Monthly Archives: January 2020

WaPo: Colorado just used its gun seizure law for the first time — one day after it took effect

WaPo: Colorado just used its gun seizure law for the first time — one day after it took effect by Derek Hawkins

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: Colorado just used its gun seizure law for the first time — one day after it took effect

D.D.C.: No statute of limitations for equitable actions for return of property not forfeited

Plaintiff pro se and post-conviction filed a pleading for return of property. Some was forfeited, and it was treated as a motion to set aside the forfeitures. Some were not forfeited, and there is no statute of limitations for equitable … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.D.C.: No statute of limitations for equitable actions for return of property not forfeited

WaPo: FBI asks Apple for help cracking Pensacola gunman’s iPhones

WaPo: FBI asks Apple for help cracking Pensacola gunman’s iPhones by Devlin Barrett: The FBI is pressing Apple for help opening iPhones that belonged to the Saudi military student who killed three people last month at a naval base in … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: FBI asks Apple for help cracking Pensacola gunman’s iPhones

M.D.Pa. Delay in searching cell phones wasn’t unreasonable because def was in jail out of possession anyway

The delay between seizing defendant’s cell phones and searching them wasn’t unreasonable considering he was in jail and would have had no access to them anyway. United States v. Carey, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1150 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 6, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Pa. Delay in searching cell phones wasn’t unreasonable because def was in jail out of possession anyway

D.Mass.: Attacking only GFE when court found both PC and GFE states no 2255 claim

The district court before conviction held that the search warrant was based on probable cause and the good faith exception would apply. In his 2255, defendant argues that defense counsel was ineffective for not better arguing the good faith exception. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Attacking only GFE when court found both PC and GFE states no 2255 claim

OH5: Knock-and-talk led to smell of MJ grow; entry for protective sweep before getting SW wasn’t unreasonable

Police came to do a knock-and-talk, and they could smell a marijuana grow from outside. They decided to do a protective sweep for people before they left to get a search warrant because they heard music from inside the home. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH5: Knock-and-talk led to smell of MJ grow; entry for protective sweep before getting SW wasn’t unreasonable

CA10: Causing a handcuffed unseatbelted arrestee to be bounced around the back seat while driving fast and recklessly states an excessive force claim; no QI

“McCowan based his excessive-force claim on his assertion that Officer Moralez placed McCowan in the back seat of a patrol car, handcuffed behind his back and unrestrained by a seatbelt, and then drove recklessly to the police station, knowing his … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Causing a handcuffed unseatbelted arrestee to be bounced around the back seat while driving fast and recklessly states an excessive force claim; no QI

CA11: Domestic disturbance call with a report of shots fired permitted a warrantless entry and then a protective sweep for victims

A domestic disturbance call with a report of shots fired permitted a warrantless entry and then a protective sweep for victims: “Based on the 911 call reporting gunshots and a domestic disturbance, combined with Peacock’s initial observations upon arriving at … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA11: Domestic disturbance call with a report of shots fired permitted a warrantless entry and then a protective sweep for victims

D.Mont.: With court ordered pinging of cell phone, govt violated no REP in following the pings

Once officers had a warrant authorizing capturing defendant’s cell phone pings back even in 2015, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his movements in public when they were following him based on the result of the pings. Therefore, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Mont.: With court ordered pinging of cell phone, govt violated no REP in following the pings

D.N.J.: Habeas pet’r doesn’t show case outcome would be different if motion to suppress had been litigated

To prevail on a Fourth Amendment IAC claim, there are essentially three things to prove, not just two: (a) defense counsel failed to litigate a search issue (b) that not only would have prevailed on the search issue, (c) but … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Habeas pet’r doesn’t show case outcome would be different if motion to suppress had been litigated

E.D.Tenn.: Consent to protective sweep led to plain view of money under a bed

Defendant consented to a protective sweep, and, looking under a bed, the officer saw a duffle bag with money showing. That was a reasonable search. United States v. Stanton, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 778 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 3, 2020).* “To … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Consent to protective sweep led to plain view of money under a bed

LA Times: Black drivers face more police stops in California, state analysis shows

LA Times: Black drivers face more police stops in California, state analysis shows by Anita Chabria (“Black drivers in some of California’s largest cities are stopped and searched by police at higher rates than white and Latino motorists, according to … Continue reading

Posted in Police misconduct, Pretext | Comments Off on LA Times: Black drivers face more police stops in California, state analysis shows

The Recorder/Law.com: Ring Slapped With Lawsuit Following Reports of Camera Security Breaches

The Recorder/Law.com: Ring Slapped With Lawsuit Following Reports of Camera Security Breaches by Alaina Lancaster (“Despite Amazon-owned Ring’s suite of security offerings, the federal complaint contends that the company has failed to set up ‘even basic cybersecurity protections.’”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Recorder/Law.com: Ring Slapped With Lawsuit Following Reports of Camera Security Breaches

NM: Officer’s inferences for RS don’t require certainty

Reasonable suspicion was found here on the totality from experience, logical inferences, and the high-crime nature of the area where it was going on. “[W]hile it was possible Martinez’s conduct was innocuous, Officer Garrison was not required to wait until … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Officer’s inferences for RS don’t require certainty

D.Neb.: Handcuffing on RS to assure safety and maintain the status quo reasonable and not a de facto arrest

Handcuffing a person on reasonable suspicion just to protect the officer’s safety and maintain the status quo is not unreasonable. United States v. Mayfield, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 520 (D. Neb. Jan. 3, 2020). While the exclusionary rule can apply … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Forfeiture, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Handcuffing on RS to assure safety and maintain the status quo reasonable and not a de facto arrest

CA11: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to revocation of supervised release; SCOTUS would so hold

The exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of supervised release conditions. While SCOTUS hasn’t ruled on that precise question, its parole and probation search cases are a clear sign it will follow them there. United States v. Hill, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA11: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to revocation of supervised release; SCOTUS would so hold

CA6: 15 dogs abandoned in a house living in squalor was exigency for warrantless entry

Plaintiff kept 15 dogs in her house in squalor. She went out of town and didn’t provide for them. Her “associates” reported the situation to animal control and they entered the house and seized the animals. The entry and seizure … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA6: 15 dogs abandoned in a house living in squalor was exigency for warrantless entry

CA7: Police shooting at a car shooting at others was a reasonable use of deadly force

Police shooting at a car that just fired at others was not an unreasonable use of deadly force against the occupants. Ybarra v. City of Chicago, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 62 (7th Cir. Jan. 3, 2020):

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA7: Police shooting at a car shooting at others was a reasonable use of deadly force

W.D.N.Y.: No PC for arrest or SW; GFE hearing wasn’t concluded, and it shall now

The defendant’s arrest on this thin claim from an unproven and unreliable CI was without probable cause, and the search of his person is suppressed. The search warrant was also issued without probable cause, but the part of the hearing … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: No PC for arrest or SW; GFE hearing wasn’t concluded, and it shall now

OH8: Malpractice ptf already lost on the merits of Franks claim in direct criminal appeal, defense counsel didn’t commit malpractice handling it

Plaintiff is an inmate pro se pursuing a legal malpractice claim against his criminal defense counsel. The defendant lawyer gets judgment on the pleadings based on the fact the conviction was affirmed on the ground that the defense counsel’s challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: Malpractice ptf already lost on the merits of Franks claim in direct criminal appeal, defense counsel didn’t commit malpractice handling it