D.Minn.: Particularity for PC doesn’t mean BRD

The particularity requirement for a warrant doesn’t mean the specificity for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Banks, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177576 (D. Minn. Sep. 11, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Particularity for PC doesn’t mean BRD

E.D.N.C.: Person with lock on a storage unit has apparent authority to consent to its search

The person with a lock on a storage unit, even though not the renter, has apparent authority to consent to its search. United States v. Gibson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178083 (E.D.N.C. Sep. 11, 2025).

Rule 41 doesn’t mandate a search warrant be issued only by federal magistrates. In any event, the state court judge’s warrant was relied on in good faith. United States v. Wallace, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177650 (S.D. Ind. Sep. 11, 2025).

There was probable cause for the search of defendant’s car. He was stopped for suspicion of DUI, and he had a prior. He also talked about his drug history. In plain view was a baggie likely with drugs in it. United States v. Walker, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177536 (N.D. Iowa Sep. 11, 2025).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Automobile exception, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Person with lock on a storage unit has apparent authority to consent to its search

AR: Taking two minutes to review a SW application doesn’t make issuing judge not neutral and detached

The search warrant application was emailed to the issuing magistrate, and the warrant came back in two minutes. That doesn’t show that the judge was not neutral and detached because “an experienced judge can prudently review a succinct, factually detailed application in a short time.” Clevenger v. State, 2025 Ark. 128 (Sep. 11, 2025).

United States v. Holcomb, 132 F.4th 1118 (9th Cir. Mar. 27, 2025), posted here, is withdrawn (and updated there). New opinion to follow. United States v. Holcomb, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 23560 (9th Cir. Sep. 11, 2025).*

The plain view of foil for heating meth was reasonable suspicion for extending the stop. United States v. Buckner, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178021 (S.D. W. Va. Sep. 11, 2025).*

Defendant’s being asleep at the wheel on a road justified the stop and that led to an FST and arrest. United States v. Perez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177970 (D.S.D. Sep. 9, 2025).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: Taking two minutes to review a SW application doesn’t make issuing judge not neutral and detached

MO: No REP in hotel room mistakenly renting hotel room to unwanted guest

The fact a hotel mistakenly gave a room to an unwanted guest gave the guest no standing in the room when the hotel sought to eject him. State v. Mount, 2025 Mo. App. LEXIS 601 (Sep. 9, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Standing | Comments Off on MO: No REP in hotel room mistakenly renting hotel room to unwanted guest

techdirt: Federal Judges Are Done Playing Nice: NBC Reports Full-Scale Revolt Against SCOTUS Shadow Docket Bullshit

techdirt: Federal Judges Are Done Playing Nice: NBC Reports Full-Scale Revolt Against SCOTUS Shadow Docket Bullshit by Mike Masnick:

Continue reading
Posted in Immigration arrests, SCOTUS | Comments Off on techdirt: Federal Judges Are Done Playing Nice: NBC Reports Full-Scale Revolt Against SCOTUS Shadow Docket Bullshit

ABAJ: As Customs searches more electronic devices, lawyers have some considerations when they cross borders

ABAJ: As Customs searches more electronic devices, lawyers have some considerations when they cross borders by Anna Stolley Persky:

Continue reading
Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on ABAJ: As Customs searches more electronic devices, lawyers have some considerations when they cross borders

D.Mass.: Wooded area near def’s property was not his curtilage

The wooded area near defendant’s property was not his curtilage. United States v. Rodrigues, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176637 (D. Mass. Sep. 10, 2025).*

A cut and paste typo and an honest and material mistake on a connection to the premises was, to the trial court, a close question, and suppression was granted. Reversed. The mistakes could be overlooked. People v. Barnes, 2025 IL App (4th) 250014, 2025 Ill. App. LEXIS 1063 (Sep. 8, 2025).*

No good cause shown for a late filed motion to suppress. United States v. Shevchenko, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176126 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2025).*

A Kik social media employee wasn’t acting as a government agent when it reported child pornography to NCMEC. United States v. Guard, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 23364 (2d Cir. Sep. 10, 2025).*

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Wooded area near def’s property was not his curtilage

CA6: Business’s sole other employee had apparent authority to consent

Plaintiff’s adult child was the sole other employee of the business, and he had apparent authority to consent to a search. For all practical purpose, he’s in charge, too. Rockwood Auto Parts, Inc. v. Monroe Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 23406 (6th Cir. Sep. 10, 2025).

When CP comes to or from an IP address, the government doesn’t need knowledge of who lives there and uses it to show probable cause. United States v. Rodrigues, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176637 (D. Mass. Sep. 10, 2025).*

[Aside from the Stone bar,] petitioner’s claim Rule 41 was violated by the search warrant doesn’t provide grounds for 2255 relief. McGhee v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176366 (C.D. Ill. Sep. 10, 2025).*

The trial court’s failure to consider one of defendant’s search claims gets a remand. People v. Letts, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 7218 (Sep. 9, 2025).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Exclusionary rule, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Business’s sole other employee had apparent authority to consent

S.D.Cal.: Handcuffing DV detainee was reasonable, but search of his bag was without RS

Officers responding to a 911 call about alleged domestic violence in public handcuffed defendant. This was reasonable at the time. Reasonable suspicion for a search of the cross body bag on him was lacking. He was handcuffed, there was no inkling there was a weapon in there, but the officers were only interested in defendant’s criminal history and potential for drug use. United States v. Beltran, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176018 (S.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2025).

The officer’s failure to mention things he knew nothing about wasn’t a Franks violation. On the whole, there was probable cause for this anticipatory warrant. United States v. Vishnevski, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177145 (S.D. Ill. Sep. 10, 2025).*

Defendant failed in his burden of showing standing in the rental car that was searched he was only a passenger in. At any rate, the protective sweep of the car was reasonable. United States v. Jones, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176685 (E.D. Mo. Sep. 10, 2025).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Handcuffing DV detainee was reasonable, but search of his bag was without RS

OR: CP warrant was overbroad

The warrant for defendant’s computer was overbroad in seeking alleged child pornography of others than the known alleged victims, essentially based on assumptions about child pornographers. State v. Schult, 343 Or. App. 376 (Sep. 10, 2025). This is a rarity:

Continue reading
Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on OR: CP warrant was overbroad

ABAJ: Kavanaugh cites precedent, ‘common sense’ in supporting SCOTUS order allowing immigration stops

ABAJ: Kavanaugh cites precedent, ‘common sense’ in supporting SCOTUS order allowing immigration stops by Debra Cassens Weiss (“Justice Brett Kavanaugh explained his agreement with a U.S. Supreme Court stay on Monday that allowed the federal government to continue making immigration stops in the Los Angeles area based on factors that include apparent ethnicity and the type of work done. In a concurrence, Kavanaugh said apparent ethnicity alone does not justify reasonable suspicion supporting an immigration stop, but it can be a relevant factor when combined with other factors.”)

The Atlantic: The Government Wants to See Your Papers by Tom Nichols (“And the Supreme Court decides that the Fourth Amendment might not be for everyone.” “‘You there. Stop what you’re doing. Take off that tool belt and hard hat—let’s see some ID. Why? Because we don’t think you’re a citizen. Now show us your papers.‘ This kind of behavior by government officials is now legal in the United States.”)

MSNBC: Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment order highlights the shadow docket problem by Jordan Rubin:

Continue reading
Posted in Immigration arrests, SCOTUS | Comments Off on ABAJ: Kavanaugh cites precedent, ‘common sense’ in supporting SCOTUS order allowing immigration stops

CA10: Having the driver get out is within the scope of any traffic stop

Having the driver come back to the patrol car is a basic safety concern within the scope of any traffic stop. United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 23113 (10th Cir. Sep. 8, 2025).

“Voorhis’s false arrest claim is meritless based on the ‘any-crime rule.’ Rivera-Guadalupe, 124 F.4th at 303. According to the any-crime rule, a police officer defendant can defeat a false arrest claim by showing that he had probable cause to arrest the plaintiff for ‘any offense that could be charged under the circumstances.’ Id. at 299 (quoting Wright v. City of Phila., 409 F.3d 595, 602 (3d Cir. 2005)). ‘[P]robable cause to arrest exists if there is a ‘fair probability’ that the person committed the crime at issue.’ Dempsey v. Bucknell Univ., 834 F.3d 457, 467 (3d Cir. 2016) (internal quotations and citation omitted).” Voorhis v. Ginkel, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 22973 (3d Cir. Sep. 5, 2025).*

The bookbag found in defendant’s room was searched under his release conditions waiver. He doesn’t even claim it was his for standing [which was a moot point]. State v. Thompson, 2025-Ohio-3262 (9th Dist. Sep. 10, 2025).*

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Having the driver get out is within the scope of any traffic stop

Stingrays are back

Forbes: How ICE Is Using Fake Cell Towers To Spy On People’s Phones by Thomas Brewster:

Continue reading
Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on Stingrays are back

E.D.La.: AirBnb permittees have no REP in information already voluntarily provided to city

AirBnb and its permittees don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in information that was already essentially turned over to the city in getting permits in the first place. Bodin v. City of New Orleans, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174172 (E.D. La. Sep. 5, 2025).*

Even if defense counsel did a better job of showing defendant’s alleged standing to challenge the search, there’s no way he’d win on the merits anyway. So no IAC. Harris v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173527 (S.D. Fla. Sep. 5, 2025).*

Defendant fails on his Franks burden: “Initially, Defendant has not specifically identified any alleged false statements in the Affidavit, nor has he specified any items that he contends were omitted. Rather, Defendant broadly states that the Affidavit ‘contains various misstatements and material omissions that render the same invalid,’ … without further elaboration. (… (claiming that ‘there are material omissions, misstatements, and misrepresentations made to the magistrate,’ but failing to identify the same). This is directly contrary to Franks’ requirement that he must specifically identify the false statements or omissions. See Franks, 438 U.S. at 171; ….” United States v. Aikens, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174149 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 8, 2025).*

The affidavit for search warrant was based on probable cause. [And it isn’t even close.] United States v. Pitter, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174092 (M.D. Fla. Sep. 8, 2025).*

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on E.D.La.: AirBnb permittees have no REP in information already voluntarily provided to city

LAT: You look Latino. You speak Spanish. You work hard. That’s now probable cause.

LAT: You look Latino. You speak Spanish. You work hard. That’s now probable cause. by Dean Florez (“When I was a young UCLA constitutional law major, we learned that the Constitution wasn’t just parchment behind glass: It was a living promise, fragile and ferocious, meant to protect the people when power overreached. But on Monday morning, the Supreme Court taught me something new: that those promises, in the hands of a certain kind of court, can vanish without argument, without a hearing, without even a signed name. In Noem vs. Vasquez Perdomo, a majority of justices gave a silent blessing to immigration raids in Los Angeles that target people for looking Latino, speaking Spanish and working jobs that build this country but never pay enough to live in it.”)

Reason: Supreme Court Issues Dubious “Shadow Docket” Ruling Staying Injunction Against Racial Profiling in Immigration Enforcement by Ilya Somin.

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on LAT: You look Latino. You speak Spanish. You work hard. That’s now probable cause.

404 Media: ICE Spends Millions on Clearview AI Facial Recognition to Find People ‘Assaulting’ Officers

404 Media: ICE Spends Millions on Clearview AI Facial Recognition to Find People ‘Assaulting’ Officers by Joseph Cox:

Continue reading
Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on 404 Media: ICE Spends Millions on Clearview AI Facial Recognition to Find People ‘Assaulting’ Officers

The Guardian: US Supreme Court ‘effectively legalized racial profiling’, immigration experts warn

The Guardian: US Supreme Court ‘effectively legalized racial profiling’, immigration experts warn:

Continue reading
Posted in Immigration arrests, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on The Guardian: US Supreme Court ‘effectively legalized racial profiling’, immigration experts warn

NYT: Supreme Court Lifts Restrictions on L.A. Immigration Stops

NYT: Supreme Court Lifts Restrictions on L.A. Immigration Stops by Adam Liptak (“federal judge had ordered agents not to make indiscriminate stops relying on factors like a person’s ethnicity or that they speak Spanish.”) The order is here.

Kavanaugh, J., concurring:

Continue reading
Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NYT: Supreme Court Lifts Restrictions on L.A. Immigration Stops

CA5: Bailing out and running away from open truck at a convenience store was abandonment

Bailing out of a truck on the sidewalk of a convenience store and running away leaving the windows open and it unlocked is an abandonment. United States v. Tsatenawa, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 23079 (5th Cir. Sep. 5, 2025).

The affidavit for warrant here was not just bare bones, so the good faith exception applies. United States v. Rayos, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 23081 (5th Cir. Sep. 5, 2025).*

Plaintiff was arrested by immigration officers but was denied a probable cause determination thereafter in violation of federal law. His removal from New Mexico pending this case is enjoined. Lira v. Noem, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173818 (D.N.M. Sep. 5, 2025).*

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim in this custody matter wasn’t presented below so it’s waived. Tirado v. Tirado, 2025-Ohio-3170 (1st Dist. Sept. 5, 2025).*

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Immigration arrests, Waiver | Comments Off on CA5: Bailing out and running away from open truck at a convenience store was abandonment

AP: Woman wrongly accused of carjacking loses lawsuit against Detroit police who used facial tech

AP: Woman wrongly accused of carjacking loses lawsuit against Detroit police who used facial tech by Ed White (“ A judge has dismissed a lawsuit against Detroit police in the wrongful arrest of a pregnant woman who was charged in a carjacking partly because of facial recognition technology. Porcha Woodruff, who was eight months pregnant, spent 10 hours in jail after she was arrested at her suburban Detroit home while getting children ready for school in February 2023. Police admitted she was the wrong suspect, and charges were eventually dropped. Detroit has changed how it uses facial recognition technology based on Woodruff’s arrest and another case.”)

Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on AP: Woman wrongly accused of carjacking loses lawsuit against Detroit police who used facial tech