Daily Archives: January 25, 2020

Iowa’s cases from Thursday

There was probable cause based on the dashcam video for defendant’s stop for not having two functioning headlights. “Here, what the video evidence shows is unquestionably open to interpretation as to whether the headlight was inoperable or just dim. Whatever … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Iowa’s cases from Thursday

CA7: Ptf’s suit for arrest for possession and obstruction was barred by arguable PC

Plaintiff was arrested for possession of cocaine and obstructing justice when he allegedly swallowed the baggie of drugs. He was taken to a hospital and drank charcoal and other liquids to pass it and he was x-rayed. Nothing was recovered. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Collective knowledge, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf’s suit for arrest for possession and obstruction was barred by arguable PC

W.D.Ky.: An open container doesn’t permit a search of an entire car under automobile exception or search incident

An open container in a car doesn’t grant the police the authority to search the entire vehicle for another open container. It is implausible to believe that another would be found outside of the passenger compartment. United States v. Thomas, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: An open container doesn’t permit a search of an entire car under automobile exception or search incident

CA9: Vacated and dismissed case on post-conviction doesn’t invoke Heck bar

Three men convicted in Alaska state court got their convictions vacated and dismissed when someone else confessed to the crime. The lack of a criminal judgment rendered the Heck bar inapplicable. Roberts v. City of Fairbanks, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abstention | Comments Off on CA9: Vacated and dismissed case on post-conviction doesn’t invoke Heck bar

D.N.M.: “Brady does not require the United States to disclose impeachment evidence before suppression hearings.”

“Brady does not require the United States to disclose impeachment evidence before suppression hearings.” United States v. Deleon, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9688 (D.N.M. Jan. 21, 2020). Defendant’s motion to suppress for lack of nexus between defendant’s home and possession … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Nexus | Comments Off on D.N.M.: “Brady does not require the United States to disclose impeachment evidence before suppression hearings.”

S.D.W.Va.: Reasonable mistake of fact def’s license was invalid doesn’t void the stop; smell of MJ led to search

The officer’s reasonable mistake of fact defendant’s license was invalid doesn’t void the stop. “In sum, Detective Maniskas was sufficiently diligent in his investigation of Qualls’ licenses. The fact that Qualls’ license was actually valid has no impact on Maniskas’ … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Reasonable mistake of fact def’s license was invalid doesn’t void the stop; smell of MJ led to search

OH5: Officer’s entry into garage following erratic driver was justified as a welfare check on condition of driver, even though she was helped into the house

The officer’s entry into defendant’s garage after the car was parked askew and the door left open justified a welfare check at the door of the house. The officer responded to a 911 call about an erratic driver, and he … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on OH5: Officer’s entry into garage following erratic driver was justified as a welfare check on condition of driver, even though she was helped into the house

CA11: No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search

No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search. [The court alludes to what might possibly be some factual justification but doesn’t say that it was.] Watkins v. Pinnock, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 1881 (11th Cir. Jan. 22, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: No justification is needed for a jail booking strip search

PA: Officer retaining ID means citizen not free to leave and is seized

Retaining a motorist’s identification to run a warrant check was a seizure of the person. No one would feel free to leave under those circumstances. Commonwealth v. Cost, 2020 Pa. LEXIS 315 (Jan. 22, 2020):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on PA: Officer retaining ID means citizen not free to leave and is seized

MT: If only car color doesn’t match registration and everything else is correct, no RS

The car’s color not matching the registration information is not reasonable suspicion if everything else matches. City of Billings v. Rodriguez, 2020 MT 9 (Jan. 21, 2020). Plaintiff appeals dismissal of his § 1983 case for the officer pulling a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MT: If only car color doesn’t match registration and everything else is correct, no RS