W.D.Tex.: Exigencies of crack deal going down in hotel room excused warrant

There was more than probable cause, and inference on inference here showed it on the totality. A crack cocaine deal going down in a hotel room proved to be exigent circumstances. It would take two hours to get a search warrant, but this was developing fast. Also, the officers did not manufacture the exigency. United States v. Scott, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187633 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2014)*:

However, exigent circumstances arose in the reasonable belief of the detectives before the detectives could obtain a warrant, which required entering before the warrant could be obtained. “It is ‘axiomatic that agents are not required to obtain a search warrant as soon as it is practicable to do so.’ Agents ‘conducting an ongoing investigation do not need to obtain a warrant at the first opportunity. If exigencies arise before agents can obtain a warrant, they can justifiably act.'” United States v. Rodea, 102 F.3d 1401, 1409 (5th Cir. 1996) (citations omitted). As Detective Dolan’s testimony reflected, this operation moved very quickly.

This entry was posted in Emergency / exigency. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.