CA10: NCMEC is govt agent not a subject to private search doctrine; email a “paper” or “effect” for 4A

NCMEC is a government actor because of how the government treats and funds it, and the private search doctrine does not apply to it. AOL here captured emails with child pornography and forwarded them to NCMEC which further searched them, and an email is a “paper” and “effect” under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Ackerman, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14411 (10th Cir. Aug. 5, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on CA10: NCMEC is govt agent not a subject to private search doctrine; email a “paper” or “effect” for 4A

The Texas Tribune: What Are Your Rights at U.S.-Mexico Border Patrol Checkpoints?

The Texas Tribune: What Are Your Rights at U.S.-Mexico Border Patrol Checkpoints? by Julián Aguilar:

Under federal law, checkpoints are legal. But officers do have limits in what they can ask you.

Posted in Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on The Texas Tribune: What Are Your Rights at U.S.-Mexico Border Patrol Checkpoints?

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Utah SWAT stats show militarized tactics used less, but still overwhelmingly for drug crimes

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Utah SWAT stats show militarized tactics used less, but still overwhelmingly for drug crimes by Radley Balko:

That’s a massive increase in the use of tactics that are inherently volatile, risky and violent. It’s unfortunate that Utah is the only state where legislators believe such a trend demands some transparency.

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Utah SWAT stats show militarized tactics used less, but still overwhelmingly for drug crimes

techdirt: Sheriff Uses Unconstitutional Law To Raid Home And Seize Electronics Belonging To Watchdog Blogger

techdirt: Sheriff Uses Unconstitutional Law To Raid Home And Seize Electronics Belonging To Watchdog Blogger by Tim Cushing:

A Louisiana sheriff has just inserted himself into a mess of First and Fourth Amendment violations by using his power to go after an anonymous blogger who claimed he was corrupt. Naomi LaChance of The Intercept has more details.
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on techdirt: Sheriff Uses Unconstitutional Law To Raid Home And Seize Electronics Belonging To Watchdog Blogger

WI: Consent to a blood draw or suffer DL revo was still voluntary consent

Defendant consented to a blood draw knowing that his license would have been revoked if he didn’t. “Blackman, by choosing to give actual consent, made a voluntary choice. The choice was Blackman’s alone and, as such, was not coerced.” State v. Blackman, 2016 Wisc. App. LEXIS 499 (Aug. 3, 2016).*

Defendant was more credible than the officers on the question of consent, and the government failed to prove it. United States v. Rodriguez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101794 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2016).*

The trial court erred in finding that claimant didn’t have ownership of the vehicles being forfeited because he had actual title. He loses on the merits, however, because the state showed he was not an innocent owner. In re 2000 GMC Denali & Contents, 2016 Mich. App. LEXIS 1468 (Aug. 2, 2016).*

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Standing | Comments Off on WI: Consent to a blood draw or suffer DL revo was still voluntary consent

CA8: Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search

Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search. Nance v. Humane Society to Pulaski County, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14239 (8th Cir. Aug. 4, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA8: Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search

CA8: Apparent hidden compartment under trunk raised RS to PC

Defendant consented to a search of his car during a stop because of something dragging under the car. He was asked because he was nervous. In the trunk, the officer noticed the carpet was glued down, and that indicated to him that the carpet covered a hidden compartment. Under the car, it was apparent there was a compartment welded to the bottom. This, coupled with everything else, rose to probable cause. United States v. Zamora-Garcia, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13986 (8th Cir. Aug. 2, 2016).

The officer had reasonable suspicion for a stop of defendant based on his recent alleged crimes and possession of a weapon. When stopped, defendant’s movements suggested he was armed. United States v. Chandler, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100527 (E.D.N.Y. June 16, 2016).*

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Apparent hidden compartment under trunk raised RS to PC

ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional?

ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional? by Debra Cassens Weiss

No. The fact police think it’s not speaks to their psychology.

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional?

N.D.Cal.: Conversations outside courthouse were entitled to REP

Surreptitious recordings outside the San Mateo courthouse of persons talking amongst themselves were entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy because they talked such that others could not overhear them except with planted recording devices. United States v. Giraudo, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100486 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2016), supplemental opinion, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176813 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 21, 2016) (posted here):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Conversations outside courthouse were entitled to REP

NJ: Joint occupancy by adults with separate bedrooms doesn’t give apparent authority over each other’s rooms

Because of the heightened privacy protection in the home, it was unreasonable for the officer here to conclude that one adult resident of a home could consent to a search of the room of another adult resident. “Third parties derive authority from common and joint use of space. That requirement calls for careful scrutiny when applied to parties who are not the homeowners yet are purporting to authorize consent to search the bedroom of an adult in the home in which he resides. Here, the officer failed to ask adequate questions at the scene before he followed Mylroie into defendant’s room and then peered into his closet. Officer Ziarnowski could not have relied on an apparent authority by Mylroie as the basis for valid third-party consent to his initial search of defendant’s bedroom.” State v. Cushing, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 723 (Aug. 3, 2016). Syllabus:
Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on NJ: Joint occupancy by adults with separate bedrooms doesn’t give apparent authority over each other’s rooms

CA9: Dist.Ct. erred in finding apparent authority over a briefcase that the consenter had no interest in when owner was objecting

The district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants on a third party consent issue. There was no reason to believe that the person they sought consent from had an equal or superior control over the briefcase at issue, including not having the combination to it. Plaintiff didn’t and didn’t consent. Willis v. Mullins, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13921 (9th Cir. Aug. 1, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on CA9: Dist.Ct. erred in finding apparent authority over a briefcase that the consenter had no interest in when owner was objecting

M.D.Fla.: The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential”

The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential.” United States v. Collins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101003 (M.D.Fla. May 31, 2016), adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101001 (M.D.Fla. Aug. 2, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential”

E.D.N.C.: Information about the amorphous “they” wasn’t probable cause here

“For all these reasons, the Court is persuaded that probable cause requires more than what the agents in this case knew at the time of arrest. Here, the strongest evidence the agents had was that the broker reported ‘they’ were there (though where exactly is unclear) around the time (though when exactly is unclear) the red BMW arrived at the La Quinta. However, the broker never indicated who ‘they’ were or what ‘they’ were there to do—which, due to a circumstance of the agents’ own making, could have been to attempt to repair the car. Aside from that message, all the agents had at the time they made the decision to arrest was a man who parked near and approached a car. At the time the arrest was actually made, agents also knew the man sat in the car for a few minutes, giving no indication he was aware the car contained drugs, then exited and appeared to prepare to leave the scene and the drugs. The Court cannot find that these events, without more, created probable cause that that man had committed, was committing, or was about to commit a crime.” United States v. Moreles-Albear, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100305 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2016).*

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Information about the amorphous “they” wasn’t probable cause here

FoxNews: Border Patrol’s website offers advice on eluding … Border Patrol

FoxNews: Border Patrol’s website offers advice on eluding … Border Patrol:
Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on FoxNews: Border Patrol’s website offers advice on eluding … Border Patrol

S.D.N.Y.: Buying a vehicle and loaning it for a drug run is a loss of the REP; denial of knowledge of a secret compartment is a waiver of the REP

Defendant who bought a vehicle and then loaned it to another to do a drug run lacked standing in the vehicle. “Having provided the Yukon to Sandy for purposes of making the trip to New Orleans, Jorge Gomez thereby relinquished any expectation of privacy in the vehicle.” Denial of knowledge of a secret compartment in a vehicle is a waiver of any claim of a reasonable expectation of privacy in the compartment. United States v. Gomez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99920 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2016).

The district court logically could conclude that the officer was more credible about defendant’s stop than defendant who lied repeatedly during the traffic stop and tried to get the passenger to lie, too. The district court found the search of the car valid as an inventory search, and defendant doesn’t challenge it on appeal. United States v. Vires, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13864 (8th Cir. Aug. 1, 2016).*

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Buying a vehicle and loaning it for a drug run is a loss of the REP; denial of knowledge of a secret compartment is a waiver of the REP

ABAJ: Chemerinsky: Has the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Fourth Amendment?

ABA Journal: Chemerinsky: Has the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Fourth Amendment? by Erwin Chemerinsky:

In the recently completed Supreme Court term, Utah v. Strieff was the only major decision where the conservatives prevailed in an ideologically divided case. The court held that evidence gained after an illegal police stop is admissible if the police learn of an outstanding arrest warrant and then conduct a search.

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on ABAJ: Chemerinsky: Has the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Fourth Amendment?

NJ requires court order to get telephone records, but PC not required

New Jersey requires a court order, albeit on less than probable cause, to get telephone records. To enable criminal investigations to proceed, probable cause isn’t required. State v. Lunsford, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 717 (Aug. 1, 2016) (syllabus):
Continue reading →

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NJ requires court order to get telephone records, but PC not required

MI dismisses grant of discretionary review on application of Jardines to a knock-and-talk

Michigan granted discretionary review to determine the application of Jardines to a knock-and-talk, but dismissed it after considering the briefs. Three justices dissented from declining to decide the case. People v. Radandt, 2016 Mich. LEXIS 1591 (July 29, 2016)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on MI dismisses grant of discretionary review on application of Jardines to a knock-and-talk

W.D.Tex.: Exigencies of crack deal going down in hotel room excused warrant

There was more than probable cause, and inference on inference here showed it on the totality. A crack cocaine deal going down in a hotel room proved to be exigent circumstances. It would take two hours to get a search warrant, but this was developing fast. Also, the officers did not manufacture the exigency. United States v. Scott, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187633 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2014)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Exigencies of crack deal going down in hotel room excused warrant

S.D.Ill.: “perfunctory, one-sentence argument” in motion to suppress was no motion at all

“Mr. Lee made a perfunctory, one-sentence argument that the evidence seized during the search of his residence should be suppressed because there was ‘no probable cause to believe evidence related to [the charged] offenses would be found in Jonesboro Arkansas let alone within the private bedroom of Defendant’s son.’” “See, e.g., United States v. Collins, 796 F.3d 829, 836 (7th Cir. 2015) (‘The parties—not the courts—must research and construct available legal arguments. … Accordingly, this Court has long warned that ‘perfunctory and undeveloped arguments’ are deemed waived.’).” “Simply put, Mr. Lee identified possible arguments, but did not affirmatively make them.” United States v. Lee, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98663 (S.D.Ill. July 28, 2016).

During a consent encounter, defendant first consented to a search of his person, but he withdrew his consent by putting his hand in his pocket. He pulled out drugs and threw them on the ground, and the motion to suppress was properly denied because of the plain view. State v. Milos, 294 Neb. 375, 2016 Neb. LEXIS 113 (July 29, 2016).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: “perfunctory, one-sentence argument” in motion to suppress was no motion at all