Daily Archives: January 31, 2020

MA: Def’s frisk during his traffic stop was unjustified and unreasonable

The granting of defendant’s motion to suppress is affirmed. Although the stop of his vehicle was proper, his frisk was improper as was the search of his car which was based on the results of the improper frisk. Defendant’s actions … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Def’s frisk during his traffic stop was unjustified and unreasonable

S.D.N.Y.: In a 3 page affidavit for SW, showing the crimes under investigation was particular enough

The affidavits for search warrant are only three pages long, and they reference the crimes under investigation on page one or the first paragraph. That is enough here to show particularity. “The Court concludes that the fact that these brief … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: In a 3 page affidavit for SW, showing the crimes under investigation was particular enough

EFF: New Bill Would Make Needed Steps Toward Curbing Mass Surveillance

EFF: New Bill Would Make Needed Steps Toward Curbing Mass Surveillance by India McKinney & Andrew Crocker (“The Safeguarding Americans’ Private Records Act is a Strong Bill That Builds on Previous Surveillance Reforms”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: New Bill Would Make Needed Steps Toward Curbing Mass Surveillance

D.Me.: It wasn’t unreasonable for the officer to delay def’s arrest until they moved to where another officer was for safety

It wasn’t unreasonable for the officer to forgo defendant’s arrest and get him to walk with the officer to the house where another officer was waiting. This was for safety purposes. United States v. Brigley, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13938 … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Me.: It wasn’t unreasonable for the officer to delay def’s arrest until they moved to where another officer was for safety

N.D.Ga.: Explicit collective detail of three CIs was probable cause

The explicit collective detail of the three informants was probable cause. United States v. Morelock, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225737 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 9, 2019), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12596 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 27, 2020)*:

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Explicit collective detail of three CIs was probable cause