The Economist: Surveillance is a fact of life, so make privacy a human right

The Economist: Surveillance is a fact of life, so make privacy a human right by K.N.C.:
Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on The Economist: Surveillance is a fact of life, so make privacy a human right

Lawfare: Trump Administration Proposes Rule to Collect DNA From Detained Noncitizens

Lawfare: Trump Administration Proposes Rule to Collect DNA From Detained Noncitizens by Krista Oehlke (“The Department of Justice on Oct. 15 proposed a rule that would enable the DNA collection of noncitizens in immigration detention and the transfer of that information into a national criminal database. The rule would affect the more than 40,000 people currently held in immigration detention facilities. Civil rights groups have already warned that the rule may implicate serious privacy concerns and denigrates the civil rights and liberties of the most vulnerable.”)

Posted in DNA, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on Lawfare: Trump Administration Proposes Rule to Collect DNA From Detained Noncitizens

D.V.I.: GFE applies to searches before the court held U.S. to V.I. packages weren’t border searches

Applying its prior Baxter case, the District of the Virgin Islands holds that the border search exception doesn’t apply to mail and packages shipped from the Continental U.S. The searches here, however, predated Baxter, so the good faith exception applies. United States v. Tyson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212994 (D.V.I. Dec. 11, 2019).

The trial court’s failure to make findings of voluntariness of consent after Birchfield required remand. State v. Franklin, 2019 N.M. App. LEXIS 136 (Dec. 9, 2019).*

Defendant never raised his staleness challenge in the district court so it’s waived on appeal. To the extent that the court can determine it, it’s denied on the merits. This search warrant is not presumptively stale in a mere 12 hours. United States v. Evans, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 36635 (6th Cir. Dec. 11, 2019).*

Posted in Border search, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on D.V.I.: GFE applies to searches before the court held U.S. to V.I. packages weren’t border searches

D.Vt.: PC shown for DNA sample in kidnapping case

Defendant is charged with kidnapping of a minor across state lines and interstate transportation of a stolen vehicle. The government showed probable cause and particularity for defendant’s DNA to further link him to the crime. United States v. Simpson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212692 (D.Vt. Dec. 10, 2019).*

“Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that defendants violated his federal constitutional [Fourth Amendment] and other rights in the course of a prior civil suit which the United States brought against him on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for failure to pay federal income taxes.” He sued in state court in Ohio, and the government properly removed the case to federal court for federal question jurisdiction. The motion to remand is denied. Steele v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212717 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 10, 2019).*

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on D.Vt.: PC shown for DNA sample in kidnapping case

CA9: There was PC for the warrant for the premises, and officers were not unreasonable in continuing the search for an hour when they learned their target didn’t live there

Officers got a search warrant for a mobile home, and found out when they executed it that their target didn’t live there. The search warrant was based on informant hearsay that was reliable enough for the search warrant to issue. The officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment by continuing the search after they learned the target didn’t live there because the search warrant was directed at a place, not really a person [but that’s part of the probable cause]. Also, plaintiff’s one-hour detention at her age (74) was not unreasonable. Blight v. City of Manteca, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 36636 (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 2019).

The merits of the validity of the search warrant isn’t determined because the challenged and questionable information can be removed from the affidavit and the affidavit retested. Doing so, there still is probable cause, and the motion to suppress is denied. State v. Burchill, 2019 MT 285, 2019 Mont. LEXIS 1147 (Dec. 10, 2019).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: There was PC for the warrant for the premises, and officers were not unreasonable in continuing the search for an hour when they learned their target didn’t live there

D.N.M.: Conflict of laws between circuits: Apply the law where the search occurred, subject maybe to good faith understandings [?]

In a search that took place in Arizona conducted in part by New Mexico officers, the court considers the conflict of laws question of which circuit’s law should apply: the circuit where the search occurred. At bottom, however, the court finds no material difference between the law of the two circuits and does not suppress the search. United States v. Maley, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212585 (D. N.M. Dec. 10, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Conflict of laws between circuits: Apply the law where the search occurred, subject maybe to good faith understandings [?]

FL1: Patdown for drugs permitted cutting hole in def’s underwear to retrieve that which wouldn’t fall out

The officer smelled the strong odor in defendant’s car and got him out. There was the strong odor on defendant’s person, too. A patdown revealed a lump under defendant’s shorts. The officer tried to shake it loose and couldn’t. He then cut a hole in defendant’s underwear to get it out. This “reach-in” was reasonable under all the circumstances. Hilliard v. State, 2019 Fla. App. LEXIS 18278 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 10, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on FL1: Patdown for drugs permitted cutting hole in def’s underwear to retrieve that which wouldn’t fall out

TX14: Bodycam video supported trial court’s findings of voluntariness of consent to search

The bodycam video supports the trial court’s conclusion that the consent to search was voluntarily given. Blue v. State, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 10658 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Dec. 10, 2019) (with a dissent).

“Kelley’s only claim–a Fourth Amendment claim based on a 2018 Supreme Court decision–does not implicate the voluntariness of his guilty plea or any of the other types of cases considered outside the scope of a valid waiver.” It isn’t cognizable in a 2255. United States v. Truth, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212378 (W.D. Va. Dec. 10, 2019).*

Defendant was arrested with a backpack and it was searched in the course of his arrest. The court struggles at length with the search incident doctrine in the First Circuit and opts not to decide the question, instead deciding the search was valid as an inventory. United States v. Wilson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212524 (D.N.H. Dec. 10, 2019).

Posted in Body cameras, Consent, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on TX14: Bodycam video supported trial court’s findings of voluntariness of consent to search

TX1: Def lost REP in his mislaid phone that somebody found and opened to try and discern the owner to return it

Defendant mislaid his cell phone, and he didn’t abandon it. Nevertheless, it was available for anyone to pick up and turn in to somebody to help find him. Moreover, it wasn’t passcode protected, and it was reasonable for someone to attempt to find the owner by opening the phone. Oseguera-Viera v. State, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 10671 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) Dec. 10, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX1: Def lost REP in his mislaid phone that somebody found and opened to try and discern the owner to return it

The Intercept: The Donald Trump Campaign Is Deploying Phone Location-Tracking Technology

The Intercept: The Donald Trump Campaign Is Deploying Phone Location-Tracking Technology by Lee Fang (“President Donald Trump’s reelection effort has retained the services of a technology company that specializes in the mass collection of smartphone location data, which can be used to track voters for political targeting purposes.”)

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on The Intercept: The Donald Trump Campaign Is Deploying Phone Location-Tracking Technology

WaPo: She installed a Ring camera in her children’s room for ‘peace of mind.’ A hacker accessed it and harassed her 8-year-old daughter.

WaPo: She installed a Ring camera in her children’s room for ‘peace of mind.’ A hacker accessed it and harassed her 8-year-old daughter. By Allyson Chiu (“Several Ring users nationwide have reported that their security systems were also infiltrated by hackers who harassed them through the camera’s two-way talk function.”)
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: She installed a Ring camera in her children’s room for ‘peace of mind.’ A hacker accessed it and harassed her 8-year-old daughter.

CA11: The lack of even arguable PC for ptf’s arrest denies the officer QI

This is a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claim. “The district court, upon a close analysis of the elements of the crimes alleged, determined that the facts proffered by Detective Brashears are insufficient to establish probable cause, or even arguable probable cause, to arrest the Pierces. Accordingly, the district court denied him qualified immunity on the Pierces’ constitutional claims. Based upon our review of the record, we agree with the district court’s well-reasoned order and affirm the denial of qualified immunity to Detective Brashears on the Pierces’ claim of malicious prosecution.” Pierce v. Clayton County, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 36497 (11th Cir. Dec. 10, 2019).*

A furtive movement and a “conspicuously raised floormat” were reasonable suspicion. The sudden furtive movement was actually probable cause. United States v. McGhee, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 36505 (8th Cir. Dec. 10, 2019).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: The lack of even arguable PC for ptf’s arrest denies the officer QI

MA: The fact co-conspirators coordinated in planning the crime was nexus to def’s cell phone

The state showed a nexus to defendant’s cell phone and the crime under investigation because the participants were coordinating with each other before hand. “We have no evidence that the purpose of the cell phone call between the defendant, when he was arrested, and his girlfriend was to cover up the crime, as the Commonwealth contends. However, we need no such evidence. ‘[T]he fact that police did not know to a certainty that [the coventurer] was using his cellular telephone to communicate regarding the crime under investigation is not dispositive as to the question of nexus. Holley, 478 Mass. at 526-527.” Commonwealth v. Snow, 2019 Mass. App. LEXIS 172 (Dec. 10, 2019).

Wearing vests with “POLICE” on them and yelling at defendant “Police; stop!” was a seizure, and here it was completely without probable cause or reasonable suspicion even crediting every word of their testimony. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Sears, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212175 (D. N.J. Dec. 10, 2019).*

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on MA: The fact co-conspirators coordinated in planning the crime was nexus to def’s cell phone

NBC News: The FBI’s warrant system for spying on Americans is a mess, the IG report shows

NBC News: The FBI’s warrant system for spying on Americans is a mess, the IG report shows by Ken Dilanian (“Analysis: The report found an FBI process so rife with errors that the bureau’s director immediately issued a statement saying he would begin reforms.”)

Posted in FISA, National security | Comments Off on NBC News: The FBI’s warrant system for spying on Americans is a mess, the IG report shows

Reason: The FBI Will Be Audited to See How Frequently They Screw Up Other FISA Warrants

Reason: The FBI Will Be Audited to See How Frequently They Screw Up Other FISA Warrants by Scott Shackford (“Was what happened with Carter Page an anomaly or does the agency regularly leave out important information?”)

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on Reason: The FBI Will Be Audited to See How Frequently They Screw Up Other FISA Warrants

Vox: How to avoid a dystopian future of facial recognition in law enforcement

Vox: How to avoid a dystopian future of facial recognition in law enforcement y Shirin Ghaffary (“The future of police surveillance doesn’t have to be scary. But government and citizens need to step up.”)

Vox: What facial recognition steals from us by Josh Foss (“A video explainer on the technology that’s changing the meaning of the human face.”)

recode: What facial recognition steals from us by Joss Fong (“A video explainer on the technology that’s changing the meaning of the human face.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Vox: How to avoid a dystopian future of facial recognition in law enforcement

Creators.com: What’s Wrong with FISA?

Creators.com: What’s Wrong with FISA? by Andrew P. Napolitano:
Continue reading →

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on Creators.com: What’s Wrong with FISA?

EFF: Genetic Genealogy Company GEDmatch Acquired by Company With Ties to FBI & Law Enforcement—Why You Should Be Worried

EFF: Genetic Genealogy Company GEDmatch Acquired by Company With Ties to FBI & Law Enforcement—Why You Should Be Worried by Jennifer Lynch:
Continue reading →

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on EFF: Genetic Genealogy Company GEDmatch Acquired by Company With Ties to FBI & Law Enforcement—Why You Should Be Worried

E.D.Pa.: Length of def’s participation in DTO undermines his staleness argument

There was probable cause defendant was a major player in a DTO, and that his participation went on for months. This, he concedes, undermines his staleness argument. United States v. Williams, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211403 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 6, 2019).*

A verdict for plaintiffs against a social worker for unreasonably ordering children taken from the parents is affirmed, as is the $499,000 attorneys fee. Lewis v. County of San Diego, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 36421 (9th Cir. Dec. 9, 2019).*

This search of a person on supervised release was with reasonable suspicion of a violation of terms of release as well as more specific information he might be armed. The search was reasonable on its justification and scope. United States v. Stigler, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211717 (S.D. Iowa Nov. 1, 2019).*

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Length of def’s participation in DTO undermines his staleness argument

E.D.N.C.: Officers came to the door with PC but no warrant; def’s shutting door and moving around inside led officers to believe he was destroying evidence, and entry was justified

When officers came to the door with probable cause for the presence of marijuana, defendant’s shutting the door and moving about inside for up to 90 seconds created apprehension that he was destroying evidence. Also, there was at least reasonable suspicion someone else was inside for a protective sweep. United States v. Harris, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211633 (E.D. N.C. Dec. 9, 2019).

Defendant was a passenger in the car that was searched. He claimed an ownership interest in helping make payments, paying for maintenance, and having a key. He did not, however, have his name on the title. Without more corroboration from the registered owner, the court doesn’t credit him as having standing. United States v. Johnson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211503 (M.D. La. Dec. 9, 2019).*

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Officers came to the door with PC but no warrant; def’s shutting door and moving around inside led officers to believe he was destroying evidence, and entry was justified