CO: In this recreational MJ use state, a dog sniff is a “search,” and a positive alert isn’t PC a crime is occurring

Use of a drug dog on a car is a “search” in marijuana recreational use Colorado, and a dog alert which could be of either legal or illegal substances is not probable cause. People v. McKnight, 2017 COA 93, 2017 Colo. App. LEXIS 879 (July 13, 2017) (divided opinion):
Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Search, State constitution | Comments Off on CO: In this recreational MJ use state, a dog sniff is a “search,” and a positive alert isn’t PC a crime is occurring

CA2: Waiting until trial to move to suppress computer was waiver

The FBI thought they had defendant’s wife’s consent to search his computer, but they realized she didn’t know the password, so they applied for a search warrant. Defendant waited until the start of the trial to move to suppress, and that was waiver. He would also lose on the merits of the search. United States v. Nayyar, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12677 (2d Cir. July 12, 2017).

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA2: Waiting until trial to move to suppress computer was waiver

CA7: Def’s wife of 21 years had apparent authority to consent to search of garage even if she didn’t regularly use it

Defendant’s wife of 21 years, 10 years at the co-owned property, had apparent authority to consent to its search. The fact she didn’t regularly go into the detached garage didn’t at all mean she didn’t have apparent authority. United States v. Mojica, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12662 (7th Cir. July 14, 2017).

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on CA7: Def’s wife of 21 years had apparent authority to consent to search of garage even if she didn’t regularly use it

TN: Def was brought before magistrate 47¼ hours after his arrest; no Riverside violation and it wouldn’t ripen to a Gerstein violation

Defendant was brought before a magistrate 47¼ hours after his arrest and arraigned at 3:15 am, and this was presumptively reasonable. His interrogation after he was released from the hospital after arrest but before arraignment complied with Miranda, and nothing “ripened” into a Gerstein violation. State v. Long, 2017 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 609 (July 11, 2017).

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress seizure of a stolen laptop from defendant’s backpack when defendant disclaimed ownership when confronted with it. Abernathy v. State, 2017 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 602 (July 10, 2017).*

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonableness | Comments Off on TN: Def was brought before magistrate 47¼ hours after his arrest; no Riverside violation and it wouldn’t ripen to a Gerstein violation

OR: Evidence of refusal of a breath test doesn’t violate state constitution on self-incrimination or search

Because refusal of consent is a statutory rather than a constitutional issue, “the state’s use of evidence of defendant’s refusal to consent to a breath test at trial did not violate defendant’s right against compelled self-incrimination under Article I, section 12, or his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under Article I, section 9.” State v. Banks, 286 Ore. App. 718, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 879 (July 12, 2017).

Officers responding to an assault call came upon a camper at a residence to talk to the occupant about the call and the door was slammed in their face. They could smell methamphetamine at the front door. Going around to the back door for security didn’t matter, and it wasn’t raised in the trial court. State v. Dobbins, 2017 S.C. App. LEXIS 56 (July 12, 2017).*

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OR: Evidence of refusal of a breath test doesn’t violate state constitution on self-incrimination or search

DE: Nervousness, criminal history, use of a rental vehicle, and high crime area not RS

“Delaware Courts have held that nervousness, criminal history, and use of a rental vehicle are not supportive of reasonable suspicion unless used in conjunction with ‘more tangible, objectively articulable indicators of criminality.’” Being in a high crime area also wasn’t enough. Motion to suppress granted. State v. Bordley, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 338 (July 11, 2017).*

Hitting the fog line and rumble strips was enough for a stop since the vehicle appeared to be wandering in its lane. The “overwhelming” smell of marijuana was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Portis, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107382 (N.D. Ala. July 12, 2017).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Nervousness, criminal history, use of a rental vehicle, and high crime area not RS

Motherboard: Liberty Might Be Better Served by Doing Away with Privacy

Motherboard: Liberty Might Be Better Served by Doing Away with Privacy by Zoltan Istvan:

If tech is surveilling us constantly, we need the ability to use it to watch the watchers. [Zoltan Istvan is a futurist, transhumanist, author of The Transhumanist Wager, and a Libertarian candidate for California Governor.]
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Motherboard: Liberty Might Be Better Served by Doing Away with Privacy

N.D.Miss.: Heck bar doesn’t apply to search preceding arrest, but action stayed pending criminal case

Plaintiffs’ claim for illegal search and seizure at an internet café resulting in a criminal prosecution is not barred by Heck. The action is stayed, however, pending the outcome of the plaintiffs’ criminal trial. Moore v. Miss. Gaming Comm’n, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107464 (N.D. Miss. July 12, 2017)

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Heck bar doesn’t apply to search preceding arrest, but action stayed pending criminal case

D.N.J.: Google has to produce emails stored overseas

Google responds to subpoenas and search warrants for email accounts from its California headquarters. The fact that the actual data may be stored in a server in another country doesn’t matter–Google still has to produce. In re Search Warrant to Google, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108342 (D. N.J. July 10, 2017).

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Google has to produce emails stored overseas

NE: Driver’s refusal to get out of car can be offense of refusal to obey lawful order

Because an officer can order a vehicle occupant out of a car under the Fourth Amendment (here because he couldn’t hear the driver because of a nearby ambulance), the occupant can be convicted of failure to obey a lawful order. State v. Campbell, 24 Neb. App. 861, 2017 Neb. App. LEXIS 145 (July 11, 2017).

“Brown gave Stallings verbal permission to search the vehicle, which was later memorialized in a written statement that Brown signed. Brown was not in custody at the time of the search, and he cooperated fully with the investigating officer, Eric Stallings, throughout the encounter. For instance, Brown indicated that paperwork for the car was in the glovebox, popped the trunk for Stallings without prompting, and examined some of the items in the trunk with Stallings. Such actions go beyond mere acquiescence to Stallings’s claim of lawful authority. The record reflects a conversational encounter that was free from threats, abuse, or other coercive techniques.” United States v. Brown, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12289 (11th Cir. July 10, 2017).*

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on NE: Driver’s refusal to get out of car can be offense of refusal to obey lawful order

NJ rejects a RS requirement for all vehicle dog sniffs

New Jersey adopts the Fourth Amendment standard of Rodriguez, and reasonable suspicion is not required for a dog sniff of a car unless the stop is prolonged for the sniff beyond the mission of the stop. State v. Dunbar, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 747 (July 10, 2017).

Defendant’s stop was justified by his walking down the center of the street instead of on the sidewalk. When police approached him, he tried to evade them, and one thing led to another and reasonable suspicion for a frisk was present. United States v. Houston, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106702 (E.D. Mich. July 11, 2017).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ rejects a RS requirement for all vehicle dog sniffs

TX13: Untested hospital drawn blood sample has to be obtained by SW not subpoena

Defendant was in a car wreck and hospitalized. The other person in the wreck died. At the hospital, he was treated and released, but blood was drawn for medical purposes but never analyzed by the hospital. The officer obtained a grand jury subpoena for the blood to get it tested. The trial court suppressed for lack of a search warrant, and the court of appeals affirmed. Defendant retained a reasonable expectation of privacy in the untested blood. This is different than subpoenaing the records of blood testing after it was done. State v. Martinez, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 6491 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi – Edinburg July 13, 2017).

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX13: Untested hospital drawn blood sample has to be obtained by SW not subpoena

ABAJ: Orlando cops pull over black state attorney, and the video goes viral

ABAJ: Orlando cops pull over black state attorney, and the video goes viral by Debra Cassens Weiss:

Body cam video of Orlando police officers pulling over Florida’s only black state attorney has gone viral after some commentators suggested the stop could have been due to racial profiling.

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on ABAJ: Orlando cops pull over black state attorney, and the video goes viral

CNET: US Border Patrol says it won’t search travelers’ cloud data

CNET: US Border Patrol says it won’t search travelers’ cloud data by Steven Musil
Clarification came in response to the senator’s questions about border agents pressuring Americans into providing device credentials.

Endgadget: US Customs can search phones but not data stored in the cloud by Mariella Moon
Border officials apparently can’t plunder data stored exclusively on remote servers.

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on CNET: US Border Patrol says it won’t search travelers’ cloud data

CA8: Protective sweep justified by one’s furtiveness, gun history for def, sounds of others inside

Here, there was plenty of articulable facts that added up to reasonable suspicion for a protective sweep because of one person’s apparent furtiveness, a gun history for the arrestee, and the sounds of others inside. United States v. Alatorre, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12409 (8th Cir. July 12, 2017) [in my view, the default is that others inside is almost always enough, but the gun history cinches it]:
Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA8: Protective sweep justified by one’s furtiveness, gun history for def, sounds of others inside

N.D.Tex.: SW for apartment didn’t extend to vehicle

Search warrant for defendant’s apartment didn’t extend to his vehicle, which the government concedes. The warrantless search of the vehicle along with the apartment exceeded the warrant, and the vehicle search is suppressed. United States v. Salinas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106432 (N.D. Tex. July 11, 2017).

Defendant’s 2255 ineffective assistance of counsel claim is wholly meritless, so defense counsel can’t be ineffective. United States v. Lassend, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106879 (D. Mass. July 11, 2017)*

Defendant’s 2255 claim was a different approach to the search and seizure claim already litigated and lost, so it’s denied. Wall v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106738 (D. Del. July 11, 2017).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: SW for apartment didn’t extend to vehicle

NY Times: When You Should (and Shouldn’t) Share Your Location Using a Smartphone

NY Times: When You Should (and Shouldn’t) Share Your Location Using a Smartphone by Brian X. Chen:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NY Times: When You Should (and Shouldn’t) Share Your Location Using a Smartphone

ars technica: FBI didn’t need warrant for stingray in attempted murder case, DOJ says

ars technica: FBI didn’t need warrant for stingray in attempted murder case, DOJ says by Cyrus Farivar
Prosecutors: “signals emitted from a phone are… not by their nature private.”

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on ars technica: FBI didn’t need warrant for stingray in attempted murder case, DOJ says

CA5: Ptf doesn’t show that city’s alleged failure to use SWAT teams “threat matrix” properly led to any constitutional violation

Plaintiff failed to show a pattern of unconstitutional actions or that the SWAT teams’ use of a “threat matrix” to determine when they would be called out was unconstitutional. Plaintiff doesn’t show that the failure to implement that matrix properly led to any constitutional violation. He’s amended four times and still hasn’t stated a claim. Quinn v. Guerrero, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12290 (5th Cir. July 10, 2017).

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf doesn’t show that city’s alleged failure to use SWAT teams “threat matrix” properly led to any constitutional violation

Cal.1: Inventory of duffle bag at booking was reasonable

Defendant refused to leave a 24 hour restaurant after being asked several times, and the police were called. Finally, defendant was arrested and taken into custody. His duffle bag was inventoried at the police station and a .38 revolver and ammunition were in it. The inventory of the duffle bag was reasonable. People v. Turner, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 611 (1st Dist. July 10, 2017).*

Defendant was convicted of disposing of a firearm for a convicted felon, her son. She claimed the search warrant for her house was based on her coerced statements because she was told to tell the officers the truth or that would be a separate offense. That’s not unlawful coercion. The affidavit otherwise showed probable cause for the search warrant. United States v. McNeal, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12269 (10th Cir. July 10, 2017).*

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on Cal.1: Inventory of duffle bag at booking was reasonable