Monthly Archives: August 2017

IA: Hour long detention waiting for drug dog lacked RS

Defendant was stopped for a window tint violation, which he didn’t contest. His LPN check of out-of-state plates took six minutes. It took nearly an hour for the drug dog to arrive. There was no reasonable suspicion for that long … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Hour long detention waiting for drug dog lacked RS

CA4: Even if consent invalid, PC for SW came from independent sources

“[T]he district court did not err in denying Hernandez’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the Samsung T199 phone because the search pursuant to the warrant was ‘genuinely independent’ of the initial search. Murray, 487 U.S. at 542.” United … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Independent source | Comments Off on CA4: Even if consent invalid, PC for SW came from independent sources

CA9: Officer’s call to def’s PO during stop didn’t unreasonably prolong it, and PO requested search

The officer’s call to defendant’s PO during his traffic stop did not unreasonably prolong the stop. The PO separately had reasonable suspicion for a search and requested one. United States v. Seugasala, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14173 (9th Cir. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Officer’s call to def’s PO during stop didn’t unreasonably prolong it, and PO requested search

OH6: Stop and arrest outside officer’s territorial jurisdiction does not violate state constitution

The officer knew he was outside his territorial jurisdiction when he made a stop of a suspect DUI, but this doesn’t violate the Ohio Constitution. State v. Curran, 2017-Ohio-7008, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 3130 (6th Dist. July 28, 2017). Lack … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading | Comments Off on OH6: Stop and arrest outside officer’s territorial jurisdiction does not violate state constitution

GA engages in de novo review of consent claim when facts aren’t in dispute

Since the facts are undisputed, the court does de novo review and finds that defendant consented to the breath test and reverses. State v. Jacobs, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 361 (Aug. 2, 2017). “Counsel was not ineffective in failing to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on GA engages in de novo review of consent claim when facts aren’t in dispute

D.Nev.: Nighttime search clause in SW moot where search was during day

Police showed probable cause for a DNA search warrant in an effort to connect defendant to an armed robbery. The warrant had a nighttime search clause. Since this all happened during daylight hours, any issues with the nighttime clause are … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Nighttime search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Nighttime search clause in SW moot where search was during day

W.D.Ark.: Can’t relitigate appealed search issue in a 2255

“The very Fourth Amendment issues now raised by Berger in this § 2255 proceeding were raised and decided adversely to him on direct appeal. … He may not do so again now.” United States v. Berger, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Can’t relitigate appealed search issue in a 2255

CA5: Plaintiff’s civil search claim was barred by Heck v. Humphrey, but his due process claim was not

Plaintiff’s civil search claim was barred by Heck v. Humphrey, but his due process claim was not. Shugart v. Six Unknown Fannin Cty. Sheriffs, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14190 (5th Cir. Aug. 2, 2017):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA5: Plaintiff’s civil search claim was barred by Heck v. Humphrey, but his due process claim was not

ACLU: A Federal Court Says Your Prescription Records Aren’t Really Private. The Supreme Court Might Have Something to Say About That.

ACLU: A Federal Court Says Your Prescription Records Aren’t Really Private. The Supreme Court Might Have Something to Say About That. by Brett Max Kaufman, Staff Attorney, ACLU Center for Democracy:

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on ACLU: A Federal Court Says Your Prescription Records Aren’t Really Private. The Supreme Court Might Have Something to Say About That.

SCOTUSBlog: Symposium: Carpenter and the eyewitness rule

SCOTUSBlog: Symposium: Carpenter and the eyewitness rule by Orin Kerr:

Posted in SCOTUS, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Symposium: Carpenter and the eyewitness rule

CA10: Not clearly established that even minimal force can be used to resist alleged unlawful search

Plaintiffs were involved in a domestic dispute outside their trailer that had started to cool down, or so they said. One wanted to go into the house to retrieve shoes, but the officer insisted on following to be sure there … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA10: Not clearly established that even minimal force can be used to resist alleged unlawful search

LATimes: Privacy trumps the expedience of police technology tools

LATimes: Privacy trumps the expedience of police technology tools (editorial):

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on LATimes: Privacy trumps the expedience of police technology tools

E.D.N.C.: 15 second delay in raising hands when told to is RS

Officers had reasonable suspicion when they confronted defendant on the parking lot of a club where there had been many crimes in the past. His delay for 15 seconds in raising his hands justified drawing their weapons. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: 15 second delay in raising hands when told to is RS

WA: Random UAs valid as condition of probation for DUI

“At issue in this case is whether a court may require a probationer convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) to submit to random urinalysis testing (UAs) for controlled substances. In particular, this issue centers on whether this testing violates … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WA: Random UAs valid as condition of probation for DUI

Cal.1st: Smell of MJ on the person is at worst indicative of an infraction and it can’t justify a search incident

Officers were attracted to a group of youths in an area known for potential gang violence. They approached them and informed defendant that he smelled of marijuana and searched him. Because smelling of marijuana isn’t a crime and possession of … Continue reading

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on Cal.1st: Smell of MJ on the person is at worst indicative of an infraction and it can’t justify a search incident

AP (Police One): Lawsuit: Neb. patrol accused of requiring vaginal exams for female recruits

AP (Police One): Lawsuit: Neb. patrol accused of requiring vaginal exams for female recruits by Margery A. Beck: State Patrol spokesman Cody Thomas said no NSP recruits have undergone the pelvic exams since December 2016

Posted in Body searches | Comments Off on AP (Police One): Lawsuit: Neb. patrol accused of requiring vaginal exams for female recruits

Reason: Federal Judge Rules Unlicensed Dogs Aren’t Protected By Fourth Amendment

Reason: Federal Judge Rules Unlicensed Dogs Aren’t Protected By Fourth Amendment by C.J. Ciaramella: Nikita Smith sued the Detroit police after they shot her three dogs on a pot raid. A judge ruled the dogs were “contraband.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reason: Federal Judge Rules Unlicensed Dogs Aren’t Protected By Fourth Amendment

IN: Officer safety concerns not shown for search of juvenile’s back pack for asking to borrow cell phone

The juvenile in this case was in a Kroger parking lot late one Sunday morning asking to use cell phones. The police were called, and he was found with two backpacks and the police suspected he was a runaway. A … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Officer safety concerns not shown for search of juvenile’s back pack for asking to borrow cell phone

D.Nev.: Passenger’s refusal to answer basic questions and ignoring officer during routine traffic stop justified patdown

“Here, the Court finds that Officer Kunz had reasonable suspicion to believe that Defendant was armed and presently dangerous, such that his patdown of Defendant was lawful. The stop occurred at night, when it was dark outside. After the vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Passenger’s refusal to answer basic questions and ignoring officer during routine traffic stop justified patdown

CA3: Being taken to a police station interrogation room in handcuffs was a de facto arrest

Defendant was de facto arrested when he was taken in handcuffs from the place of his seizure to a police station and placed in a holding cell for interrogation. United States v. Wrensford, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13894 (3d Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Being taken to a police station interrogation room in handcuffs was a de facto arrest