AP: Earlier search for Golden State Killer led to wrong man

AP: Earlier search for Golden State Killer led to wrong man by Michael Balsamo and Jonathan J. Cooper with Frank Stoltze:
Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on AP: Earlier search for Golden State Killer led to wrong man

D.Md.: After 4A claim affirmed on appeal, 2255 isn’t available to litigate the merits

No, the defendant doesn’t get to continue litigating his Fourth Amendment claim into infinity by going to 2255 after loosing the appeal. White v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70628 (D. Md. Apr. 26, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Md.: After 4A claim affirmed on appeal, 2255 isn’t available to litigate the merits

IN: Def slumped over steering wheel in hospital parking lot justified look in car based on emergency aid exception

A deputy sheriff was doing off-duty security work at a hospital same day surgery parking lot when he saw the defendant slumped over his steering wheel, the door open, and the engine off. When the officer turned on his take down lights, defendant came to and abruptly got out of the car and walked toward the officer who ordered him back to his car. Defendant’s detention was reasonable under the emergency aid exception. The fact defendant abruptly came to wasn’t determinative. Randall v. State, 2018 Ind. App. LEXIS 150 (Apr. 26, 2018).

Another Playpen search warrant sustained. United States v. Palaniappan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71289 (E.D. N.Y. Apr. 28, 2018).*

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IN: Def slumped over steering wheel in hospital parking lot justified look in car based on emergency aid exception

AL: There is no REP in a LPN on a vehicle

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a license plate, and the Fourth Amendment doesn’t prohibit running the tags for any reason. State v. Abrams, 2018 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 24 (Apr. 27, 2018).

The government obtained internet routing information from Google and Comcast, and that’s precisely the information obtainable without a search warrant under Miller. See United Statesv. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71 , 96 (2d Cir. 2017). United States v. Hammalian, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69621 (D. Vt. Apr. 25, 2018).*

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on AL: There is no REP in a LPN on a vehicle

NY4: Def’s actions supported PC for a body SW

Officers executing a search warrant saw defendant acting like he had something hidden in the back of his pants. Defendant’s squirming and clenching his butt strongly suggested to the officer that he had drugs hidden in his rectum. The search warrant for a body search was based on probable cause. People v. McLaurin, 2018 NY Slip Op 02983, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3026 (4th Dept. Apr. 27, 2018).

“Since the evidence submitted on that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to suppress physical evidence demonstrated the existence of probable cause to arrest him …, and that the items seized from his apartment were taken pursuant to a search warrant, suppression was properly denied without a hearing.” People v. Parker, 2018 NY Slip Op 02811, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2787 (2d Dept. Apr. 25, 2018).*

Posted in Body searches, Burden of pleading | Comments Off on NY4: Def’s actions supported PC for a body SW

PA: “Reason to believe” in Payton and Steagald means probable cause

“Reason to believe” in Payton and Steagald means probable cause. It cannot constitutionally be less and be faithful to the protection of the home from unreasonable invasions. This case includes a thorough discussion of both cases and their constitutional requirements. Commonwealth v. Romero, 2018 Pa. LEXIS 2054 (Apr. 26, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on PA: “Reason to believe” in Payton and Steagald means probable cause

W.D.Va.: Use of a summons under 19 U.S.C. § 1509 to obtain information to prosecute defendant for CP doesn’t violate 4A

The government used a summons under 19 U.S.C. § 1509 to obtain information to prosecute defendant for child pornography. Use of § 1509 didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment, and there’s no exclusionary rule for violation anyway. Defendant’s claim that the state search warrant lacked probable cause and had a Franks violation fails for a failure of overcoming the presumption of validity of a search warrant. United States v. Wellbeloved-Stone, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71002 (W.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2018). As to § 1509 summons and the Fourth Amendment:
Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Use of a summons under 19 U.S.C. § 1509 to obtain information to prosecute defendant for CP doesn’t violate 4A

E.D.Mich.: No PC for nexus to def’s house, and no GFE

The affidavit failed to show probable cause for nexus to defendant’s house. It was so devoid of probable cause that the good faith exception does not apply. United States v. Myles, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69373 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 25, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No PC for nexus to def’s house, and no GFE

E.D.N.Y.: Def’s search incident of his backpack for fraudulent use of a Metrocard was valid at least on GFE and inevitable discovery

Defendant was stopped for using a school student’s Metrocard to get on the NYC subway because he looked and was a so older. His backpacked was removed, and he was handcuffed. His backpack was searched incident to his arrest. The law of search incident is so confusing that the court applies the good faith exception instead. Moreover, the backpack would have been inventoried anyway, and was. United States v. Sobers, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68921 (E.D. N.Y. Apr. 25, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def’s search incident of his backpack for fraudulent use of a Metrocard was valid at least on GFE and inevitable discovery

CA8: Parked RV was “vehicle on the premises” even though connected to water and electricity

A parked RV qualified as a “vehicle on the premises” even though it would have taken 30 minutes to make it ready to move. It had a satellite dish on the roof and it was connected to water and electricity. United States v. Houck, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 10531 (8th Cir. Apr. 26, 2018).

Where defendant is represented by counsel, his pro so motion for return of property is a nullity. State v. Castagnola, 2018-Ohio-1604, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1737 (9th Dist. Apr. 25, 2018).

Defendant had a fair opportunity to litigate his suppression motion. His claim that he had appointed counsel who wouldn’t file a motion to suppress so he couldn’t file one pro se didn’t matter. United States v. Deem, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68141 (W.D. La. Apr. 24, 2018).*

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on CA8: Parked RV was “vehicle on the premises” even though connected to water and electricity

AR: State’s failure to get ruling on GFE below bars that argument on appeal; statute on BAC penalties violates Birchfield

Arkansas’s refusal to submit to a BAC test has criminal penalties, and it violates the Fourth Amendment. The trial court’s finding of voluntary consent was decided without an evidentiary hearing and is clearly erroneous. The state’s failure to get a ruling on application of the good faith exception in the trial court precluded that argument on appeal. Dortch v. State, 2018 Ark. 135, 2018 Ark. LEXIS 98 (Apr. 26, 2018).

Defendant borrowed a car and didn’t timely return it. When the car was found, he was told to get his stuff from it, and it appeared to be parts of a meth lab. This was reported to the police. They knew that defendant was involved in meth from before. The citizen informant’s story coupled with the state’s knowledge was probable cause, and nexus for the house was shown. State v. Risner, 2018-Ohio-1569, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1710 (12th Dist. Apr. 23, 2018).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on AR: State’s failure to get ruling on GFE below bars that argument on appeal; statute on BAC penalties violates Birchfield

CA5: Search of wrong house by inadequate investigation means no QI

It was clearly established that search of the wrong house because of inadequate investigation violated the Fourth Amendment. Gerhart v. Barnes, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 10626 (5th Cir. Apr. 26, 2018), prior opinion Gerhart v. McLendon, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21152 (5th Cir. Oct. 25, 2017) (posted here):
Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: Search of wrong house by inadequate investigation means no QI

Two on protective sweep

On plain error review, the protective sweep was reasonable. The officers had information that a suggested second person could have been in the house, and he or she hadn’t been found or found not to exist. United States v. Ford, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 10415 (8th Cir. Apr. 25, 2018).

Defendant was told that there may be an intruder at his house seeking revenge, and the police and he arrived at the house. Defendant consented to the police coming in to look [a kind of protective sweep]. That was consent to enter. State v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-1564, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1707 (9th Dist. Apr. 23, 2018).*

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on Two on protective sweep

E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW failed to show nexus, but GFE was enough to save it

“The bare assertion that defendant departed his home prior to engaging in a drug transaction does not ‘directly connect the residence with the suspected drug dealing activity.’ Id.” Peffer, 880 F.3d at 272-73 (quoting Brown, 828 F.3d at 383-84). The affidavit for the search warrant failed to show nexus to the house. Nevertheless, the search warrant survives by the good faith exception. “The affidavit in this case connects defendant to the vehicle, the vehicle to the house, and the house to defendant. Washington confirms that these are the precise connections required to overcome the ‘so lacking in minimal indicia’ test in order for the good faith exception to apply. Washingon, 380 F.3d at 242-43. Accordingly, although this warrant lacked probable cause, the good faith exception is applicable in this case.” United States v. Elizondo, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68232 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 24, 2018).

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW failed to show nexus, but GFE was enough to save it

techdirt: Appeals Court: Driving Attentively While Black Isn’t Probable Cause For A Traffic Stop

techdirt: Appeals Court: Driving Attentively While Black Isn’t Probable Cause For A Traffic Stop by Tim Cushing:
Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on techdirt: Appeals Court: Driving Attentively While Black Isn’t Probable Cause For A Traffic Stop

Reason.com: The Golden State Killer and Your Genetic Privacy

Reason.com: The Golden State Killer and Your Genetic Privacy by Ronald Bailey

“Any right of privacy in commercial DNA testers?” This was inevitable.
Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Reason.com: The Golden State Killer and Your Genetic Privacy

Vice: ICE Agents Should Know the Law, but They’re Fine with Warrantless Raids

Vice: ICE Agents Should Know the Law, but They’re Fine with Warrantless Raids by Eoin Higgins:

A leaked training manual says officers should be familiar with Fourth Amendment procedures. So what explains their aggressive actions on a New York farm?

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on Vice: ICE Agents Should Know the Law, but They’re Fine with Warrantless Raids

The Verge: A pioneer in predictive policing is starting a troubling new project

The Verge: A pioneer in predictive policing is starting a troubling new project By Ali Winston and Ingrid Burrington:
Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on The Verge: A pioneer in predictive policing is starting a troubling new project

NYTimes: Women Describe Invasive Strip Searches on Visits to City Jails

NYTimes: Women Describe Invasive Strip Searches on Visits to City Jails by Jan Ransom:
Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NYTimes: Women Describe Invasive Strip Searches on Visits to City Jails

NJ: Video of stop showed voluntariness of consent; fact officer mentioned getting a warrant was justified on facts

The video of the stop showed the consent was valid. At first it was denied, then it was granted. The officer’s mention of a search warrant was justified because of the smell of marijuana, and that did not make the consent coerced. State v. Hagans, 2018 N.J. LEXIS 489 (Apr. 23, 2018).

A tip led to surveillance of a motel room parking lot, and a hand-to-hand buy appeared to have occurred. That was probable cause for defendant’s detention in the parking lot. Assuming the warrantless entry into the motel room violated the Fourth Amendment, the subsequent warrant was based on independent source. United States v. Flores, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 10433 (1st Cir. Apr. 25, 2018).*

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on NJ: Video of stop showed voluntariness of consent; fact officer mentioned getting a warrant was justified on facts