off on CO: LEOs didn’t expand on private search

TX: Totality of circumstances applies to exigency on warrantless seizure of cell phone

“Rather than announcing a categorical rule that police may never seize personal property simply because a criminal suspect knows he is a suspect, the court of appeals should have analyzed under the totality of the circumstances whether law enforcement’s seizure … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TX: Totality of circumstances applies to exigency on warrantless seizure of cell phone

CA9: “Clearly established law” in one sentence

“Cardenas has not identified any case holding that police officers violated the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest under similar circumstances, and we are not aware of any such case.” Cardenas v. Saladen, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 5091 (9th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: “Clearly established law” in one sentence

E.D.Ky.: Failure to cross-examine at trial on some contradictions from SW affidavit was not IAC

Defendant’s 2255 ineffective assistance of counsel claim in part challenged defense counsel’s failure to cross-examine over contradictions in a search warrant affidavit by the witness. The government doesn’t address this, and assuming it was defective performance, the court finds a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Failure to cross-examine at trial on some contradictions from SW affidavit was not IAC

CA9: Denying owner access to an impounded car for 30 days is an unreasonable seizure

Denying access to one’s car for 30 days after impoundment without justification was an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Untalan v. Stanley, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 4070 (9th Cir. Feb. 22, 2023). CI information led to surveillance then two … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Denying owner access to an impounded car for 30 days is an unreasonable seizure

AR: Search incident to sex offense produced microSD cards that could be seized

Defendant was arrested for a sex offense, and his search incident produced three microSD cards that fell to the ground. They were properly seized and then searched with a warrant finding child porn. Lewis v. State, 2023 Ark. 12, 2023 … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Search incident, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Search incident to sex offense produced microSD cards that could be seized

AL: Effective assistance of counsel doesn’t require defense counsel to forecast changes in 4A law

Defense counsel moved to suppress BAC results, but not on Fourth Amendment grounds. The motion was heard and denied. Now defendant claims ineffective assistance for failing to make a Fourth Amendment claim, too. The court finds that the motion was … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on AL: Effective assistance of counsel doesn’t require defense counsel to forecast changes in 4A law

E.D.Va.: No 4A right to notice before a search occurs; state search law inapplicable in federal court

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim is that he was given no notice that his phones had been searched, citing Virginia law, which is irrelevant in a federal prosecution, even though state officials did all the searching. There’s no constitutional right to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonableness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: No 4A right to notice before a search occurs; state search law inapplicable in federal court