D.N.M.: Arrest on warrant in car timed to facilitate pretextual inventory; suppressed

Officers had an arrest warrant for defendant, so they waited until he left his house, stopped him a half mile away and conducted an inventory of his car and had it towed. The court finds the inventory pretextual because it had nothing to do with his offense, and the arrest seemed timed to create the excuse for inventory. They knew where he lived so close, and the car could have been taken back there. United States v. Chavira, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175633 (D.N.M. Oct. 6, 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Arrest on warrant in car timed to facilitate pretextual inventory; suppressed

WaPo: UC-Berkeley students sue Google, alleging their emails were illegally scanned

WaPo: UC-Berkeley students sue Google, alleging their emails were illegally scanned by Emma Brown:

Four students and alumni from the University of California-Berkeley have sued Google in federal court, alleging that the company — which runs the university’s email accounts — illegally intercepted and scanned emails for advertising purposes without students’ knowledge or consent.

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on WaPo: UC-Berkeley students sue Google, alleging their emails were illegally scanned

CA7: No REP from being videoed by CI one lets in for a drug deal

A video-wired CI came into defendant’s apartment to record him doing a drug deal, and a SW issued based on the recording. Defendant challenged the entry and the recording but not the SW. “Thompson has never challenged the search warrant or moved to suppress the drugs recovered during its execution, which leaves us puzzled about the point of this appeal. Evidence might be inadmissible if discovered while executing a search warrant that rests principally on information obtained illegally.” Inviting in the informant did not violate Jones or Jardines. United States v. Thompson, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1688 (7th Cir. Feb. 1, 2016).

Defendant was a passenger in a car stopped for no license plate light. Defendant was asked his name and bolted. That was reasonable suspicion to chase and catch him. United States v. Waller, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175558 (N.D.Ga. Dec. 14, 2015).*

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: No REP from being videoed by CI one lets in for a drug deal

D.Nev.: Since possession of neither shotgun nor hypodermic needle are crimes, stop invalid

Police received a call about a man passed out in a Lexus in a parking lot with a hypodermic needle sticking in his arm and a shotgun next to him. When they got there, defendant was out of the car, got in it and drove away. They did a felony stop. There was no reasonable suspicion for the stop. Possession of the gun and the needle are not crimes. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Lafon, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175487 (D.Nev. Dec. 23, 2015), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10162 (D.Nev. Jan. 27, 2016).

A zoning appeal and having to pay the fees associated with it are not a Fourth Amendment seizure. Foley v. Orange County, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1494 (11th Cir. Jan. 29, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Since possession of neither shotgun nor hypodermic needle are crimes, stop invalid

CA4: Feres doctrine barred Army NG officer’s § 1983 email search claim when he was deployed

Plaintiff was a Colonel in the North Carolina Army National Guard stationed in Kuwait, and he claimed that his email was unlawfully searched by another officer and forwarded around in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. The Feres doctrine, requiring abstention of virtually any military related litigation, applies to § 1983 claims against the state National Guard, too. Aikens v. Ingram, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1502 (4th Cir. Jan. 29, 2016).

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Military searches | Comments Off on CA4: Feres doctrine barred Army NG officer’s § 1983 email search claim when he was deployed

NY Times: New Technologies Give Government Ample Means to Track Suspects, Study Finds

NY Times: New Technologies Give Government Ample Means to Track Suspects, Study Finds by David E. Sanger:

Now, a study in which current and former intelligence officials participated concludes that the warning is wildly overblown, and that a raft of new technologies — like television sets with microphones and web-connected cars — are creating ample opportunities for the government to track suspects, many of them worrying.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NY Times: New Technologies Give Government Ample Means to Track Suspects, Study Finds

techdirt: DHS Official Thinks People Should Have To Give Up Their Anonymity To Use The Internet

techdirt: DHS Official Thinks People Should Have To Give Up Their Anonymity To Use The Internet by Tim Cushing:

Apparently, the only way to stop terrorists from hating us for our freedom is to strip away those offensive freedoms.

Erik Barnett, the DHS’s attache to the European Union, pitched some freedom-stripping ideas to a presumably more receptive audience via an article for a French policy magazine. Leveraging both the recent Paris attacks and the omnipresent law enforcement excuse for any bad idea — child porn — Barnett suggested victory in the War on Terror can be achieved by stripping internet users of their anonymity. You know, all of them, not just the terrorists.

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on techdirt: DHS Official Thinks People Should Have To Give Up Their Anonymity To Use The Internet

St. Louis Public Radio: Missouri bill would define open records access for police cameras

St. Louis Public Radio: Missouri bill would define open records access for police cameras by Camille Phillips:

A Kansas City-area Republican is sponsoring a bill that would set limits on when police camera footage is public record in Missouri. The bill would block access to body camera recordings shot in homes, hospitals and schools unless the investigation is closed and someone in the video requests it.

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on St. Louis Public Radio: Missouri bill would define open records access for police cameras

CA7: WI’s lifetime GPS monitoring of released SVPs is reasonable under 4A

Plaintiff was civilly committed as a sexually violent predator and finally released with GPS monitoring for life. Such monitoring is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment compared to parole searches, and the state has shown that there is a likelihood that it deters further crimes and, at the minimum, provides evidence of where he was at all times should he do so. Belleau v. Wall, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1517 (7th Cir. Jan. 29, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA7: WI’s lifetime GPS monitoring of released SVPs is reasonable under 4A

CA5: No joint venture between DEA and Colombian police to wiretap Colombia nationals’ cell phones there so no 4A challenge here

Colombian nationals had no connection to the United States at the time the Colombia National Police wiretapped their Colombian cell phones in Colombia. This evidence came in when they were indicted in the Eastern District of Texas for conspiracy to import thousands of kilos of cocaine into the United States. There was no joint venture in this investigation between the DEA and Colombian officers at the time of the wiretaps. Therefore, they could not make a Fourth Amendment challenge in here to the legality of the Colombian wiretaps. United States v. Rojas, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1396 (5th Cir. Jan. 28, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches | Comments Off on CA5: No joint venture between DEA and Colombian police to wiretap Colombia nationals’ cell phones there so no 4A challenge here

W.D.Pa.: Request for a Franks hearing obviated by def’s lack of standing in place searched

To get a Franks hearing, it’s necessary to make an offer of proof, and defendant failed to do so. Defendant does not get a Franks hearing here because he also didn’t show that he’d have standing to make the challenge in the place searched to begin with. Defendant’s argument that police should have obtained an anticipatory warrant fails because there was no way to anticipate one here. United States v. Woodley, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9479 (W.D.Pa. Jan. 27, 2016).

Codefendant had no standing to join in one defendant’s motion to suppress apartment search. United States v. Ford, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10025 (D.D.C. Jan. 28, 2016).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Request for a Franks hearing obviated by def’s lack of standing in place searched

TN: Where arrest lacked PC, search incident is void

The evidence did not support defendant’s arrest for public intoxication, and the officer actually lacked probable cause. Accordingly, the search incident to the arrest was void. State v. Pippen, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 57 (Jan. 28, 2016) (dissent here).

No reasonable expectation of privacy was violated by officers entering the public work area of a tattoo parlor where a gun was seen. United States v. Lewis, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175451 (W.D.Mo. Dec. 4, 2015), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9403 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 27, 2016).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on TN: Where arrest lacked PC, search incident is void

Kentucky Center for Investigative Reporting: How An Illegal Court Ruling Helped Break This Kentucky Man

Kentucky Center for Investigative Reporting: How An Illegal Court Ruling Helped Break This Kentucky Man by R.G. Dunlop:

Denver Stewart has no trouble reciting those injustices. They date all the way back to October 1997, when court officials in Pike County illegally banished him from the state for two years for possessing marijuana. Just 21 years old, with a wife and a young son, he was given barely 48 hours to pack up and get out of town, to go ‘west of the Mississippi River.’ When Stewart returned to the county following his banishment, he was repeatedly arrested and jailed — seven or eight times, by his count — on felony assault charges associated with the marijuana case. The appeals court concluded these arrests should never have occurred and that Stewart should not have been jailed in connection with them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Kentucky Center for Investigative Reporting: How An Illegal Court Ruling Helped Break This Kentucky Man

Atlantic: None to the Right of Samuel Alito

Atlantic: None to the Right of Samuel Alito by Tom Donnelly and Brianne Gorod:

A decade into his tenure on the Court, Samuel Alito has emerged as the most solidly conservative justice on the bench.

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Atlantic: None to the Right of Samuel Alito

WaPo: FBI use of hacking tool to find child-porn users affirmed

WaPo: FBI use of hacking tool to find child-porn users affirmed by Ellen Nakashima:

Over the past week, two federal judges have found that the government’s use of software in a mass hacking of child-porn websites to identify users is constitutional. The findings by judges in Tacoma, Wash., and Milwaukee are the first in an uncharted and technically complex area of law.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: FBI use of hacking tool to find child-porn users affirmed

CA2: Crossing threshold to arrest without warrant violates Fourth Amendment

Officers stepping across the threshold to arrest without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Allen, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1467 (2d Cir. Jan. 29, 2016):

“[W]hen it comes to the Fourth Amendment, the home is first among equals.” Florida v. Jardines, 133 S. Ct. 1409, 1414 (2013). At the Amendment’s “very core stands the right of a man to retreat into his home and there be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion.” Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505, 511 (1961). In Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980), the Supreme Court held that, in the absence of exigent circumstances, the Amendment prohibits law enforcement officials from making a warrantless and nonconsensual entry into a suspect’s home to arrest him.
Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA2: Crossing threshold to arrest without warrant violates Fourth Amendment

S.D.N.Y.: Motion to suppress denied for lack of proffer on standing

Defendant’s motion to suppress was denied because he didn’t even suggest in his papers he had standing in the vehicle he was only a passenger in. United States v. Londonio, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8472 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2016).

There was a fair probability that criminal evidence would be found on defendant’s phone in a 19 month drug trafficking investigation. United States v. Hernandez, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175324 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2015), aff’d, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8276 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 2016), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8277 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2016).*

Posted in Motion to suppress, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Motion to suppress denied for lack of proffer on standing

OH5: Not unreasonable to deny passenger permission to retrieve purse before dog sniff of car

The smell of burning marijuana was probable cause for a car search. The officer’s refusal to let the passenger retrieve her purse from the car before the search did not violate the Fourth Amendment. State v. Eiler, 2016-Ohio-224, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 198 (5th Dist. Jan. 21, 2016).

Defendant was stopped because of an expired tag, so the pretext argument fails. The officer learned, running the tags, the vehicle was involved in an attempted murder, and that justified further detention. “Like Rodriguez, Officer McConnell conducted a routine traffic stop and a dog-sniff search of the Defendant’s car. Unlike Rodriguez, the police had grounds to expand the scope of the search. Officer McConnell received a police report stating that Mr. Waters’ red Nissan 200sx coupe was a ‘felony vehicle’ and that its occupants were armed and dangerous and wanted in connection with an attempted murder.” United States v. Waters, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175341 (D.Nev. June 29, 2015).*

Posted in Collective knowledge, Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH5: Not unreasonable to deny passenger permission to retrieve purse before dog sniff of car

D.N.J.: No REP in a rental car where def not an authorized driver and car was way overdue

Defendant was driving a rental car that was so overdue the tags were expired. It was rented by a cousin and the rental car company didn’t know who he was. With the stop, they were called and they wanted the car impounded. It was towed to the tow yard. The officer forgot to leave the rental agreement with it and followed to the tow yard. When he opened the door, he saw for the first time a gun sticking out from under the seat. Defendant had no standing in this rental car because he could show nothing that would suggest standing because of his tenuous relationship to it. In addition, once the rental company requested it be impounded, he lost any reasonable expectation of privacy that he would have conceivably had. United States v. Roberts, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10233 (D.N.J. Jan. 28, 2016).

Defendant was accused of sexually molesting the daughter of the woman he lived with. She could consent to a search of their place, and guns were found. He can’t claim the benefit of Randolph because he didn’t object. United States v. Jones, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175413 (N.D.Ind. Dec. 16, 2015),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9169 (N.D.Ind. Jan. 27, 2016).

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.N.J.: No REP in a rental car where def not an authorized driver and car was way overdue

SC: Reading a computer SN was a “search” under Hicks, but it was permitted under a valid probation search

Defendant was on probation and believed to be involved in a murder where a red widescreen Acer laptop was taken. Probation officers went to his house to talk to him with reasonable suspicion, and he was sitting there with a red widescreen Acer laptop in his lap. The likelihood that it was taken during the murder was high. Officers checked the serial number and it matched. Reading the serial number was a search under Arizona v. Hicks, but it was reasonable because it was done during a probation search with proper justification. State v. Edwards, 2016 S.C. App. LEXIS 4 (Jan. 27, 2016).

Defendant’s arrest for bank robbery was premised on a stop after following the tracking device. There was no good description of the robbers other than the car, and there was the car with the tracking device inside. United States v. Bell, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8254 (D.Nev. Jan. 25, 2016).*

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Search | Comments Off on SC: Reading a computer SN was a “search” under Hicks, but it was permitted under a valid probation search