Category Archives: Good faith exception

CA8: Some evidence of nexus saves SW under GFE

Under the good faith exception, executing officers are entitled to rely on the magistrate judge’s nexus finding with some actual basis they can reasonably rely on, even if it technically might have been wrong. United States v. Barnes, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Pretext | Comments Off on CA8: Some evidence of nexus saves SW under GFE

W.D.N.Y.: Govt’s failure to raise GFE before USMJ is waiver

Government waived the good faith exception by not raising it before the USMJ. United States v. Stearns, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154919 (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2021). The trial court didn’t make sufficient findings on whether a handgun in plain view … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Govt’s failure to raise GFE before USMJ is waiver

CAAF: When PC for warrant was a close call, GFE applies

The question of probable cause for defendant’s UA was a close call. Therefore, the good faith exception applies. The officers essentially did everything right and that should be rewarded, and there’s no reason to reverse the finding of probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches | Comments Off on CAAF: When PC for warrant was a close call, GFE applies

CA7: GFE inquiry seems to include merits of PC, even when court doesn’t have to go there

The district court decided this case solely on the good faith exception and never reached probable cause. So does the court of appeals. The affidavit had a presumption of validity, which defendant recognizes, and it was not bare bones. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA7: GFE inquiry seems to include merits of PC, even when court doesn’t have to go there

N.D.Okla.: Motion to suppress must allege basis to overcome GFE, too

Defendant’s motion to suppress must show a fact dispute to get a hearing, including on application of the good faith exception. United States v. Bailey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138557 (N.D.Okla. July 26, 2021):

Posted in Good faith exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Motion to suppress must allege basis to overcome GFE, too

CA6: DEA can get state SWs and assist in state investigations, then go federal

DEA officers can get search warrants in federal investigations from state judges for state law violations aiding state officers. That doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment or Rule 41. And, there is also the good faith exception. United States v. Williams, … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: DEA can get state SWs and assist in state investigations, then go federal

CA8: SW for CP didn’t include “cell phone” in “electronic devices,” but GFE covers it

The search warrant here was for electronic devices that could hold child pornography, and it failed to specifically mention defendant’s cell phone. The good faith exception, however, overcame this omission of particularity. United States v. Pospisil, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on CA8: SW for CP didn’t include “cell phone” in “electronic devices,” but GFE covers it

CA7: Officers complied with law in getting CSLI by exigency; Carpenter came two months after trial

Defendant was the subject of exigency based efforts to get his CSLI because he was actively being pursued as involved in a 2013 burglary investigation scoring 25 firearms. The CSLI request complied with the law at the time. Carpenter was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA7: Officers complied with law in getting CSLI by exigency; Carpenter came two months after trial

D.P.R.: Passing reference to a 4A violation in motion to suppress doesn’t preserve it

Passing reference to a Fourth Amendment violation isn’t enough to preserve the issue. United States v. Polaco-Hance, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132937 (D.P.R. July 16, 2021). There was probable cause for the search of defendant’s car under the warrant. A … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Motion to suppress, Plain view, feel, smell, Waiver | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Passing reference to a 4A violation in motion to suppress doesn’t preserve it

D.Ariz.: 4A IAC claim fails for failing to show how outcome would change and because 4A wasn’t violated

“Movant argues that the warrantless search and seizure of the victim’s blood-stained clothing violated his Fourth Amendment rights and that his trial counsel’s failure to challenge the search and seizure was ineffective assistance because ‘there exists more than a reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: 4A IAC claim fails for failing to show how outcome would change and because 4A wasn’t violated

S.D.Ga.: SW for this motel room wasn’t stale after two days

While a search warrant for a motel room, a more transient place than a home, might get stale faster, this one didn’t considering the nature of the allegations. “[B]ased on the totality of the circumstances, the evidence was not stale … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: SW for this motel room wasn’t stale after two days

CA8: Cell tower warrant to ID robbers was reasonable and with PC

Cell phone tower warrant in an effort to solve multiple robberies by identifying repeated phone use was reasonable when the question is a “substantial basis,” which there was. United States v. James, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 20336 (8th Cir. July … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: Cell tower warrant to ID robbers was reasonable and with PC

CA11: Including omitted information under Franks still left PC

The omission here was not a Franks violation. “Here, even if Jackson’s statement had been included in the affidavit, it would not have tipped the balance. The officers still would have had probable cause to search the home, because the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA11: Including omitted information under Franks still left PC

CA6: CI’s PC doesn’t have to be decided because there was good faith

The district court erred in finding no probable cause on information from defendant’s CI and no good faith exception. The CI was stopped one day out of jail driving a stolen motorbike that he said came from defendant. “In the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: CI’s PC doesn’t have to be decided because there was good faith

RI: One-sentence description of alleged CP didn’t show PC

The twelve word one-sentence description of defendant’s alleged child pornography was insufficient to show probable cause. The court declines the state’s invitation to adopt the good faith exception without adequate briefing. State v. Reisner, 2021 R.I. LEXIS 87 (June 30, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on RI: One-sentence description of alleged CP didn’t show PC

CA3: GFE saved CP search district court found lacked PC

Officers obtained a search warrant for defendant possessing child pornography based on his interest in unclothed children and taking pictures. The district court suppressed, but the good faith exception applies to save the search. The government appealed on both probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: GFE saved CP search district court found lacked PC

WI: Warrantless blood draw from incapacitated driver unconstitutional

Wisconsin’s statute allegedly permitting blood draws of incapacitated drivers is unconstitutional for lack of actual consent, but the good faith exception saves it today. State v. Prado, 2021 WI 64, 2021 Wisc. LEXIS 98 (June 18, 2021):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on WI: Warrantless blood draw from incapacitated driver unconstitutional

D.Conn.: Unreasonable delay in getting SW for cell phone defeats GFE

Where the officers impermissibly delayed obtaining a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone, the good faith exception does not apply. The initial seizure of the phone was valid because it was left at a crime scene. United States v. Tisdol, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Unreasonable delay in getting SW for cell phone defeats GFE

CA3: Ghostwritten SW affidavit not a Franks violation because there was indisputably PC

A police officer’s admission at trial that the affidavit for search warrant was ghostwritten for him didn’t show a Franks violation because there clearly was probable cause. United States v. Ware, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16568 (3d Cir. June 3, … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Ghostwritten SW affidavit not a Franks violation because there was indisputably PC

CA3: SW including “any and all cell phones” could be overbroad, but not here where there were only two

“Taylor contends that the description of ‘any and all cellular telephones’ contained in this warrant is overly broad and thus lacks the requisite particularity. Although a warrant allowing seizure of ‘any and all cellular telephones’ may be overbroad, this record … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth | Comments Off on CA3: SW including “any and all cell phones” could be overbroad, but not here where there were only two