AK: Homeowner has right to refuse police entry by consent

Alaska State Troopers came to defendant’s house with arrest warrants for two persons they suspected were inside. They had no search warrant for the third-party’s house. They beat on the door and demanded entry. Defendant at first refused, but he relented and came to the door and let them in. They could smell fresh growing marijuana, and he was arrested. One has a right to refuse entry by consent into his house. Suppressed. Bergeron v. State, 2018 Alas. App. LEXIS 248 (Oct. 31, 2018) (memorandum).

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on AK: Homeowner has right to refuse police entry by consent

S.D.Tex.: Carpenter applies to a 2015 CSLI application because the case is still pending

Carpenter applies to defendant’s CSLI because his case is still pending despite the fact the CSLI was obtained in 2015. Suppressed. United States v. Beverly, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183539 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2018).

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the search. His own argument about the consent of the owner belies his standing. Crane v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185632 (M.D. Ala. Oct. 30, 2018).*

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Carpenter applies to a 2015 CSLI application because the case is still pending

IL: Dog sniff at motel room door violates 4A

A 2014 dog sniff at a motel room door violates the Fourth Amendment, and a reasonably well-trained officer in Illinois would know that. Suppressed. People v. Lindsey, 2018 IL App (3d) 150877, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 807 (Oct. 30, 2018).

Officers used a ruse to gain access to defendant’s hotel room. His statement then was suppressed. A prior statement was not. United States v. Lara, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183707 (D. Maine Oct. 26, 2018).*

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff | Comments Off on IL: Dog sniff at motel room door violates 4A

NY3: Def’s admission he had MJ justified search of car; when it turned up empty, then a search of his person

Defendant admitted possession of marijuana during a traffic stop. After the car turned up empty, there was then probable cause for a search of his person. People v. Roulhac, 2018 NY Slip Op 07367, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7357 (3d Dept. Nov. 1, 2018).

The officers and probable cause for defendant’s arrest without a warrant. That permitted a search incident of his person. The alleged omissions in the affidavit for the search warrant for his place were not material and don’t meet the Franks threshold. United States v. Miller, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184010 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 26, 2018).*

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on NY3: Def’s admission he had MJ justified search of car; when it turned up empty, then a search of his person

N.D.Ind.: Govt showed emergency to locate serial robber by CSLI ping

Defendant is indicted for Hobbs Act robbery, and detectives believed he was in a string of robberies. They obtained ping information on the phone in an attempt to locate him before he committed another robbery. Exigency is shown by the government for the immediate action to get location of the phone to arrest defendant. This was in good faith reliance on the provisions providing for emergency ping orders. United States v. Hammond, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182866 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 24, 2018).

CSLI obtained a year before Carpenter with a search warrant was supported by probable cause. United States v. Grim, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182860 (D. Del. Oct. 25, 2018).*

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Govt showed emergency to locate serial robber by CSLI ping

D.N.M.: Federal criminal complaint supported PC for DNA sample

A federal criminal complaint can satisfy the probable cause requirement for a DNA sample. United States v. Mercado-Gracia, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182458 (D. N.M. Oct. 24, 2018).

Defendant’s term of probation permitting searches of his residence includes temporary quarters, such as a motel room. Cochran v. State, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 8859 (Tex. App. – Texarkana Oct. 31, 2018).

Posted in DNA, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Federal criminal complaint supported PC for DNA sample

D.Md.: Omitted information that supported PC belies the officer was attempting to mislead as to a mistake in the affidavit

The failure to include the date of uploading of child pornography images wasn’t known to the officer at the time the search warrant was obtained, so the officer did not mislead the magistrate issuing the warrant. The misstatement of the officer as to the IP address wasn’t intentional nor did it undermine probable cause. In addition, the officer omitted a wealth of information that would have shown more probable cause. That undermines the claim that the officer was attempting to mislead. United States v. Crockett, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182229 (D. Md. Oct. 24, 2018).

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Md.: Omitted information that supported PC belies the officer was attempting to mislead as to a mistake in the affidavit

Atlantic: VIDEO: You Should Be Worried About Your DNA Privacy

Atlantic: VIDEO: You Should Be Worried About Your DNA Privacy by Vishakha Darbha & Sarah Zhang:

As DNA tests such as 23andMe and AncestryDNA become increasingly prevalent, concerns about genetic privacy are mounting-and with good reason, says the Atlantic writer Sarah Zhang. In the latest Atlantic Argument, Zhang explains how the recent spate of arrests that were made due to DNA databases-the most famous being the Golden State Killer-are just the beginning.

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Atlantic: VIDEO: You Should Be Worried About Your DNA Privacy

CA9: Using ruse to gain entry for civil investigation and surreptitious video recording was a “search,” but QI applies

The use of a ruse to get consent to enter plaintiff’s house to conduct a civil fraud investigation violated the Fourth Amendment. The surreptitious use of a video recorder was a “search.” However, it was not clearly established at the time, so he gets qualified immunity. Whalen v. McMullen, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 30686 (9th Cir. Oct. 30, 2018).

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA9: Using ruse to gain entry for civil investigation and surreptitious video recording was a “search,” but QI applies

D.Minn.: Res judicata doesn’t bar relitigating motion to suppress within same proceeding

A ruling on a motion to suppress during the proceedings is subject to change. It is not governed by res judicata because it isn’t final. United States v. Baez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184017 (D. Minn. Aug. 30, 2018), adopted, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183647 (D. Minn. Oct. 26, 2018).

Officers had probable cause for defendant’s arrest and he fled, and they followed in hot pursuit into his house. “Defendant created the exigent circumstances by disregarding law enforcement’s commands to stop, grabbing his waistband, turning away from the officers, running inside the house, and closing the door.” A protective sweep was valid. United States v. Brown, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185187 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 30, 2018).

Posted in Hot pursuit, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Res judicata doesn’t bar relitigating motion to suppress within same proceeding

OH5: To prove GFE doesn’t apply, the defense has to show bad faith [never mind that the burden is on the govt in GFE]

Officers could conduct a protective sweep when executing a search warrant. “In the case at hand, there was no testimony regarding bad faith on part of the officers who searched the residence where Appellant was hiding.” State v. Davis, 2018-Ohio-4368, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 4698 (3d Dist. Oct. 29, 2018). [Since when is lack of proof of bad faith good faith?]

A jewelry store was robbed, and police came to the scene. Nearby, they encountered defendant walking along a road. “Given Thomas’s emergence from the bushes on Fire Burn Hill–the precise location and direction suspects were reported to be fleeing at the time–and his physical appearance–consistent with fleeing for a period of time–it was reasonable for Greaves to conclude that Thomas was one of the robbery suspects in flight from VIPD.” United States v. Thomas, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182521 (D. V.I. Oct. 24, 2018).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: To prove GFE doesn’t apply, the defense has to show bad faith [never mind that the burden is on the govt in GFE]

PA: There was no PC for entry on a two-month-old capias

Defendant was arrested as a result of an entry on a capias for a domestic relations “violation.” The warrant was two months getting served, and there was no inquiry into whether defendant was residing at the home of a friend at the time. Thus, there was no probable cause for the entry. Commonwealth v. Chisholm, 2018 PA Super 391, 2018 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1156 (Oct. 30, 2018).

Defendant was lawfully detained in the book-in area in the jail when she abandoned meth secreted in her vagina. Officers were attempting to get a search warrant for a body cavity search when abandonment occurred. State v. Ibarra, 2018 Ida. App. LEXIS 47 (Oct. 30, 2018).*

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Body searches | Comments Off on PA: There was no PC for entry on a two-month-old capias

D.Mass.: The govt had burden on exigency and it failed

The government failed to prove that exigency justified its warrantless entry. United States v. Caballero, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182505 (D. Mass. Oct. 24, 2018)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.Mass.: The govt had burden on exigency and it failed

OH2: As to motel room registered guest, entry permitted by arrest warrant under Payton

If the person being sought is a registered guest in a motel room, Payton permits entry on an arrest warrant. If a guest, then a search warrant is required under Steagald. His car outside the room gave reason to believe he was there. A protective sweep of the room was also justified. State v. Chavez, 2018-Ohio-4351, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 4673 (2d Dist. Oct. 26, 2018).

Defendant was stopped with reasonable suspicion under Terry for driving back and forth in front of a residence. He was Mirandized and consented to a search of his cell phone. Yopp v. Commonwealth, 2018 Ky. App. LEXIS 259 (Oct. 26, 2018).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Consent | Comments Off on OH2: As to motel room registered guest, entry permitted by arrest warrant under Payton

Fortune: Harvard Law Just Released 6.5 Million Court Decisions Online

Fortune: Harvard Law Just Released 6.5 Million Court Decisions Online by Jeff John Roberts:

In a significant milestone for public access to the law, the Library Innovation Lab at Harvard Law School on Monday published more than 40 million pages of U.S. court decisions online.

The publication, which represents nearly 6.5 million state and federal court cases, is the culmination of a five-year project that saw Harvard slice the spines off a vast collection of legal reporter books in order to digitize them.

The final product is a service called the Caselaw Access Project, which lets anyone access general information about all the cases, or else download large batches of entire cases on a state-by-state basis. The service includes an API, which will let coders build search tools and other products on top of the vast corpus of law.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Fortune: Harvard Law Just Released 6.5 Million Court Decisions Online

CA6: Def’s returning home right after heroin sale provides nexus to house

There was probable cause for the search warrant and the good faith exception applies. After a heroin sale, defendant returned right to his home. It was reasonable to infer there would be evidence of the crime originating or brought back there. United States v. Ball, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 30490 (6th Cir. Oct. 26, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Def’s returning home right after heroin sale provides nexus to house

W.D.N.Y.: Controlled buys corroborate CI

The CI wasn’t supported by past history, but was by controlled buys. United States v. Williams, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180895 (W.D. N.Y. Oct. 23, 2018).

“Finally, the affidavit articulated a reasonable nexus between the place to be searched (the phone) and the evidence the police believed they would find, including messages between Derf and Reed.” Pre-Carpenter use of SCA to get CSLI was valid at the time under the good faith exception, and the motion to suppress is denied. United States v. Reed, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183967 (D. Minn. Sept. 14, 2018), adopted, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181342 (D. Minn. Oct. 22, 2018).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Controlled buys corroborate CI

FL2: Calling the DA to see about whether a SW was needed is not actively seeking a warrant for inevitable discovery purposes

The trial court erred in applying the inevitable discovery doctrine. The officer had probable cause to conduct the search of defendant’s laptop, but this was insufficient to justify the detective’s failure to obtain a warrant to search it. His call to the state attorney’s office inquiring as to whether to secure a search warrant or simply obtain defendant’s wife’s consent did not constitute active pursuit of a search warrant. There was no evidence that a search warrant was being actively pursued prior to the illegal search of the laptop’s contents. Perez v. State, 2018 Fla. App. LEXIS 15280 (Fla. 2DCA Oct. 26, 2018).

Defendant lived with his girlfriend, and he was on probation. She consented to the search of the house and brought the police back to the house. There was reasonable suspicion for the parole search based on corroborated CI information. State v. Holmes, 2018 Del. Super. LEXIS 735 (Oct. 24, 2018).*

Posted in Consent, Inevitable discovery, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on FL2: Calling the DA to see about whether a SW was needed is not actively seeking a warrant for inevitable discovery purposes

D.Kan.: After a Franks hearing, PC exists despite omitted information

Defendant was under investigation for threatening to use a weapon of mass destruction. After the search, police found child pornography, too. He filed a Franks motion about omitted information and got a hearing. The court finds probable cause and no Franks violation. The omitted information had no bearing on probable cause. United States v. Stein, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181520 (D. Kan. Oct. 23, 2018).*

Defendant’s novel argument that California parole searches could not be conducted by law enforcement officers, too, is rejected. The statute is clear. There is a retroactivity argument if he went on parole before 1997 but not now. United States v. Davenport, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 30334 (9th Cir. Oct. 26, 2018).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Kan.: After a Franks hearing, PC exists despite omitted information

CA11: Rule 60 motion on old 2255 rejected for res judicata: the SW issues were litigated in 2010

Defendant filed a FRCP 60 motion to alter the judgment in his 2255 where he’d already lost in 2010 on various issues, including a search issue. The judgment is summarily affirmed as res judicata. United States v. Dortch, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 30170 (11th Cir. Oct. 25, 2018).*

The search warrant was with probable cause, but what was seized was such a minor part of the state’s case that, even if there was no probable cause, it was harmless error. People v. Terry, 2018 NY Slip Op 07172, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7141 (1st Dept. Oct. 25, 2018).*

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: Rule 60 motion on old 2255 rejected for res judicata: the SW issues were litigated in 2010