N-M: PC close, but there; exclusion has no deterrent value

The probable cause for this military search warrant was close and still existed, but exclusion would have no deterrent value. Mil. R. Evid. 311(a)(3) & 311(d)(5)(A). Moreover, omissions from the affidavit would have only strengthened the probable cause showing. United States v. Blevins, 2026 CCA LEXIS 467 (N-M Ct. Crim. App. Oct. 26, 2026) (unpublished).*

The windshield crack went in front of the driver and was reasonable suspicion for a stop. United States v. Woeppel, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 243429 (D. Mont. Oct. 23, 2026).*

“[W]e need not determine the precise moment of seizure in this case. Even if the encounter ripened into a seizure sometime before Harris saw the bulge, the seizure would have been supported by reasonable suspicion.” United States v. Ozomaro, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 32491 (6th Cir. Oct. 22, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Military searches, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.