D.Nev.: Officer came to def’s house on a domestic call and had no RS def was armed; frisk invalid

Responding to a domestic call, the officer met defendant at the door and he was compliant and holding a bag. There was no reason to believe that defendant was armed, but a stop and frisk was done, actually finding a gun. The stop and frisk was unreasonable. United States v. Smith, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71248 (D. Nev. March 2, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71725 (D. Nev. May 9, 2017)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Officer came to def’s house on a domestic call and had no RS def was armed; frisk invalid

IN: Officers lacked RS to take gun off an otherwise law abiding citizen based on a citizen informant tip def had a gun

A cab driver called the police because defendant dropped a gun. The cab driver feared he was to be robbed (but he wasn’t). The police showed up and claimed defendant acted nervous. (Only a little.) The frisk and removal of the weapon was unreasonable on the totality, even granting that the police did the right thing in the first place by inquiring, which they could at least do. There has to be balance between the Second Amendment right to possess a firearm, and the search and seizure to remove the gun from a law abiding citizen. Here, there was no reasonable suspicion, and the gun could not be used as evidence. Pinner v. State, 2017 Ind. LEXIS 354 (May 9, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Officers lacked RS to take gun off an otherwise law abiding citizen based on a citizen informant tip def had a gun

GA: Smell of MJ on def’s person and not in his truck justified search of person

During a traffic stop, the officer noticed that defendant’s eyes were bloodshot and glassy, and his taste buds were white and risen. The officer smelled raw marijuana when he approached defendant’s truck; noticed that the odor dissipated during the search of the truck while the doors were open and while defendant was not in the vehicle. He did not find marijuana in the truck, but he smelled marijuana pretty strongly again when he approached defendant after the vehicle search. That justified a patdown and marijuana was found on defendant’s person. Caffee v. State, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 199 (May 10, 2017).

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on GA: Smell of MJ on def’s person and not in his truck justified search of person

Three on consent

Defendant was 41 years old and Mirandized before he voluntarily consented. United States v. Elcock, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70549 (D. V.I. May 9, 2017).

Defendant consented to the search of his cell phone, and it was copied before he withdrew his consent. United States v. Campbell, 2017 CCA LEXIS 321 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. April 25, 2017).

There was clear testimony of apparent authority and cooperation in the consent to search that led to defendant’s arrest. United States v. Brothers, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8262 (2d Cir. May 10, 2017).*

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on Three on consent

D.Ariz.: In a rare departure from the norm, court finds there was no RS for def’s stop near the border

Based on the totality of circumstances (“(1) characteristics of the area; (2) proximity to the border; (3) usual patterns of traffic and time of day; (4) previous alien or drug smuggling in the area; (5) behavior of the driver, including obvious attempts to evade officers; (6) appearance or behavior of passengers; (7) model and appearance of the vehicle; and, (8) officer experience.”) there was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop near the border. United States v. Ortiz-Gualajara, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70620 (D. Ariz. April 14, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70627 (D. Ariz. May 9, 2017).

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: In a rare departure from the norm, court finds there was no RS for def’s stop near the border

Constitution Center: A Twenty-First Century Framework for Digital Privacy

Constitution Center: A Twenty-First Century Framework for Digital Privacy: Balancing Privacy and Security in the Digital Age by Jeffrey Rosen:
Introduction: A Twenty-First Century Framework for Digital Privacy

At the beginning of the twenty-first century, breathtaking changes in technology pose stark challenges to privacy and security. Private companies collect massive amounts of consumer data—information that often contains intimate details about our personal lives, from the people that we email to the apps that we use to the websites that we visit. Law enforcement often seeks to access this information when investigating suspected criminals and terrorists, and the data itself is highly mobile, with companies able to send it across borders at the tap of a button. At the same time, hackers threaten our personal data through cyberattacks, and sophisticated users shield the contents of their data from law enforcement through the use of cutting-edge encryption tools.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, E-mail | Comments Off on Constitution Center: A Twenty-First Century Framework for Digital Privacy

Motherboard: This Is the Secret Court Order That Forced the NSA to Delete the Data It Collected About You

Motherboard: This Is the Secret Court Order That Forced the NSA to Delete the Data It Collected About You

The court found an “institutional lack of candor on NSA’s part and emphasized that this is a very serious Fourth Amendment issue.”
Continue reading →

Posted in National security | Comments Off on Motherboard: This Is the Secret Court Order That Forced the NSA to Delete the Data It Collected About You

ABAJ: ABA expresses concern about border searches of lawyer laptops and other electronic devices

ABAJ: ABA expresses concern about border searches of lawyer laptops and other electronic devices by Debra Cassens Weiss:

ABA President Linda Klein is expressing serious concern about standards that permit searches of lawyer laptops and other electronic devices at the border in the absence of reasonable suspicion.

In a May 5 letter (PDF) to the Department of Homeland Security, Klein seeks policies and procedures to ensure the confidentiality of privileged or confidential client material on the devices. A summary is here.

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on ABAJ: ABA expresses concern about border searches of lawyer laptops and other electronic devices

CA6: Tossing gun to avoid police is abandonment

Defendant voluntarily answered questions, but he tossed his gun, and that’s an abandonment. United States v. Matthews, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8292 (6th Cir. May 8, 2017).

Two lane changes were reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop that led to finding defendant was under the influence. State v. Terry, 2017-Ohio-2686, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 1692 (2d Dist. May 5, 2017).*

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Tossing gun to avoid police is abandonment

BNA: Can You Hear Them Now? Robbers Ask SCOTUS for Phone Privacy

BNA: Can You Hear Them Now? Robbers Ask SCOTUS for Phone Privacy by Jordan S. Rubin:
From Criminal Law Reporter
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, SCOTUS | Comments Off on BNA: Can You Hear Them Now? Robbers Ask SCOTUS for Phone Privacy

We were hacked (again). Nobody is safe

You probably noticed that the site didn’t work for a good part of yesterday. It’s been hacked before, and the server owner we contract it to took their sweet time undoing this one. The password has been changed twice, but I think it was something left behind on a prior hack because of phishing emails originating from it.

You’d think a professional server firm would have better security. I can say this because they have too many websites to care what I say or care whether I stay with them. Note of caution: I’ve heard that this could be a WordPress security issue since closed. We’re trying to prevent this BS from happening again.

Nobody is safe these days except Apple, Microsoft, and eBay which invest tens of millions in security. The latter contracts space on its server to the CIA, or so Bezos admitted in a 60 minutes interview years ago.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on We were hacked (again). Nobody is safe

D.Ariz.: Trailer on blocks with no means around to pull it not subject to automobile exception

An RV trailer elevated on a block with nothing to pull it around is not subject to the automobile exception. United States v. Maley, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69797 (D.Ariz. May 5, 2017).

A detailed tip about defendant on supervised release for failing to register as a sex offender after a child pornography conviction provided reasonable suspicion for his PO to seize his computer for possible CP. Defendant denied knowing the password [which would suggest lack of standing in the computer, but this is not developed], and the PO found it was not password protected. There was child pornography on the computer. Release revoked. United States v. Goguen, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68740 (D.Me. May 5, 2017).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Trailer on blocks with no means around to pull it not subject to automobile exception

CA2: Unlicensed driver of rental car rented by another had no standing in car

The court does not have to decide whether the unauthorized driver of a rental car as to the rental contract has standing, despite being loaned the car by the renter, noting differing authorities; because defendant was also an unlicensed driver he gets no standing because driving the car was unlawful. “Lyle should not have been driving any car because his license was suspended, and a rental company with knowledge of the relevant facts certainly would not have given him permission to drive its car nor allowed a renter to do so. Under these circumstances, Lyle did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the rental car.” United States v. Lyle, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8193 (2d Cir. May 9, 2017).

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA2: Unlicensed driver of rental car rented by another had no standing in car

M.D.Ala.: A “level III inspection” of a tractor trailer by the Motor Carrier Safety Unit of the Alabama State Police was valid and led to RS then PC

A “level III inspection” of a tractor trailer by the Motor Carrier Safety Unit of the Alabama State Police led to looking at the load and seeing that something was wrong, and that led to finding marijuana. The stop and inspection were both valid. The opening of the truck led to reasonable suspicion. United States v. Cruz, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68186 (M.D. April 17, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67267 (M.D. Ala. May 3, 2017).

Defendant’s hesitation before consenting to the entry into his house indicates that he knew he had the right to refuse and elected not to. The totality shows that the consent to search his person and the house once inside was also voluntary. United States v. Doss, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68175 (W.D.Ky. May 4, 2017).*

Posted in Administrative search, Consent | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: A “level III inspection” of a tractor trailer by the Motor Carrier Safety Unit of the Alabama State Police was valid and led to RS then PC

D.S.C.: Motorcycle owner’s GPS tracked to def’s backyard; no Franks violation in the SW affidavit because it was really backyard

The owner of a motorcycle had a GPS tracker on it, and he reported to the police that it was pinging at defendant’s address. Defendant’s claim that the affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s address violated Franks because the affidavit didn’t say it was the backyard is rejected. United States v. Galloway, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67993 (D.S.C. May 4, 2017).

Defendant was stopped after midnight. His nervousness made the officer order him out of the car. A patdown led to a wad of cash, yet defendant insisted he was unemployed. There was reasonable suspicion developing that turned into probable cause. United States v. Boyd, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68807 (E.D. Mich. May 5, 2017).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Motorcycle owner’s GPS tracked to def’s backyard; no Franks violation in the SW affidavit because it was really backyard

D.Minn. USMJ finds Playpen warrant constitutionally defective and no GFE

“Accordingly, the NIT warrant is void ab initio. Without an identifiable warrant exception (the Government offers none and the Court is aware of none) the Court concludes that the NIT warrant’s violation of Rule 41(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(a) constitutes a constitutional infirmity See Hyten, 5 F.3d at 1157. … In short, the Court concludes that the issuance of the NIT warrant in violation of Rule 41(b) was of constitutional magnitude, prejudiced Carlson, and was done in reckless disregard of proper procedure.” The good faith exception also does not apply. United States v. Carlson, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67991 (D. Minn. March 23, 2017) (R&R).

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Minn. USMJ finds Playpen warrant constitutionally defective and no GFE

EFF: The Fight Against General Warrants to Hack Rages On

EFF: The Fight Against General Warrants to Hack Rages On by Kate Tummarllo:

The federal government thinks it should be able to use one warrant to hack into an untold number of computers located anywhere in the world. But EFF and others continue to make the case that the Fourth Amendment prohibits this type of blanket warrant. And courts are starting to listen.

Last week, EFF pressed its case against these broad and unconstitutional warrants in arguments before a federal court of appeals in Boston, Massachusetts. As we spelled out in a brief filed earlier this year, these warrants fail to satisfy the Fourth Amendment’s basic safeguards.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on EFF: The Fight Against General Warrants to Hack Rages On

E.D.Pa.: Gun on person was in plain view during struggle with officer

The gun on defendant’s person was in plain view during the defendant’s struggle with the officer. United States v. Cann, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68028 (E.D. Pa. May 3, 2017).*

A witness claimed defendant was viewing child pornography on his computer in the past. Coupled with a current allegation of sexual abuse on an 11 year old, there was probable cause to search the laptop in his vehicle. United States v. Haas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67178 (E.D. Va. May 2, 2017).*

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Gun on person was in plain view during struggle with officer

D.Utah: No 4A requirement for a police car in the field to have internet access to more speedily check records without radioing it in

There is no constitutional requirement for a police car in the field to have internet access to more speedily check records without radioing it in. Also, he testified that rural service is spotty. United States v. Lopez-Casillas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67787 (D. Utah May 3, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Utah: No 4A requirement for a police car in the field to have internet access to more speedily check records without radioing it in

MA: Porch and side yard of multifamily dwelling was protected curtilage

The porch and side yard of a multifamily residence was within the curtilage for Dunn and Jardines, so the police entry to look under the porch was unreasonable and the search is suppressed. Commonwealth v. Leslie, 2017 Mass. LEXIS 341 (May 9, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on MA: Porch and side yard of multifamily dwelling was protected curtilage