Electronics 360: Smart Devices Versus Privacy

Electronics 360: Smart Devices Versus Privacy by Tony Pallone:
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Electronics 360: Smart Devices Versus Privacy

CA3: CI’s conversations with def and officer’s observations was PC

CI’s conversations with the defendant coupled with the officer’s observations was probable cause. United States v. Ray, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15827 (3d Cir. Aug. 21, 2017).*

Defendant’s stop wasn’t prolonged at the point he was asked whether he had anything the officer “should know about,” and defendant finally admitted he had a gun. United States v. Bishop, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134934 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 23, 2017).*

Through Craigslist postings, defendant said he was into incest and surreptitious recordings of naked children. Police investigated and found outstanding warrants for him. They arranged a meet and arrested him. There was probable cause for search of his computers, and the good faith exception would apply in any event. United States v. Rogers, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133285 (E.D. Mo. July 19, 2017).*

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: CI’s conversations with def and officer’s observations was PC

AK: Trooper’s call to PO about what he’d seen justified PO having trooper do probation search

The Alaska State Trooper called defendant’s probation officer and “told the probation officer that Bradford had needle marks on his arm, that Bradford had confessed to recent use of heroin, and that he was driving without a license. Therefore, the probation officer had valid reasons to be concerned that Bradford was violating several conditions of probation. Trooper Miner provided Probation Officer Clausson with sufficient facts and circumstances to enable Officer Clausson to exercise independent discretion and request the search for valid probation supervision purposes.” The probation search by the State Trooper was thus valid. Bradford v. State, 2017 Alas. App. LEXIS 146 (Aug. 23, 2017)* (unpublished).

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on AK: Trooper’s call to PO about what he’d seen justified PO having trooper do probation search

DE: Def doesn’t have to be named as a suspect for a SW to be valid because it’s a search for things which could be evidence

“It is Defendant’s burden to prove the warrant is unsupported by probable cause. Defendant has not met this burden. The search warrant was issued solely for the vehicle. Whether Defendant was a suspect at the time of the application for the search warrant is immaterial to an analysis of the probable cause in the warrant as to the vehicle.” The warrant was for ballistic evidence of a shooting. State v. Simpson, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 410 (Aug. 21, 2017).

The district court’s partial grant of suppression of the search of defendant’s car not being voluntary is affirmed. The officer never asked for consent, and defendant was merely going along. The officer told another officer that defendant had consented, but he hadn’t. United States v. Walker, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16140 (5th Cir. Aug. 23, 2017).*

Posted in Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on DE: Def doesn’t have to be named as a suspect for a SW to be valid because it’s a search for things which could be evidence

The ‘Smart’ Fourth Amendment, 102 Cornell L. Rev. 547 (2017)

The ‘Smart’ Fourth Amendment, 102 Cornell L. Rev. 547 (2017) by Andrew Guthrie Ferguson. Abstract:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The ‘Smart’ Fourth Amendment, 102 Cornell L. Rev. 547 (2017)

C.D.Cal.: Under collective knowledge doctrine, the officer making the stop doesn’t need to know the PC

There was probable cause from collective knowledge for defendant’s stop and the search of his vehicle for a hidden compartment with drugs, even though the stopping officer didn’t know what it was. United States v. Isshpunani, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135301 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2017).

Probable cause was shown for the search warrant for defendant’s property for evidence of sexual battery and sex trafficking, that he had a minor victim with him “without privilege to do so.” United States v. Zyn Ho, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135658 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 24, 2017).*

Defendant’s attorney couldn’t be ineffective for not pursuing the Fourth Amendment claim that his stop was invalid when it clearly was. He fled from a stop, and that was additional reasonable suspicion. Boatley v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189224 (S.D. Fla. May 2, 2016).*

Posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Under collective knowledge doctrine, the officer making the stop doesn’t need to know the PC

We already know the Executive Branch doesn’t respect the Fourth Amendment, but …

A serial violator of the Fourth Amendment is called a “great American patriot” by a President who recently encouraged police to use excessive force. And the SCOTUS hates the exclusionary rule, and Congress won’t update any privacy laws.

Who will stand up besides the criminal defense bar? See NACDL’s Press Release today.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on We already know the Executive Branch doesn’t respect the Fourth Amendment, but …

Oxford Univ. Press: How private are your prescription records?

Oxford Univ. Press: How private are your prescription records? by Leslie Francis and John Francis:
Continue reading →

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Oxford Univ. Press: How private are your prescription records?

ME: Officer’s crossing city limits in pursuit, even if a violation of statute, didn’t violate 4A

Even if the officer violated state law on his territorial jurisdiction, following defendant across the city limits into another town to make a traffic stop didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment and there is no reason to apply the exclusionary rule. State v. Turner, 2017 ME 185, 2017 Me. LEXIS 202 (Aug. 22, 2017, rev. Dec. 7. 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on ME: Officer’s crossing city limits in pursuit, even if a violation of statute, didn’t violate 4A

Law.com: What the DreamHost/DOJ Battle Says About Search Warrants in the Digital Age

Law.com: What the DreamHost/DOJ Battle Says About Search Warrants in the Digital Age by Rhys Dipshan:
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Law.com: What the DreamHost/DOJ Battle Says About Search Warrants in the Digital Age

OH10: Extraterritorial arrest didn’t violate state statute

Defendant’s extraterritorial arrest within the state did not violate state law. Remanded and the state constitutional question can be raised again. State v. Roby, 2017-Ohio-7331, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 3622 (10th Dist. Aug. 24, 2017).

“In this case, Mincey does not challenge the initial traffic stop, he challenges only the duration of the stop, and we can find no constitutional error in its duration. From the moment Deputy Bruce initiated the traffic stop, Mincey acted in ways that distinguished himself from the average traveler.” United States v. Mincey, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15809 (11th Cir. Aug. 21, 2017).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Extraterritorial arrest didn’t violate state statute

Forbes: What The Fight Between DreamHost And The DOJ Means For Technology And Freedom

Forbes: What The Fight Between DreamHost And The DOJ Means For Technology And Freedom by Frank Miniter:
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Forbes: What The Fight Between DreamHost And The DOJ Means For Technology And Freedom

NY Times: DreamHost Ordered to Release Some Trump Protest Website Data to U.S.

NY Times: DreamHost Ordered to Release Some Trump Protest Website Data to U.S. by Tiffany Hsu

A Superior Court judge in Washington on Thursday ordered the web hosting company DreamHost to turn over data associated with a Trump protest website to federal prosecutors – but not as much as the Justice Department had originally sought.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on NY Times: DreamHost Ordered to Release Some Trump Protest Website Data to U.S.

The Hill: Verizon reports spike in government requests for cell ‘tower dumps’

The Hill: Verizon reports spike in government requests for cell ‘tower dumps’ by Katie Bo Williams

Government requests for the mass disclosure of every caller who connected to a particular cellphone tower have spiked during the first half of 2017, according to Verizon’s latest transparency report.

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on The Hill: Verizon reports spike in government requests for cell ‘tower dumps’

CA10: Criminal history questions during a traffic stop reveal no more than the computer check would and aren’t unreasonable

It wasn’t unreasonable for the officer to ask criminal history questions during a traffic stop because the computer check would reveal the same information. Travel plan questions didn’t extend the stop, and defendant’s gun was seen when he got out of the vehicle. “If running a computer check of a driver’s criminal history is justifiable as a ‘negligibly burdensome’ inquiry useful for officer safety, we fail to see how asking the driver about that history could be unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. The information requested by Maher did not exceed the scope of what a computer check would reveal. A driver’s answer may not be as reliable as a computer check but the time involved is much shorter. And just ‘allowing the officer to ask the question may provide important clues pertaining to safety,’ such as nervous or evasive responses.” United States v. Cone, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16170 (10th Cir. Aug. 24, 2017).

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Criminal history questions during a traffic stop reveal no more than the computer check would and aren’t unreasonable

PA: Random suspicionless stops of boats on inland waters for safety inspection is unreasonable

Surveying apparently all the cases and statutes, Pennsylvania decides that random suspicionless stops of boats violate both the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. The court distinguishes stops on the open seas upheld in United States v. Villa monte-Marquez. “Thus, even where there is a clearly established legitimate government interest, and suspicionless searches are a proven means of promoting that interest, there are still safeguards that must be put in place in order for a stop or search to pass constitutional muster. We see no need to depart from this framework when considering suspicionless searches of Pennsylvania’s waterways. The Commonwealth has not demonstrated that it is unable to set up a system of inspection similar to what is done on roadways, and consistent with other states. Accordingly, we hold that the random, suspicionless stop of Appellant’s boat to conduct a safety inspection violates the Fourth Amendment and Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.” Commonwealth v. Karash, 2017 PA Super 271, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 639 (Aug. 21, 2017) (separate opinion concurring and dissenting).

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Roadblocks | Comments Off on PA: Random suspicionless stops of boats on inland waters for safety inspection is unreasonable

N.D.Tex.: Def was arrested in a prostitution sting and his car was on a parking lot; govt fails to show impoundment proper

Defendant was arrested in a prostitution sting, and his car was impounded and searched. The court suppresses the search under the community caretaking function for not following the rules of the department. The government has the burden on a warrantless search, and it failed here. The car was on a parking lot, and it was in nobody’s way. United States v. Haynes, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133618 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2017).

The parties base the motion to suppress solely on the police reports, and it’s denied. “But Cuevas’s focus on duration-of-the-stop cases is misguided. Cuevas has not challenged the duration of the stop prior to Trooper Russell seeking consent and, in any event, that period was reasonable. Trooper Russell’s discussion with Cuevas, up to this point, was not unduly prolonged and Trooper Russell requested permission to search the car before he had even checked Cuevas’s license and registration, clearly a task essential to the issuance of a warning or ticket.” United States v. Cuevas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131411 (D. Mass. Aug. 17, 2017).*

Posted in Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Def was arrested in a prostitution sting and his car was on a parking lot; govt fails to show impoundment proper

WI: Eight prior OWIs and failing FST is reasonable suspicion

Defendant’s eight prior OWI convictions and being on extended supervision and failing a FST was reasonable suspicion. State v. Wortman, 2017 Wisc. App. LEXIS 622 (Aug. 23, 2017).

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress his stop and later search and seizure. The vehicle had expired tags and defendant fled the vehicle when it was stopped. In flight he tossed a gun. Boatley v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189224 (S.D. Fla. May 2, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Eight prior OWIs and failing FST is reasonable suspicion

44 years ago today I got the bar results

Saturday, August 25th, 12:20 pm, sent by Western Union telegram to the City Desk of the Arkansas Gazette from Hot Springs arriving shortly afternoon. Telegram …. Faxes didn’t exist yet.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on 44 years ago today I got the bar results

E.D.Mo.: Def stayed often enough with his mother that he had standing in her place

Defendant was given standing in his mother’s home, even though he did not live there full time. His uncle also lived there, and he had apparent authority and “free agency” to consent to a search of the premises. United States v. Anderson, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134148 (E.D. Mo. July 24, 2017). On standing:
Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Def stayed often enough with his mother that he had standing in her place