S.D.Ohio: Def’s companion’s frisk showed def he was next, so he was seized, but it was with RS

The frisk of defendant’s companion indicated to him that he was seized, too, and that he’d be frisked before he fled and discarded the gun. Still, there was reasonable suspicion for the seizure, and the motion to suppress the gun is denied. United States v. Ward, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113425 (S.D. Ohio July 20, 2017).

Miranda isn’t a Fourth Amendment claim, so that 2255 claim’s rejected. Gregory v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114449 (D. Idaho July 21, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.