S.D.N.Y.: Motion to suppress denied for lack of proffer on standing

Defendant’s motion to suppress was denied because he didn’t even suggest in his papers he had standing in the vehicle he was only a passenger in. United States v. Londonio, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8472 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2016).

There was a fair probability that criminal evidence would be found on defendant’s phone in a 19 month drug trafficking investigation. United States v. Hernandez, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175324 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2015), aff’d, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8276 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 2016), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8277 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Motion to suppress, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.