E.D.N.C.: Where probation search didn’t comply with state RS requirement, federal court suppresses it

The state probation search of defendant’s premises did not comply with the state statute requiring reasonable suspicion, so the court does not consider the constitutionality of the search. The search was not for supervision purposes because his supervising officer did not receive any tip that defendant was in violation of probation and there was no particularized reason to search his residence other than his prior record and gang validation. United States v. Clark, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113197 (E.D. N.C. June 20, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112774 (E.D. N.C. July 20, 2017).

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Where probation search didn’t comply with state RS requirement, federal court suppresses it

DE: Driving on wrong side of road, smell of alcohol, refusing breath test, failing FST adds up to PC

There was probable cause for taking defendant’s blood from driving on the wrong side of the highway, smelling of alcohol, refusing a breath test, and failing an FST. State v. Dopirak, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 358 (July 24, 2017).

“Dearry has not presented any basis on which Trial Counsel might have challenged such a search warrant. The fact that neither Dearry, nor the Residence’s owner, were implicated in the racketeering investigation does not call into question the officers’ probable cause to search the Residence, including Dearry’s room.” State v. Dearry, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 357 (July 21, 2017).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: Driving on wrong side of road, smell of alcohol, refusing breath test, failing FST adds up to PC

E.D.N.C.: DL checkpoint stopping all cars was reasonable

Defendant was stopped at a driver’s license checkpoint where all cars were stopped. The court finds the checkpoint constitutional. Defendant then consented to the search of his car. United States v. Moore, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116012 (E.D. N.C. May 18, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115453 (E.D.N.C. July 25, 2017).

The officer had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant during the traffic stop that defendant was trafficking drugs when defendant appeared overly nervous, the vehicle belonged to an absent third party, defendant said he was returning from Philadelphia, a source location for narcotics, a records check showed a lengthy criminal history for assault and drug offenses, and the officer remembered prior contact with defendant and with the same vehicle that had yielded drugs and a hypodermic needle. That reasonable suspicion permitted bringing a drug dog to the scene. Commonwealth v. Green, 2017 PA Super 244, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 571 (July 25, 2017).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Roadblocks | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: DL checkpoint stopping all cars was reasonable

FL3: Tossing object in flight from car after stop was abandonment

The officer encountered defendant passenger sitting in a car in a no parking zone and directed him out of the car because of a fear of weapons. Defendant got out and ran, discarding an object as he ran. That was abandonment after a lawful stop. Lopez v. State, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10657 (Fla. 3d DCA July 26, 2017).*

Defendant’s actions showed he impliedly consented to a search of his house by allowing officers in and not objecting. The gun seen was in plain view. United States v. Koh, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13324 (9th Cir. July 24, 2017).*

Posted in Abandonment, Consent | Comments Off on FL3: Tossing object in flight from car after stop was abandonment

WaPo: 10th Circuit grants narrow victory to family raided by a SWAT team over loose leaf tea

WaPo: 10th Circuit grants narrow victory to family raided by a SWAT team over loose leaf tea by Radley Balko. The case is Harte v. Bd. of Commissioners, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13399 (10th Cir. July 25, 2017), over a raid because loose tea found in a trash pull with a false positive field test (which can happen 70% of the time) combined with a visit to a hydroponic store that made the police suspicious. It cost them $25,000 just to litigate getting the affidavit for the search warrant, which should have been a public record.

I can’t summarize this better than Mr. Balko:
Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on WaPo: 10th Circuit grants narrow victory to family raided by a SWAT team over loose leaf tea

PA: Conflict of laws: PA law applies as site of crime even though blood draw in NY

Defendant had a DUI accident in Pennsylvania and his blood was drawn at an ER in New York for medical purposes. New York law would exclude the evidence, but Pennsylvania law would not because the doctor-patient privilege doesn’t apply in criminal cases in Pennsylvania. Applying conflict of laws principles, Pennsylvania law should apply in Pennsylvania. Commonwealth v. Grays, 2017 PA Super 245, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 572 (July 25, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on PA: Conflict of laws: PA law applies as site of crime even though blood draw in NY

Law.com: Roberts Is Uneasy About Invasive Police Devices, Gorsuch Has His Back

Law.com: Roberts Is Uneasy About Invasive Police Devices, Gorsuch Has His Back by Marsha Coyle:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Law.com: Roberts Is Uneasy About Invasive Police Devices, Gorsuch Has His Back

NJ: Waiting for a SW isn’t exigency to enter a home, but that wasn’t clearly established in 2008 for § 1983 purposes

In 2008, officers entered and seized plaintiff’s home while waiting for a search warrant. In a § 1983 and N.J. Civil Rights Act case, it was not clearly established at the time that that was unreasonable. He gets qualified immunity, but henceforth that’s not exigency. Brown v. State, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 805 (July 24, 2017). From the court’s syllabus:
Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NJ: Waiting for a SW isn’t exigency to enter a home, but that wasn’t clearly established in 2008 for § 1983 purposes

UPI: Mississippi police kill man while serving warrant at wrong house

UPI: Mississippi police kill man while serving warrant at wrong house by Ray Downs:

Close to midnight on Sunday, Southaven, Miss., police arrived at the wrong house to serve an arrest warrant and shot a man dead in his own home, according to reports.

WaPo: Police shot and killed a man while trying to serve a warrant — at the wrong house by Cleve R. Wootson Jr.

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on UPI: Mississippi police kill man while serving warrant at wrong house

S.D.Ohio: Def’s companion’s frisk showed def he was next, so he was seized, but it was with RS

The frisk of defendant’s companion indicated to him that he was seized, too, and that he’d be frisked before he fled and discarded the gun. Still, there was reasonable suspicion for the seizure, and the motion to suppress the gun is denied. United States v. Ward, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113425 (S.D. Ohio July 20, 2017).

Miranda isn’t a Fourth Amendment claim, so that 2255 claim’s rejected. Gregory v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114449 (D. Idaho July 21, 2017).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Def’s companion’s frisk showed def he was next, so he was seized, but it was with RS

E.D.Ky.: LPN scanner produced warrant for car owner, but driver was wrong gender; with other people in car, officer can assume owner in car

When a license plate scanner alerts on a car that the registered owner has a warrant and the driver is not the same gender as the owner, the officer can assume, for reasonableness or reasonable suspicion purposes, that one of the other occupants in the car is the registered owner. United States v. Whitis, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112923 (E.D. Ky. July 20, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: LPN scanner produced warrant for car owner, but driver was wrong gender; with other people in car, officer can assume owner in car

D.Colo.: Full body scan of ADX SHU inmates are reasonable

Submitting Florence ADX SHU inmates to repeated x-ray like body scans inside the prison is not unreasonable. Probable cause is not required since it’s not that invasive. Defendant promised proof they could be harmful, but it wasn’t produced. United States v. Shields, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113132 (D. Colo. July 20, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Full body scan of ADX SHU inmates are reasonable

D.C.Cir.: Def’s driving car to where it was stopped and searched was “mobile” for automobile exception

Defendant’s car was subject to the automobile exception: probable cause “abounded” at the time of the search and it was mobile because it was driven to the place where it was stopped and searched. Weapons used in a robbery were believed to be in the car. United States v. Eshetu, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13345 (D.C. Cir. July 25, 2017).

Defendant was stopped for suspicion of DUI on Ft. Benning. There was probable cause to get him out for an FST. United States v. Hardie, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113509 (M.D.Ga. July 21, 2017).*

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Def’s driving car to where it was stopped and searched was “mobile” for automobile exception

CA10: Def didn’t submit to police authority until after his furtive movements under the car seat

Police officers pulled into a bar’s parking lot from different directions looking for criminal activity. When they pulled up behind him, defendant did not submit to police authority until after his furtive movements under the seat, where a gun was ultimately found. United States v. Roberson, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13397 (10th Cir. July 25, 2017) (1+1-1):
Continue reading →

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA10: Def didn’t submit to police authority until after his furtive movements under the car seat

AP: Chief Justice Roberts: Technology poses challenge for court

AP: Chief Justice Roberts: Technology poses challenge for court:
Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on AP: Chief Justice Roberts: Technology poses challenge for court

CA8 upholds Playpen warrant strictly on GFE despite Rule 41 violation

Playpen warrant upheld purely on good faith exception of Davis and Herring. Rule 41 was violated, but the court finds the costs of exclusion outweight deterrence, particularly where the rule was modified to permit such later warrants. United States v. Horton, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13333 (8th Cir. July 24, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8 upholds Playpen warrant strictly on GFE despite Rule 41 violation

CA10: Where one in car flashed gun in a bar, it was reasonable to order occupants to ground when stopped

Defendant was seen flashing a gun in a bar in Colorado, and police got a specific description including hair braids and dress from the wait staff. When the car was seen, officers ordered the occupants out and to the ground with their legs crossed. Under the facts known to the officers, this use of force was objectively reasonable. United States v. Windom, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13313 (10th Cir. July 24, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA10: Where one in car flashed gun in a bar, it was reasonable to order occupants to ground when stopped

CA9: § 1983 Franks violation: Ignoring alleged false statements still leaves PC

A search warrant was issued for alleged violations of the building code. Ignoring any alleged false statements that led to issuance of the search warrant, there still was probable cause. Gunnels v. Kenny, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13204 (6th Cir. July 20, 2017).

There were factual disputes underlying the probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest, and the district court erred in granting summary judgment for the defendants. Reed v. Lieurance, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13272 (9th Cir. July 24, 2017).

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: § 1983 Franks violation: Ignoring alleged false statements still leaves PC

OR: Emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress

The emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress. Here it was cattle. State v. Hershey, 286 Ore. App. 824, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 907 (July 19, 2017).

There was plenty of probable cause, but defendant’s Franks argument that the officer couldn’t have seen what he said he saw is rejected because of defendant’s admissions that there was at least some ways to see. United States v. Colón-Rosario, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113222 (D.P.R. July 17, 2017).*

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress

NE: Reach under seat during traffic stop was RS

The officer suspected that a wanted person was in the car defendant was in and stopped it. As he approached the car, the driver reached under the seat. The wanted person wasn’t found, but there was reasonable suspicion from the furtive movement of the driver reaching under the seat. State v. Rogers, 297 Neb. 265, 2017 Neb. LEXIS 112 (July 21, 2017).

Plaintiffs were in a truck hauling scrap metal, and they were snitched off as carrying marijuana. After the truck was stopped for the truck being overweight, a drug dog was brought in which alerted. The truck was searched, and bales of aluminum cans were scattered all over to facilitate the search, but nothing was found. It was moved to a truck service company for further search of the truck and load, and still nothing was found. Plaintiffs state enough to go forward in the face of a summary judgment motion on the factual basis for the stop. At no point could the defense muster a fact showing an objective belief the truck was overweight. Carter v. Hamaoui, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13231 (6th Cir. July 20, 2017).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: Reach under seat during traffic stop was RS